bolc

109 would be nice 2 chips my way today

The hammer is coming

Well done ! Do you know if it is the rounded FPS that counts for ranking, or the real computing time? cause you will never exceed 0.6 fps (you'd have to go above 0.605 to get 0.61 rounding and there is some a long way to go with g470 to get there.... But at 0.600 real fps you d be first since True Monkey s score http://hwbot.org/submission/3451078_true_monkey_hwbot_x265_benchmark___4k_celeron_g470_0.6_fps is actually 0.5996 fps for 47'10 sec (no ms on the 2.0 version...)

Here are submissions by Lukisek20 for Xeon E5450: http://hwbot.org/submission/3758065_lukisek20_pifast_xeon_e5450_15sec_740ms http://hwbot.org/submission/3759127_lukisek20_superpi___1m_xeon_e5450_9sec_29ms http://hwbot.org/submission/3758074_lukisek20_superpi___32m_xeon_e5450_10min_0sec_741ms http://hwbot.org/submission/3758062_lukisek20_wprime___32m_xeon_e5450_8sec_631ms http://hwbot.org/submission/3758063_lukisek20_wprime___1024m_xeon_e5450_4min_12sec_518ms http://hwbot.org/submission/3753187_lukisek20_cinebench___r11.5_xeon_e5450_5.95_points http://hwbot.org/submission/3751208_lukisek20_cinebench___r15_xeon_e5450_356_cb to me it seems only the CBR15 (last one) is in line with other results, all others seem far too good to be true. For instance compare with TAGG superpi1M at 4800+ Mhz for 9.5 sec vs 9.029 for lukisek20 @ 4000 Mhz... http://hwbot.org/submission/3580246_tagg_superpi___1m_xeon_e5450_9sec_515ms

up

trying on 2.2 gave me no device supported, while it used ot. I will look into the driver issue as far as I am concerned with catalyst 11.12 and olders...

same here when I will get my 2 precious where did you get yours ?

the error is listed..., thanks to Wizerty and Strat: tWCL needs to be <= tCL, so 7 at most...

Hi Thanks. the strange thing is that some suceeded to detect the card http://hwbot.org/submission/3319863_nicegab_gpupi___1b_radeon_hd_4850_gddr3_14min_6sec_376ms with catalyst 13.9, opencl 1.2 on my hd7950, installing catalyst 15.7.1 installs opencl driver. it seems this carsd is only compliant with opencl 1.0 (these sites say 1.0 but gpupi worked in 1.2 so I guess 1.x is ok....?) https://www.techpowerup.com/gpudb/493/radeon-hd-4850 https://community.amd.com/thread/152535 here they dismiss 48xx from 1.1, suggesting that 1.0 is the only driver good for 4850. https://www.mql5.com/en/articles/690 but since it worked on gpupi for several hwbot subs, 1.2 should be ok. the only way I know so far to install opencl is via catalyst center. it installs OpenCL Driver 10.0.937.2. perhaps there is another way to force 1.2 installation instead of 2.0 ? THERE MAY BE HOPE HERE: http://www.geeks3d.com/20091221/how-to-enable-opencl-support-on-nvidia-and-amd-platforms/ I will try luxmark too. Cheers

Hi I have tried running Win7 64 with HD4850, catalyst driver 13.9, latest on amd site, with gpupi 3.0.1, and the device is not seen un gpupi. It seels intel opencl and amd opencl for the cpu only. same thing with 2.2, 2.3.4 legacy and 3.1 any hints where to look after? Thank you Cheers

I fix them all manually. trrd 4 trtp 4 twtr 7 twr6 trfc 86 tckl 4 twcl8 faw 18 for secondary mrc fast boot is enabled on my board i think, can put it off to see if... nonetheless, subtimings can make 50+ pts difference ...?

u r crazzyyyy.... !!! beware because 2019 is faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrrrrrrrrr from now.... and you won t have enough time in 2019 to bench all this send me one L3014, and I will send it back to you in working condition ! PS: curious what those Trident ? = 3 kits of G.skill 3x2 2000 cl9 will give, if they are psc or elpida (serial numbers 4-7 or 5-8 are 104x or 064x/065x/066x) My favorite and best ram are g.skill, and trident / tridentx, forever...!

man, what do you do of all this ram / cpu hardware you buy...?

40x is available for 1-2 cores only, with 3x it is 39x and with 4c 38x to enable 1-2-3c under lighter loads, enable C3 c-state option (that one is enough, leave other c-states disabled) hence during the prime workload of xtu, the cpu will be 38x but in between it will go to 39-40x, perhaps making intermezzos a little faster ; on the overall score XTU it changes nothing imo...

Yes sure. One thing I am heavily suprised about, and I can/will substantiate my thoughts with screenshots if you want, is that benching with CAS7 always gives much much worse scores for me when using XTU !!! For instance, the 3470 benched at 107.8-108ish bclk, and 2200+ CAS7 = 7-10-6-24-1T trfc=86 and fairly tight other subs, will barely give 798-800pts, while the same frequency on CAS8 (8-10-8-24-1T or 8-10-8-26-1T) will make an easy 850+ pts on 2133 or 2200 ram multiplier. If I bench with Prokon (2185 Mhz @ 7-10-6-24-1T) or with Luumi's settings (2300 Mhz @ 7-10-6-28-1T http://hwbot.org/submission/3680063_luumi_xtu_core_i5_3470_853_marks), I will never exceed 800 pts, no matter if I use the 2000 Mhz (1:10) ram multiplier like Prokon does, or the 2133 Mhz 1:8 multi like Luumi does... The same happens on Haswell. I tried Win7 64 or Win7 32 (btw no difference between both... and no difference between 8.1 32 or 10 32 and 7 64... superfetch + maxmem applied) Any thoughts why they can, and why I can't? Ps: My ram can handle 2300+ cas7 (g.skill pi 2200cas7) and 2600+ cas8

I changed my mind in the meantime... and wait for l0ud_sil3nc3l / The Purge to tell me if he has any...

hopefully it was temporary bans... i d agree with you if this would be consistently done. in his case, he has lots (really a lot!) of xeon x1 and x2 subs, he may have missed those 2 out of his multiple dozens... a bit like when submitting amd unlocked cpu scores, sometimes, the system bugs and does not let you adjust the number of cores although you edit. it can get frustrating and hard to find the faulty sub later on, or manage to get it right. not sure if that applies to multi cpu benchmarks in term of "submission difficulty" if the results "steals" lots of points, and the owner doe not do anything, yeah, that sounds like cheating. but for those little guys lost in the darkness of 771 benching, I do not think that strongly. but yeay, you are the rule enforcer Cheers

Hi, Any L3014 left? Batch numbers, Vid perhaps, available ? Shipping to EU, France fine with you ?

Great to hear the 4850 will work with it, I use win7 64 so it is fine Thank you

not exactly on the dual xeon bug issue, but what about submission with dual xeon stations, competing with single xeon submissions...? (submitted by mistake on both I think) same score submitted as both 4x and 8x http://hwbot.org/submission/3607721_stingeryar_gpupi_for_cpu___100m_xeon_e5440_45sec_130ms http://hwbot.org/submission/3608472_stingeryar_gpupi_for_cpu___100m_2x_xeon_e5440_45sec_130ms 8x submitted as 4x http://hwbot.org/submission/3607549_stingeryar_gpupi_for_cpu___1b_xeon_e5410_12min_19sec_2ms

Hello I was about to ask if using older gpupi version like 2.2 may help benching old ati card like hd4850 (which 2.3.4 does not recognize...) but 2.2 is not allowed for some time already ... may this new 3.0.x version do the job for hd4850 and alike as well as for c2d cpus ...? will test it soon. is 3.0.1 presently valid/accepted for submitting results ? Thanks. Cheers

we have the same board, on paper at least...

Hi nicely done ! What is your secret for 108.8 blck?

I will check your news

Hi Man I take 3 = ep45 ud3p shipping to France via national post service (postNL) Socket is in mint condition, with pins straight and where they should ? rev 1.0, you know its max fsb on quads ? for ddr2s, r u sure these are d9gmh ? I am tempted taking those as well ! Although mori wants a bunch of stuff, he better have them