xxbassplayerxx

Well... I have the memory... But not the IMC Anyone going to be having fun with this?

Ohhh great.

The money issue isn't the one that gets me. I pre-ordered this thing the day they opened up for pre-orders. It's the damn results window... The UI has plenty of room to display the detailed results. Every single Futuremark bench before now has had it so this had to have been a conscious decision, which is why it pisses me off. Futuremark wants to funnel everyone through their site even if it is at the customers' expense.

lol indeed. Agreed!

I'm all for it. 3DMark 11 is cool... but there are definitely some things that should be fixed. Which begs the question, why is it so hard for Futuremark System Info to get clocks? I'm not sure I've ever seen correct clocks through that. It's not like GPU-Z or CPU-Z have any trouble...

Nice! I'll be buying one for sure then

Yes I agree. I don't think this will actually replace a results window, but it might satisfy some curiosity.

Ghostleader over at OCN found out how to view the subscores without going online. You can save the results and open it with any archiver (like WinZip or WinRAR). Open Results.xml and the numbers are all in there. This won't help for screen shots, though. http://www.overclock.net/11565060-post60.html

I pre-order their benchmark and they pull all of these tricks! EDIT: My vote is no until they fix it.

Thanks again Massman. I had no idea where it went!

Yeah. I'm upset because I purchased the Advanced Version but I still have to go online to see my subscores.

I mentioned this in a new thread in this section but apparently I'm not allowed to talk about it, as someone deleted it...

3DM11 uses Bullet to calculate Physics. PhysX will not help or hurt you in this benchmark as it does not utilize it.

The only way to view details is to submit online. Way to drop the ball, Futuremark. Think we have enough pull to get a patch?

Very nice! How high were you able to get with triple channel? Did you go with dual because of CB?

Is that chilled water? 5.2 is crazy!

Patch man, I don't know how this wasn't a 130K run... Must have been a bug.

Beat of luck to you man

Congratulations! This was a very efficient run! Lower BCLK and better score. Seems I have some tuning to do for future runs. I'm actually using a UD9 now too but I sold my Xeon. I'm trying to get a hold of a decent 950.

Bummer I just sold my W3520 a few days ago. It seems you waited the perfect amount of time to take these! I had a 15.68 but it froze when I was taking the SS and I just moved on

Not enough time to kill it... you need to run it 4 times in a row

Just wondering how you managed to beat the second best time (at higher clocks than you) by almost 33 seconds? Bugged run?

But it's still bad!

I absolutely agree. However, your issue is with Massman.

I'll ask my question again: Does this do anything different than setting priority and affinity?