bolc

Nice timings and score ! I got mine at 8-10-7-24-1T trfc=80 and lots of 4 secondary timings... Surprisingly, my XTU score would go down on 7-10-7-24, but 7-10-6-28 was probably the answer which you found

I agree till his last sentence, but resetting all points is NOT fair, period. As of now, I will personnally post cpu-z windows and keep a memtweakit screenshot in case of complaints. You can tweak a lot the ram timings to improve the score. What we need in XTU is a verification code like un superPI ...? Ideally, the Intel community can come up with an update for all Intel cpu generations, since a XTU version does not support beyond n-3 generations. So posting ONE updated XTU version per CPU generation would be ideal....?

Some common sense has reached Earth ! We might wonder who needs to uncover this cheat now, to get some competitors doing a lot of XTU off the chart...? Probably a silly scenario of my mind watching too many movies... taking down these scores will impact a lot of honnest folks. I am thinking about a Polish guy who would get blasted from the #2 or 3 if XTU goes down... Plus many enthusiasts like myself, binning the best ram and board they can since at least that pays off in XTU..., then getting out the most their cpus can give, using the guidelines (i.e no cheats ; + I don't even run on W10 32 bits which everytbody think is the best...), and their "modest" material means !

Hi. Instaled the latest version on Maximus V formula, and no system information is displayed on the right handside panel, plus whenenever I click on Run benchmark, error log is displayed. Looks like this version sucks big time... Can t recognize the cpu and number of cores... (i5 3570) Got this message form another topic http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=162384 So I know 5.2 and 6.0 are ok with Ivy. 6.2, 6.3 and 6.4 are not. Will try 6.1 to see if it works

Hi Dude, Thanks for the tip regarding the Samsung chips ram I make 2800 9-12-12-20-1T 108 at 2.04 V on the best I have UP for the PSC ram you are looking for

UP

UP

Sweet ram modules, my favorites

lol thanks for the link ++

bump

Hi Your post made me go back testing my 2400c9 / 2600c10 tridentx kits. They are pretty similar at 2400c9 and 2600c10 in term of minimum voltage required. Curious to see how voltage scales with frequency... The first module is sweet, 2600 9-11-11-20-1T 102 at 1.72 seems ok (tras can be lowered at 18 or 16, I tried once in XTU session). Is this anything similar to yours or you benched straight at 2800 ? Next step is 2800, and I guess I will need to trcd=tras=12... also waiting for a 4670k with hopefully a better imc than my g3258 (2800 is fine with one module with MFR chips, but not with 2...). UP on your search

Hi websmile, I saw your post, which you removed 13.9 is the supported official driver https://support.amd.com/en-us/download/desktop/legacy?product=legacy2&os=Windows+7+-+64 I can make screens in the future if any are needed (the rig is unmounted currently).

You already have the best sticks, nobody can compete

Hello This one is strange I installed AMD catalyst 13.9 with app sdk and catalyst center for the 4850 DDR3. In the GPUPI list I get AMD Opencl and Intel Opencl for the cpu, but nothing at all for the gpu (driver is installed though). Strangely enough, no scores are posted for DDR5 card, only for DDR3 cards, like mine. GPUPI - 1B overclocking records @ HWBOT I tried GPUPI 2.2 as others did, but same result.

Thanks, and well put I had not enabled hd audio and installed no driver so the fil was simply missing. I added one from https://www.dlldump.com/download-dll-files_new.php/dllfiles/F/fmod.dll/3.72/download.html and it works fine...! If this thread can be of any help for other dummies like me ++

Hello, I can run 3dmark01se, 05, 06, vantage, no issues whatsoever For 3dmark03 I get this crash error. I tried uninstalling reinstalling, removing all other 3dmark softwares, removing futuremark info, and having only a clean 3dmark03 install, and I still get this. I also launched directx 9.0c standlone installer, which did not install anything new, same issue. Any thoughts...? Thanks in advance. Cheers.

I cryyyyyyyyyyyyy

I have seen your EDIT thanks for the pictures. too many caps are missing from the socket area do you see that ? that s the original M7I socket picture : https://media.ldlc.com/ld/products/00/01/74/04/LD0001740449_2.jpg hey man, I am looking for M7I not M8I thanks anyway

I will be back at 850

I am not complaining, I am trying to figure out the rules, but this will be my last post here Here is a copy paste from the link given by geekbench, it covers mroe than exhaustively the few info given on the launch app window System manufacturer System Product Name Operating System Microsoft Windows 7 Professional (64-bit) Model System manufacturer System Product Name Processor Intel Core i7-3770K @ 3.50 GHz 1 processor, 4 cores, 8 threads Processor ID GenuineIntel Family 6 Model 58 Stepping 9 Processor Codename Ivy Bridge Processor Package Socket 1155 LGA L1 Instruction Cache 32 KB x 4 L1 Data Cache 32 KB x 4 L2 Cache 256 KB x 4 L3 Cache 8192 KB Motherboard ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC. MAXIMUS V FORMULA Northbridge Intel Ivy Bridge 09 Southbridge Intel Z77 04 BIOS American Megatrends Inc. 1903 Memory 4096 MB DDR3 SDRAM -1MHz ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Finally, how valid is HWMONNITOR showing only the core temperatures (temp = Tjmax - DTS value) ? An example, between several, of surely honnest people : stivut`s Geekbench3 - Multi Core score: 22963 points with a Core i7 7700K By not being specific enough, you may force folks contributing to HWBOT to rebench and resubmit because you might decide to block their submission. End of my story

how useful is the link with all the system details ....? hwmonitor, how serious is that when you can change the tjmax in the .ini file...? same with core temp with adjust offset, same with hwinfo. ok, that does not change cpu or package temp... but what is cpu temp anyways: is it cpu temp, package temp, a core temp....???? please be technical and precise or don't pretend to be enforcing useful rules hwbot...

squirks like dying prematurely? offtopic, i am told M8I is great but tends to die quickly... unlike M9 Apex. Wonder if M7I has the same issues...

"Hello, An HWBOT moderator, "websmile", has blocked one of your submitted scores. It has marked one of your submissions as 'insufficient verification'. This was the reason the user gave: Please check example screenshot, launch app is mandatory You can view your result here: http://hwbot.org/submission/3666090_bolc_geekbench3___multi_core_core_i7_3770k_18121_points" haha laughing my ass off. anyways gotta resubmit with 4790k to have slightly better now, to be even more critical, what is the point of this link if the launched app needs to be shown...? System manufacturer System Product Name - Geekbench Browser

I know this league allows subzero with di, petlier, etc. Thank you for the advice anyways... my confusion was based on stage 3 = wprim32m allows apprenctice hence no monitoring required and stage 2 = geekbench3 stops at enthusiasts, so temp monitoring required 2 vs 3 syndrom in the Edition & stage numbering, gb3... Thanks for the quick posts though

so for this one in particluar allowing apprentice (to be understood as non extreme ?), is the monitoring required or not? a clear cut answer would be highly appreciated. thank you