Submission & member moderation

Sorry to post this here like that, sorry if I'm not in the appropriate section, but jmke has been so childish that I have not choice but doing it: aggressive/disrepectful reply + blocked pm on XS. Furthermore, he told me to post the problem here. Ok, here we go. Actually, I don't want to loose more time with all this; to be honest I don't care about hwbot (so I don't wanna grab points or something; I don't care about that, but only about justice). I have been a team moderator for quite a long time now, I asked jmke (who deleted an entry of a guy of my team) to please justify himself and to provide me with some kind of proof (he apparently did so according to somet…

I do not understand why this submission was blocked. The crew member who blocked it, first commented on the quality of the screenshot. I agree it was somewhat fuzzy, due to resizing, so I replaced it with a better save of the same screenshot. He next commented something about GPU-Z. I have two instances of GPU-Z open. One for each video card. It's not like I'm claiming I scored this with one video card. My submission states, in bold lettering 2x Radeon HD 4870X2 @ 839/1125mhz. The sensors tab clearly shows the clock speeds and memory speeds, and if you look at the fan speeds you can tell they are from two different cards. I don't understand blocking this score. http:…

Can an admin please switch these two results, the hwbot scores them to 2 decimal places, the scores to 3 dp make mine (3rd place) faster. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=806172 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=853957 Thanks

http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/Phenom%20X4%209950 This chart is off scale with that one being over 35GHz (?!), and that results quite non-readable chart. Hopefully someone corrects it. Regards Janne EDIT: Just found the one result and reported it, I was going to delete this post, but as a result of noobism in this forum, I can't seem to find a way to delete. Sorry.

Link to forum post states dual crossfire.............submitted under single card results....... Both Need to moved to X fire multiple card class......... http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_1475'>http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_1475 http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_1475

halo to al off you i have 3 flaged scores 1. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=856111&popup=true 2. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=856109&popup=true 3. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=856107&popup=true gpu-z tels me its a 9250 secundary so i post al this score in the 9250 se section but now the ar flaged as no 9250 se what is the good caterogi for this 3 scores grtz

Hi guys, I'm just making a quick thread hoping to get an answer to a simple question. If a score is in the hall of fame for, lets say GTX260 graphics cards, does that mean that an ORB validation link is mandatory or is just a screenshot good enough? I ask as I see many scores these days with only screen shots and no validation links. Please don't think of this as a rant, I'm just after a little clarification on the rules. Cheers.

Err.... as title really. If two different cards are used together, how should the result be submitted to HWB? Im guessing that it should be entered as a multi-GPU score in the category of the more powerful card? What if the cards are a CF/ CF-X of low-end current gen and high-end of last-gen, Or... if the cards performance is fairly similar? K

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=835893&popup=true I didn't run it at the correct resolution - I re ran it, and it's now valid but I haven't got the points. Just a little nudge to whoever needs to see it Peter.

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=839983&popup=true And this one? http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=840758&popup=true

I have a few 3dmark scores with i946gz/gma3000 which had insufficient verification for ranking. I reran the benches and have edited the scores. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=801904&popup=true http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=801905&popup=true http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=802395&popup=true Also, I edited the memory timings from 3-3-3-9 to 4-3-3-11 but for some reason this doesn't get saved? Please check and reinstate score, TIA!

Are this valid values (submited after 1-1-2008) with no screenshot and only checksum?. I can submit valid checksums with other versions (fastest than 1.55), so really think screenshot with CPUZ (cpu and mem) must be mandatory!!!!. Examples of doubt submissions: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=819944 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=758069

Looks like they probably changed team but instead of moving the scores / submitions over they have started a new account! http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=8131 http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=20946 check the Aquamark score, he just took a boint off even though the ss is the same:p

You cant xfire these cards, the 1st ever capable card to be xfire capable was the x850 so why are there results on hwbot 2 from the same name and all of them dont have screen shots and enough proof to prove there real let alone in crossfire. http://hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=1&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=Radeon+X800+GTO2+(336)&numberOfVideocards=2&cpu=&chipset=&model=&manufacturer=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=623&cpuId=0&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&mi…

Hi there, i have a little question: I had submitted a PCMark 04 score with a Sempron SI40 and integrated VGA HD3200 that result 1st place in category, but i haven't recive any point. Why? Thaks a lot

Hi to all, I'm jemaf, I'm new in hwbot.org and I need your help to not make the same error next time. i have the message "1 of your submissions require your attention", it seems to be in super pi 32 m but I not see the problem and I don't know how to make to solve the problem, is there a link that I haven't see? I see that: " Massman: manually modified by team captain (Massman)" and " slamms: reported by user (wrong result)" but what have I to do and how? an other question ,can someone explain to me what exactly I have to put in "verification url" I'm sorry but I need your help to not make other errors.........and thank you for your help

I am seeing a few scores with invalid checksums. Does this mean the score is invalid? Examples: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570855 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576620

I haven't been on HWBot in a while, and when I returned today I noticed that my PCMark05 result was flagged and invalidated for having the wrong validation link. I just noticed this and when I looked, I noticed that I somehow managed to post a Vantage link instead of a PCMark link. Go figure. Anyway, I have updated the submission with the proper PCMark05 Validation url, and included the reason for editing the submission. Please reinstate the score, as everything should be proper now. The compare url: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=829601

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=754806 Processor is an Athlon XP Thorton. It doesn't belong in the Athlon MP Palamino catagory. Thanks in advance for moving it.

You can have the inclusion of the Quadro FX2000 in the charts? Given these results placed: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=849513 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=849570 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=849517 Thank you in advance for your reply.

Hi I report several scores with 2600 pro with GDDR 3 which are placed in the "2600 pro" whereas there is a 2600 pro GDDR 3 category. I don't think this change a lot the points of overclockers who used GDDR3 2600 pro but it should be more fair for people who used GDDR2 Thanking you in advance see public ticket: http://www.hwbot.org/forum/helpcenter.php?do=ticket&tid=277

Hi, I have submitted what I though tto be the winning superpi 1m for Q9650. My score is 9.562 - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=847700 The listed #1 score is is 9.563 - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=830806 Can I get that fixed or what?

If I see some entries that are fairly new and are missing stuff like for example for 3dmark06 the gpu-z shot isn't there, or the 3dmark settings, but the score seems legit, is it still a valid submission?

I flagged this yesterday, its still there and not fixed.......there is NO CPU tab for memory, I don't doubt the result but rules are rules.....and I'd like to see the memory settings personally...... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=847929 "Any online SuperPi 1M submission must comply to the following rules: You must use the XtremeSystems version 1.5, having accuracy in milliseconds and checksum validation choose 1M calculation have a valid screenshot (see example below): clearly show SuperPi time and “calculation done” popup, processor in CPU-Z,memory settings in another CPU-Z instance , and checksum"

this guys score is for three cards and is in the single card catagory. can you please sort it http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=846045