octacore Posted August 13, 2010 Share Posted August 13, 2010 5870 + 10.7 if i click on "make public" nothing happens. Driver stauts = unknown Driver name und version is "empty". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted August 13, 2010 Crew Share Posted August 13, 2010 maybe the driver is too new and fm approved? did you try an older one? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoro Posted August 14, 2010 Share Posted August 14, 2010 Is LOD permitted? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lordred Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 Whats up with the top 3 showing only 1,2 of 7 tests then all 7 in the orb? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted August 16, 2010 Author Share Posted August 16, 2010 Is LOD permitted? Yes! Whats up with the top 3 showing only 1,2 of 7 tests then all 7 in the orb? How do you mean? Note that with 3DMark01, you can change the run order for better scores. So, you can tweak your clocks/lod for every subtest seperatelly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lordred Posted August 16, 2010 Share Posted August 16, 2010 I was un-aware of the 3dmark allowing you to run them indevidually (call me Mr Noob) I was just looking at there verification image and noticed it would have only 1, or 2 tests completed, and that the Orb would have a different CPU frenquency then the image verification, so needless to say I became confused. I brought it up so some one would explain it to me Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sil3ntSnip3a Posted August 17, 2010 Share Posted August 17, 2010 The difference in the two is located in the Nature subtest. The GTX275 will give you roughly 1250-1300FPS whereas the 4890 might only give a 1100FPS score, which is like a difference of 3000p overall. Now, the 4890 (or ati) is known to be better in the system benchmarks (cars and lobbies), so normally you can make up for that loss a bit. The issue is that there might be a nature 'bug' with the Ph-2 just like there is with the Nehalem platform. Basically, the Core 2 Duo platform gives you a single GPU Nature of 1500FPS easily, whereas nehalem (even at high clocks) will have scaling issues past 1100-1150FPS. In this case, the 4890 is a better choice because of the better other subtests ... but I don't know if this is also the case for PH-2. Hope this helps this helps a ton! I really need to get to the point of finding these findings for myself. I guess the more you bench, the more you learn! Thanks master massman! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chew* Posted August 18, 2010 Share Posted August 18, 2010 Yes. Newest C3 silicon of Deneb beats the crap out of TWKR anyway hmm I wouldn't go that far but the one survivor I have left is obviously not TWKR 42. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted August 29, 2010 Author Share Posted August 29, 2010 First test for me: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrinfinit3 Posted August 31, 2010 Share Posted August 31, 2010 My 1090 is out for RMA Made the run w/ my 965 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.