Vinster

great work, but agree with Alavadomanuel. there is an active thread discussing that windows 8/10 are not allowed. There isn't a mention of an updated sysinfo. http://hwbot.org/newsflash/2684_windows_10_affected_by_same_downclock_bug_like_windows_88.1_disallowed_for_now

missing the memory tab to be valid.

I bow to you... great job.

I'm in the same boat as yourself. I don't get it either. if there is a "Tweak" I don't know what it is. I open the bench and click run... I don't play with the settings as some due (but am allowed as per the rules)... publish a bugged score so we can see what it looks like. Stop being evasive. Vin

If it's that buggy, then poll to have it removed. when you look at 20+ submissions and they all look in line but you call them bugged, there is a problem with the bench. Prove the bug, then get the bench removed imo. Vin

So did you report everyone's score that was above yours as a bugged run? looking at this table -> http://hwbot.org/benchmark/ucbench_2011/rankings?start=5&hardwareTypeId=processor_1741&cores=4#start=0#interval=20 my score is in line with everyone else's, and so is yours in 17th place. if you want to beat it... PUSH HARDER. Vin

I'd love to see some pics of the inside of that server.... please.... pretty pretty please...

Poop. I am in Montreal Weekend of the 7th... xo I wish I could go... Canadian Events are always so few and far in between.... Vin

Can you add a pic of the rig, I'd love to see it

great OC buddy

Great setup, I love it

Got to love Rapid mode.

On the records page this result is listed as the world record for all rankings 1x disk, 2x disk, 3x disk, 4x disk, etc.

do you have a link to it? Vin

Nope, great accusation though. Ran on my Lenovo W530 with Lenovo's Turbo Mode Enabled. I'd guess you didn't enable all 8 threads for the bench. My SB didn't score much slower http://hwbot.org/submission/2422572_vinster_wprime___1024m_core_i7_2760qm_275sec_160ms I'd re-run the bench if I were you.

thank you Vin

Thanks for that heads up... I just had it again and that sorted it out... Vin

http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/3u9eg/ Thank You Vin

There are many ways to skin a rabbit, but to have to perform any task to allow a bench to complete properly while the bench is running imo is wrong. Either fix the bench or get rid of it. This being an outdated bench there will be no fix. and any fix from anyone other than Futuremark is unacceptable as it could do other things and alter the standard. I've tried running this bench in WinXP, Vista and 7. I had only been able to run this bench a handful of times in WinXP builds and when I did, I did nothing special except for installing the required applications for the bench and running it. That's how it should be. Vin

So that doesn't fall under "Any software or human interaction altering the perceived speed of the benchmark program" in this case making it slower but not faster but still altering it none the less. Depending on how a user uses that fix one could cripple the score more than others. I've had that same problem so I chose to no longer use that bench because of this single issue. imo PCM04 should be removed due to this issue. If you can't run a bench under it's own accord it doesn't belong here. Vin

thank you Vin

Can a mod look at this submission please: http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2422576_ Says it's not my best SP1m submission for this CPU but it's my only submission for SP1m for this CPU. Something doesn't add up. Vin

I don't have the benchmark selection either... I click on the check for updates button and it says I'm up to date... then I checked the version and I somehow ended up with version 3.2???? Intels site showed it as the most current... I'm downloading v4.2 now... Vin

OMG this has happened to me so many times and I thought it was just me... Vin

Can you fix the links in the Video Bench section. these point to http://www.albenchmark.com