Jump to content

Submission & member moderation

Discussion on how results should be monitored, discuss doubtfull results, ...

  1. Hey folks. Ok.. got a little question for everyone. I was sitting at 7th place this weekend. I came in on monday, and found out I was like 10th. The problem is the reason I dropped, is because I lost 10 boints. I checked all my big Global scores, and they appear to be the same value. So the only thing I can come up with is that I had some score blocked. Is there anyway I can find out if I have scores blocked? Ton

    • 1 reply
    • 1.2k views
  2. Started by boshuter,

    This score is in the wrong cpu section, it's submitted as a 660 prescott and is really a 661 cedar mill. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=503279

    • 1 reply
    • 1.1k views
  3. Started by harleybro,

    http://www.hwbot.org/compareProcessorResult.do?resultId=593566#result#result#result#result two of the people posting here appear to be the same running for differant forums is that allowed? Same name but one ends in 83 the other in 1983. The highest score is a link to a forum in a differant language which you need to register to see? Another link is to an EVGA banner?

    • 0 replies
    • 1k views
  4. Started by Jaan,

    Tyrou posted his wprime 32M results with quadcore in E6700 section: I hope, link works It's impossible to do 32M below 10s at 4,4Ghz dualcore here is verification link- this tells same- done by "IntelĀ® Core2 Quad CPU @ 2.66GHz" http://www.wprime.net/score.cgi?id=3566

    • 4 replies
    • 1.6k views
  5. Started by iL .PoLLo,

    AMD Athlon 800Mhz CPUZ http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=106051 n/a. CPU-Z - 798.53 mhz - LordofDoom (Guru3D) - (AMD Athlon 800Mhz @ 799mhz [#1 AMD Athlon 800Mhz in CPU-Z] ) 2 points - n/a. CPU-Z - 798.53 mhz - Satan (Guru3D) - (AMD Athlon 800Mhz @ 799mhz [#2 AMD Athlon 800Mhz in CPU-Z] ) 1.6 points -

    • 1 reply
    • 1.2k views
  6. Started by choco13,

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577932 no screen or link!

    • 6 replies
    • 1.7k views
  7. mivel (Team MXS ModLab...) Has no verification image or link found on all of his Posts AMD Sempron 2200+ Socket (A) http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_541

    • 2 replies
    • 1.1k views
  8. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572142 Points of proccesor are N/A. There is only compare score of Core 2 Quadro QX6700 on the screen. But test of his E4300 is N/A.

    • 2 replies
    • 1.2k views
  9. Started by most_wanted,

    Hi guy...about 3 hours ago I submitted a new score with my 8800GTS SLI at Acquamark3. Than the score was validate...normal... Now I submitted a score with 3d mark 2005 but I've seen the score removed from hall of fame!!! If need validation, I have it on my pc. Thanks most_wanted

  10. I was looking at these scores Today and notice something wrong? (The Scores) PcCI2iminal Global Rank score should be higher? CPU-Z - 5835 mhz - PcCI2iminal (XtremeSystems) 1.6 points Global Rank: not in top 1000, not ranked yet, or not the best result with this hardware of this user. ?????? Hardware Rank: 2nd Pentium 4 651 - 1.6 points http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=555818 http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=96564 CPU-Z - 6021.67 mhz - Epox4life (OC Forums) Global Rank: 34th - 19.2 points Hardware Rank: 1st Pentium 4 651 - 2.0 points http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559537 http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=87488

    • 4 replies
    • 1.4k views
  11. Started by Stelaras,

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=584383 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=583944 These two results are with QX6700 Quad Core and not with E6700 ! First score is here : http://www.wprime.net/cgi-bin/score.exe?id=3423 ... where you can read "IntelĀ® Core2 Quad CPU @ 2.66GHz Core: Unknown " In second score you can read "Description: Standard QX6700 " Thanks .

    • 13 replies
    • 2.4k views
  12. Started by Undertaker,

    Hi, there is a brocken verification link in there. "Allready verified as correct by a moderator" Under

    • 2 replies
    • 1.6k views
  13. Started by DEVILEK,

    Hello All I'm search for good clocking cpu in hwbot base and ... I live in Poland but bench for XS team, pkotlowski also live in Poland and bench for XS team but .. I'm good clocker in my country and I has been surprised becouse pkotlowski reached very, very good score with many hardware, but it was nothing about it in my country. So ... http://hwbot.org/user.do?userId=5625 - profile. Number one : http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572505 E6600 @ 5400MHz - 601 x 9 Holy moly - impresiv score. Valid with screen, but ID is 156036 Please check this ID in http://valid.x86-secret.com/ :lol: Next is : E6800 B0…

    • 1 reply
    • 6.6k views
  14. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=557097 it's not E6650!! http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_870 it's not E6200!! http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=575249 it's not E6750!!

    • 2 replies
    • 1.6k views
  15. Started by AbelJemka,

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=585147 vs http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581584 41120 3DM03 compare to me who can't pass 32000 same setup but cpu and card clock higher. Moreover no link no screenshot http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=585122 vs http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581589 Same here, pass 10000 3DM06 with cpu clock way behind me:rolleyes: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=579313 Already a thread about this but no answer so i reput it here. 150000 point Aquamark single X1950Pro with so low cpu clock is impossible.

    • 1 reply
    • 1.2k views
  16. Started by THRASHER2,

    This member need a printscreen and or a Forum linky SuperPi - 107.46 sec - Balu (PurePC.pl) 2 points Processor: Pentium 3 1.0Ghz @ 1320mhz Videocard: videocard unknown Description: P3 1GHz @ 1320 MHz || Debug mode http://hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_356

    • 0 replies
    • 1.8k views
  17. Started by Guest,

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=557116 This is an AM2 CPU that is in the 939 section for PCmark2005 see the verification link and ORB results and the benchers sig in the link to forum post, doesn't matter as it's 1st in either one..

    • 0 replies
    • 1.1k views
  18. Started by choco13,

    http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=579313 CPU clock is 31xx and the second place have CPU clock 4xxx. GPU clocks not so different to have 12000 points of difference 1 and 2 place.

    • 3 replies
    • 1.2k views
  19. Started by ojdr2001,

    Four friends join together for a bench session and in the same benchmark they produce 4 different results with small differences. They publish the 4 results each one in a different name. Is it legal?? Looks like it is becoming very popular in the rankings.... I think that should not be allowed...

    • 1 reply
    • 1.1k views
  20. Started by Guest,

    Faster by 3 seconds then any other Opteron 165? Is this allowed? It doesn't even have a checksum. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=579985

    • 6 replies
    • 1.7k views
  21. Started by TiTON,

    Hey folks. I was just crusing some of the results, and noticed one of my results was missing. I then found out it was "BLOCKED". So went and lookat my results.. Its a PCMark05 screeny.. which is legit.. because I did run it. Had PCMark Description , points, and CPUz all in one photo. Here is my results link: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571506 I did a search in the forum, but didn't find a thread where this was brought up. So if anyone can help explain why ti was blocked, it would greatly be appreciated. TiTOn Ok - I added my PCmark Validation Link to the Result here it is for quick reference: http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm…

    • 3 replies
    • 1.3k views
  22. Started by s1ugh34d,

    http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=552896

  23. just curious if the agp version should be in the same catagory as the pci-e versions when posting the results.

    • 1 reply
    • 1.1k views
  24. Started by gandalfone,

    Hi man, i want to ask you why you removed all my scores from hwbot. I posted the same result as Insane_Tech in SuperPi (9.48s) cause we didn't speek so we submitted the same screen. Now he had deleted this score from his profile, so please give back my points. Best regards

  25. Hi, a result without any verification link or image can be valid ? Like there ? Because I reported it as unvalid as there isn't any verification link or image, and it has been verified as correct by a moderator. Thanks Under

    • 6 replies
    • 1.8k views