Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

bolc

Members
  • Posts

    689
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Everything posted by bolc

  1. I have seen the box regarding unlocking, but indeed here nothing is unlocked. I have submitted only to one model. I use the newer bios because the card came with it, first, and second the newer bios can give better options for lower Vcore, give higher frequencies by default, etc. and I would be fine to post the picture of the sticker with model and sn numbers, but not sure everybody can (original fan or sticker may be missing) and not sure everybody may want to do that (stolen sn for warranty or whatnot)
  2. Hi all, If we have a X model card and have flashed it as the successor (AMD has 7950/7970, which could be flashed as r9 280/280x, and for instance rx470 can be flashed as 570). My guess is that their results should be submitted as the original card model number. Of course, this will give discrepancies as validation links may tell this is Y card while we submitted as X card. The device ID can tell the difference in GPU-z I suppose, but this may cause the situation of too many reports by "unexperienced" (or troubled : D ) users, consuming Hwbot mods quite some time. Can a moderator tell me/us more about this ? Plus, would it be efficient to have a special box to flag, mentioning the original nmodel and the bios model, with a check box "identical" by default, but that one can modify if the bios is modified? This was discussed here quickly as well for Vega 64 but haven t seen a moderator giving the "official" opinion Thank you
  3. 3900 MHz (1 core) http://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Core_i7/Intel-Core%20i7-3770S.html add +4 using a Z77 board, simply by adding +4 on the cpu multiplier in the bios, that makes 4.3 on 1 core, 4.2 on 2 cores, 4.0 on 3 cores and 3.9 on 4 cores. then oc the bclk as your cpu and mobo can, start off around 104-105 that makes 4.3 x 1.05 = 4.515 then up it slowly and surely, in the OS, +0.2 of bclk each time, saving cpu-z validation file each time, till it freezes...
  4. Hello, What is the price for a max vii impact? boxed, i think with most accessories, to be checked. Cheers
  5. kaspersky as for the services, both files are present but services.exe (the 32 bit) will never be able to execute / load as a service. BenchMate Security Service (32/64 bit) : in my services.msc, i have two entries, one for the 32 one for the 64 bit. the 64 bits can run but the 32 will never run w7 64 sp1 in both cases. in fact it gives the same error on a light w7 edition used for tests, and on a daily (which gave the trojan alert)
  6. LOG START at 2019-11-10 20:27:06 ---------------------- Verifying file signature of: D:\DL Mozilla\BenchMate 0.9.3\bin\client64.exe => Issuer Name of file: DigiCert EV Code Signing CA (SHA2) (verifying with: DigiCert EV Code Signing CA (SHA2)) => Subject Name of file: overclockers.at e.U. (verifying with: overclockers.at e.U.) Verifying file signature of: D:\DL Mozilla\BenchMate 0.9.3\bin\service32.exe => Issuer Name of file: DigiCert EV Code Signing CA (SHA2) (verifying with: DigiCert EV Code Signing CA (SHA2)) => Subject Name of file: overclockers.at e.U. (verifying with: overclockers.at e.U.) Verifying file signature of: D:\DL Mozilla\BenchMate 0.9.3\bin\service64.exe => Issuer Name of file: DigiCert EV Code Signing CA (SHA2) (verifying with: DigiCert EV Code Signing CA (SHA2)) => Subject Name of file: overclockers.at e.U. (verifying with: overclockers.at e.U.) Verifying file signature of: D:\DL Mozilla\BenchMate 0.9.3\bin\client32.dll => Issuer Name of file: DigiCert EV Code Signing CA (SHA2) (verifying with: DigiCert EV Code Signing CA (SHA2)) => Subject Name of file: overclockers.at e.U. (verifying with: overclockers.at e.U.) Verifying file signature of: D:\DL Mozilla\BenchMate 0.9.3\bin\client64.dll => Issuer Name of file: DigiCert EV Code Signing CA (SHA2) (verifying with: DigiCert EV Code Signing CA (SHA2)) => Subject Name of file: overclockers.at e.U. (verifying with: overclockers.at e.U.) Verifying file signature of: D:\DL Mozilla\BenchMate 0.9.3\bin\service32.dll => Issuer Name of file: DigiCert EV Code Signing CA (SHA2) (verifying with: DigiCert EV Code Signing CA (SHA2)) => Subject Name of file: overclockers.at e.U. (verifying with: overclockers.at e.U.) Verifying file signature of: D:\DL Mozilla\BenchMate 0.9.3\bin\service64.dll => Issuer Name of file: DigiCert EV Code Signing CA (SHA2) (verifying with: DigiCert EV Code Signing CA (SHA2)) => Subject Name of file: overclockers.at e.U. (verifying with: overclockers.at e.U.) Verifying file signature of: D:\DL Mozilla\BenchMate 0.9.3\bin\bmrbt64.sys => Issuer Name of file: DigiCert EV Code Signing CA (SHA2) (verifying with: DigiCert EV Code Signing CA (SHA2)) => Subject Name of file: overclockers.at e.U. (verifying with: overclockers.at e.U.) Loading driver file: D:\DL Mozilla\BenchMate 0.9.3\bin\bmrbt64.sys Starting control service Could not start control service: The system cannot find the file specified. [#2] Installing control service in 64 bit then it crashed on my other setup, it would not load services.exe, only the 64 bit, and then complain it could not start the 32 bit
  7. Sorry about that, yours went passed too many i got while having little time answering and spending time doing the tests so the sale would be "clean" for now I put it on hold, but based on the offers I received, 200 is baseline but I'd like to sell it for more. but for now, i focus on selling rams, and will come back later for 4790k
  8. Hello, Which windows services should be on to run the benchmarks? W7 64 saying that it failed tostart security service in 32 bits : cannot find the file specified In the debug, it says that control service in 32 bit is not running. I can see a service64.exe running though in services.msc, i can see two new services, oe for 32 the other for 64 bit/. the 64 is started, the other one will not start. no dependencies shown. Thanks
  9. CBR15 @ 4.9 and 5.0 Ghz added
  10. spi32m screenshots for ddr3 psc added
  11. thanks I thought good 4770k s were harder to get, or at least I stumbled upon much worse 4770k than 4790k
  12. I will definitely have to... ++
  13. i am an apprentice, it is forbidden nope, never. this one never got colder than 0C
  14. thanks. would you know for 7700k ? 5 @ 1.22 V i am selling my oc parts, i suppose r5 3600 to come, plain and simple
  15. hi I note that, thanks ! in italy ? i see you are interested by ddr2 as well? I have a bunch of them. looking at performance for cas4 or cas5 ? these are d9, ballistix, all binned under spi32m looking for ddr3 psc too or you are fully equipped? ++
  16. For sale In principle reserved to someone but if no answers by the end of the week, it goes for sale 2600 CAS8 @ 1.82 and 1.84 V passing spi32m. On my former 4790k they also passes spi32m with 2 - 5 - 6 for tWTR tWTR and tWCL set in bios, but on my g3258 it can't. it boot windows but fails spi32m. I am pretty sure it is the imc and corresponding voltages Asking price 50 excl shipping, within EU Pictures with nickname to follow
  17. Did you get to a positive end? If not you may want to spam there
  18. thnaks.just looking to run XMP profile on ryzen2/3 in fact
  19. hi do you know if A1 layout is running fine on ryzen, say ryzen 2 or 3 ? these 4000c18 are in good "external" condition? Cheers
  20. amazing 2500c9 and cool looking !
×
×
  • Create New...