Massman Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 Nice! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ananerbe Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 WoW Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators websmile Posted February 3, 2014 Administrators Share Posted February 3, 2014 Strong result Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Calathea Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 myth busted? FX-9370 & 9590 only good for air/water.. doesn't look that way! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaPaKaH Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 what a chip! looking forward to strong SuperPi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
I.nfraR.ed Posted February 3, 2014 Share Posted February 3, 2014 Sam, it's not a "frequency monster", it just has a well balanced modules, although 3rd CU (CU2) is a little worse than the others. Frequency wise, it is ~8.23GHz on second CU. I've seen 8.25, but could not save it. With a better TIM it might be possible, but it's not better than my old FX-8350. That's my only FX-9xxx ever tested, so I can't tell for sure, but based on my experience, these chips should be more balanced, since they are required to run higher clocks on which FX-83xx almost always fail (or require excessive voltage) due to some weak CU. Nevertheless I will try pi 1M and 32M next time. Had no XP set up at that session. High CPU-NB clock should help. Just for reference, 4GHz required 1.45V on the CPU-NB. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.