Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Recommended Posts

Posted
17 minutes ago, Sparky's__Adventure said:

@BullantHave you tried 5-9-6? Also, any chance of running timings like this on a Broadwell chip?

Hey, here’s a couple I ran...the Pentium is slower then I7..... I’m able to run cl5 on haswell, tho it’s no better efficiency then cl6. I have no Broadwell chip to try, in the coming months I plan on running lots of cold memory on platforms 1156-1155-1150-x79-x58 and AM3....maybe some other amd old stuff too, if it’s cheap I can afford to play with it. I’ll try heaps of stuff from cl5 and other things I think of...

 

D8-EBC970-C635-498-C-A853-AB918705-F3-FE
A7-BBFA0-E-8470-4-D1-E-9219-CDD274166-B7

  • Like 1
  • 4 months later...
Posted
On 8/28/2020 at 9:36 AM, Sparky's__Adventure said:

@Bullant What's the effect of tREFI for ddr3? Any different?

Thought I saw a screen of a z97 ocf user with 65535 tREFI

Just a little stability, as you know we did the same on ddr4 when it was released....

  • Like 1
  • 1 year later...
Posted

I second this, would like to see many subs like this, locked efficiency, but problem is secondary and tertiary, they need to be air values as well, in order to replicate. 

2800 9-12-12 would be another interesting sub. 

2666 8-11-7 bbse. 

All this are like iconic values. 

Posted
3 hours ago, suzuki said:

I second this, would like to see many subs like this, locked efficiency, but problem is secondary and tertiary, they need to be air values as well, in order to replicate.

I have had no issues with secondaries and tertiaries personally, I can go as tight as I need. Is that uncommon for ambient?

Honestly, I usually see people on LN2 running looser subs...

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 12/29/2021 at 3:52 AM, Sparky's__Adventure said:

@Bullant Hey bro, I have a favor to ask you whenever you get the chance. Can you do a SP32M run with 5g/5g, 2666 8-12-8, max effort with waza/16k/etc? I want an efficiency target for air cooling.

Hi, sorry most of my time atm is on Z690....Also I only have a Pentium for Z97

Posted
53 minutes ago, Bullant said:

Hi, sorry most of my time atm is on Z690....Also I only have a Pentium for Z97

No issue with only Pentium for Z97, just means some of us would need to practice efficiency with a G3258.

I saw your Z690 stuff as well, amazing work!

Posted
On 12/25/2021 at 11:22 AM, Sparky's__Adventure said:

Merry Christmas, everyone!

5_59_329.thumb.png.b5ed29b775d9d7710a8cb178724f138c.png

Think my memory is solid, should be good for above 2666 8-12-8, IMC is dragging behind. Also, would like to try a chip that can do 50/50.

Very interesting setup there Charles, full bank slots and 2450 7-11-7 with tCWL 6, producing fast 32M result.. BDBG ICs there?

  • Like 1
  • 4 months later...
Posted
On 12/28/2021 at 12:29 PM, suzuki said:

I second this, would like to see many subs like this, locked efficiency, but problem is secondary and tertiary, they need to be air values as well, in order to replicate. 

2800 9-12-12 would be another interesting sub. 

2666 8-11-7 bbse. 

All this are like iconic values. 

On the topic of a Samsung 2GBit D-Die efficiency reference, I stumbled across this video here:

Would love to see someone replicate or beat this, looks pretty viable to me.

  • 1 year later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...