bolc

M5G just sold for 120 by websmile with a mosfet WB 2400c10 or 2600c11 2x4 gb, well you see all sorts of prices... untested like this, I would not pout more than 100 eurs in 4x4gb... I got 3 kits of tridentx 2400c9 2600c10 and 2600c10 for 120... (ok I made three great deals ) cpus is sweet, a XTU or geekbench3 run would tell more, but surely it can hold a lot. I'd say a regular 3770k is 150 eur, a roxxor 180-200 eur

That solves my pb

Hi, Is the socket in mint condition? Comes bare naked ? How much would be shipping to France? Cheers

I also get Switch OFF on XTU crash, which I didn't have before. No toher bench software does this. Good to see that 6.0.x (and others) and 6.4.x bench the same scores. In my case, 7 64 = 8.1 32 in terms of score, probably but not sure yet because I minimise the services opened. will test once more on Haswells, and my latest 4790k doing 5 @ ~ 1.27 V

G470 is better but much harder (and expensive to find) Your advise on VCCIO was excellent, thanks helped a lot to do 107+. I have not played with bclk skews. They are given form -19 .. 0 .. 19 I believe. Any tips were to start? I also try to boot with bclk as high and close as possible than the target. so 106+, with ram almost all set to best values, and fine tuned few timings before starting., Sopmething else I noticed, trying to go to high bclk straight will bsod crash, but going +0.2, then bneching, then +0.2 then benching, helps to go higher. on G465, that takes a long time but eventually I could make 0.59 fps on 4K like others, and a decent 2.31 on 1080p. Too much Vcore is useless too, actually counterproductive even, given the cpu runs at low frequency and never exceeds 40C on a small AIO 120mm. I need to improve my scores of a G4160 now, not the best x2 cpu but fairly decent. Cpu is delidded/relidded, waiting top go on my new M7I But I guess the most fun will be the next sempron 145 and AMD x2 -> x3, and x3 ...

Importing from older versions may be forbidden, that is fine. I d expect that importing from the same version would be allowed....? It was nice to have the full listing in one place

Hi Folks, I am looking for one chip of each. Shipping to France ++

Hi, Yep, I saved and exported. With 5.2.x and 6.0 I could see saved scores, and actually 6.0.x would give those obtained on 5.2.x. If I try to manually import a score on 6.4.1.12 from a submission made on 6.4.1.12 (and from older version), it complains and does nothing.

Hi, After saving then exporting a result, the result is not present anymore after a reboot. It used to be with prior versions. what am I missing? Best

I will read carefully Interesting about eh bclk skews. Familiar with P45 cpu and mch skews, but not on newer chipset, will have to dwelve into that to get higher bclk. Ram ratio and bclk go opposite: lower ram multi = higher bclk, and lower timings, so a trade off to find. I have done my 8.1 32 install, benching i3 4160 on XTU... will see if I can beat my previous score. On 7 64 I got stuck at the same values using cas7 instead although having a higher bclk...! hope I can take a few more xtu points EDIT: baseline score identical between 7 6 and 8.1 32

Very decent prices Have you benched the Hyper? 1800 (or more) 666-18 and 2300 888-24 at which voltages ?

tease me which timings and voltages?

what kind of crazy psc did you get, and ho much? ++

I've seen your X265 scores on celeron G4xx, very nice I am coming with a G465 on M5G or M5F, whichever is best for bclk. Nice ram you have in 2300 6-10-6 ! And nice cpu holding 2133 ram multiplier! Between the 1080p and 4K you switched ram coeff from 1866 to 2133, with same timings. Is 4K too demanding ? Will see if i go hypers at 2000ish 7-7-7, or psc at 2300 7-10-7 Hope to come not too far for global

my USB key with WIn8.1 32bits is also ready... a SS -40C is nice to have against my delidded ivys or untouched sandy (2500k coming!) + AIO 240 setup... ! which Sandy will you torture? I am curious to find out which ram multiplier is best for sandy ++

all the good stuff regarding ME firmware and IME is here: Forum - Intel Management Engine: Drivers, Firmware & System Tools I have flashed all my ME firmwares now... I suggest you flash your firmaware (under DOS, using FTK7 tool https://github.com/LongSoft/FTK/releases/download/0.11.1/FTK7_0.11.1.zip and the latest formware available on win-raid.com for consumer 1.5 Mb for the 6-series chipset, rev 7.1.x = Intel ME Firmware v7.1.80.1214 (1.5MB)) then install the latest IME driver (Intel MEI Driver Installer v11.7.0.1037)

non-K IVY do work, no pb and I guess Haswell as-well ! so my bet is Skylake / Kaby non K should !

till Nov 1, nothing excludes you from benching with 5.2.x on whatever OS you want ; in fact you could bench on 6.4.1.12 on your actual Win7. first oyu need to remove XTU, install KB3033929, then install 6.4.1.12. as of Nov 1. 6.4.1.12 will be mandatory. you can keep benching on Win7 after installing KB3033929, or move to Win8.1, Win10. If you plan to cotinue benching XTU later, moving now to 8.1 32 bits might be the best choice Ps: I am no moderator but I think I understood the rules right

Yes, thanks to Ev0lv3 ! KB3033929 solves it all ! The other method also works (going to Test Mode + manually verify the iocbios2.sys driver) Now is time to solve a corrupted ME firmware on a M5G

KB3033929 solves the issue as well ! To be installed prior to XTU software, and done ! Thanks Man ++

I missed your post, thanks I will try and post here (although I may eventually do a 8.1 32 bits installation...)

Results are comparable, I benched quickly 3770k at 3.9 and obtained 810ish with basic ram 8-11-8-28-1T. And obtained around 930 (from the top of my head) at 4.5 with slighlty tightened ram timings The only thing Test Mode does is to allow digital drivers not signed by M$... https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/help/2509241/how-to-disable-the-test-mode-message-that-is-displayed-in-windows

Question to the moderators: Am I allowed to bench on Win7 64 bits in TEST MODE (in the bottom right of the screen ,TEst Mode Windows 7 with the version is written) so the IOCBIOS2.SYS driver required for XTU 6.1.x, 6.2.x, 6.3.x and 6.4.x is digitally verified ?? Thank you

ok so I found one solution: Boot Windows 7 64bits into Test Mode and enforce unsigned iocbios2.sys to appear as signed / verified https://superuser.com/questions/1233615/how-to-force-windows-7-to-disable-driver-signature-enforcement the tool is available here Driver Signature Enforcement Overrider Download does the job nicely to enable the TEST mode, and to indicate which driver to digitally verify ! you can also manually do it with the bcdedit.exe command + manually press F8 at each boot... https://support.hidemyass.com/hc/en-us/articles/202723596-How-to-disable-Driver-Signing-check-on-Windows Making a W7 32 bits installation may also solve this... And W8.1 32 or W10 32 bits seem to work

XTU not recognizing the cpu all boils down to the digitally signed driver...!!! Pressing F8 at startup, you can disable it and install XTU. Now the cpu is recognizzed on thre latest version of windows. I need to do the digitally aigned driver permanently now ...!