Hyperhorn

Congrats, great result! btw you deserve credit for using a good old E8600 and not the new-fashioned i5-2500K/i7-2600K stuff! ... and don't tell the Sandy guys about the Vdimm used - I'm not sure if they`re still used to the fact that a system doesn`t explode if you exceed the 1.6x V range.

This one is cherry-picked for sure. No Sempron 140 ever came close to that frequency.` btw is it prime-stable?

Damn, you've beaten me by 0.01 MHz. In percentage that's a plus of 0.0008 %.

Great result, congratulations!

Very impressive, great result!

You aid it.

Great! 5.6 GHz @ air is insane, keep pushing!

Wow, amazing result! RAM with Hyper-ICs should be able to run at tCAS=5 (means 9.5xx s ), but I guess it causes to much stress for the CPU-NB?!

It's an overall CPU-Z-record and the CPU-Z-record for a Celeron 352 @ Hwbot, but the overall CPU-Z-WR still belongs to duck from Japan: Celeron 360 @ 8242.45 MHz Congrats here as well, Sam!

Fantastic result! No benefit from higher Vcore or limited by FSB?

30 points difference between #2 and #4 - that's pretty close and a H.O.T. battle between AwardFabrik and Benchtec UK. You're pushing each other, so it's really hard for PURE and PCGH to close the gap at the moment.

Pics of P8P67 Deluxe and several other P67 mainboards: http://www.pcgameshardware.de/aid,799367/Vorab-Test-MSI-P67A-GD65-Asus-P8P67-Deluxe-und-weitere-Sockel-1155-Boards-fuer-Intels-neue-CPU-Generation-Update-Gigabyte-Boards/Mainboard/News/

Yes, the one and only SR-2. It´s very impressive just to look at the huge box actually, not even talking about the ammeter. Hats off, Evga for creating this unique high-end-mainboard! But as you know I´m not much into 3D. Actually I´m a bit disappointed that you can achieve ~15 points for such a single sluggish score. That`s just some kind of injury award for putting a wacky expensive system together. Unfortunately hwboints will never be able to tell you about how much effort somebody has spent for a result, so that´s not a big deal for me. I´ll try to get >30k @ air atleast, so I´ll beat your personal best Vantage score for now.

Great score, but it`s actually a Rampage III Extreme and not its predecessor.

Just imagine it`s not DDR3, but DDR2 and you´re very happy about > 650 MHz 4-4-4-12 @ 32M for sure.

George, can you tell me why "Your SuperPi 32m submission with a Pentium 4 531 changed from hardware rank 6 to 7" appeared on my hwbot front page today? I want answers - now! You´ve beaten two results achieved with at higher CPU frequency and Cascade cooling scores as well, so the force of RE + DDR3 + tweaking is with you.

I think it means hardware categories you participate.

Is there a way to perform this action automatically? In theory you would have to scan the validation link field entries and then search and replace the obsolete part of the link.

Personally I prefer CPU-Tweaker and/or Memset instead of CPU-Z/Mainboard, but as I include both of them usually, I think it`s useful to add CPU-Z/Mainboard of course.

Formula could almost be CPU clock frequency in MHz x 10 = 3DMark score Interesting results and accidentally I got my hands on a 3DMark 2000 retail package just a few hours ago.

You mean highest MHz bench-stable (likely 1M) or a complete list of the best benchmark results, e.g. xx.xx sec in benchmark A, xx.xx sec in benchmark B and so on?

Someone was lucky at unlocking the L3-Cache. Anyway, you uploaded the Pifast-Screenshot, so we can't see the 1M-run @16.491s here.

No fake, more details @ XS: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=260300

Same goes for these Wprime results: http://hwbot.org/community/submission/993901_nick.ua_wprime_1024m_core_2_e8500_3.17ghz_6min_52sec_421ms'>http://hwbot.org/community/submission/993901_nick.ua_wprime_1024m_core_2_e8500_3.17ghz_6min_52sec_421ms http://hwbot.org/community/submission/993901_nick.ua_wprime_1024m_core_2_e8500_3.17ghz_6min_52sec_421ms http://hwbot.org/community/submission/979245_nick.ua_wprime_1024m_sempron_140_13min_32sec_62ms (Found by Freakezoit, credit to him) Funny, eh? It's for sure a unknown bug which affects 1024M runs only (not 32M runs), which can be PITA@LN2.

The CPU is not overclocked, according to my knowledge I would have to hardmod the clock generator. What you see on the screenshot is just the highest multiplier available when turbo mode is activated (=default). That's the reason for several validations and single-threaded benchmark runs done with i5-520M @ 2926,x MHz: http://www.hwbot.org/hardware/processor/core_i5_520m?tab=2drankings