Leeghoofd

Enable start with windows !

Thread rules are more to finalise or an aid in making decisions in new rule tinkering via input of the overclockers... Indeed the benchmark rules should be directly updated on the main page, once a decison has been made. Not like it has happened last year. But Pro is in full control now, he watches this thread and PCmark 24/7 from now on... go James go !

Brazil on top of the pack

Typical ATI style, each benchmark it's own drivers/OS. FYI higher LOD is not always better. Some benchmarks prefer higher PCI-E, some need more CPU speed to scale, some benchmarks prefer reboots iso of reruns. ... All some of the reasons why I don't do a lot of ATI stuff, while others just adore the tweaking aspect.

For the OC event(s) I'm in (if in europe), but not to wander again during 4 days to hardly see anything new... better meet up with the guys and have some fun..

Alf will prolly not be there, might be in Afghanistan or Warsaw then... depends

great one, nice run and CPU !

tWL in Gigabyte bios Dude if you can do 2600 8-11-8 32M stable on air, then you bought yourself a very good PSC kit. My BBSE only can/could do that. My PSC Flare kit can do 2600C8-12-8 at 1.88Vdimm...

ssssssssssstt they are everywhere...

Keep it all in one thread plz, don't make a gazillion different threads for this OC... it looks fine for the hardware... but we ar emore interested in bench results as in SuperPi and Wprime iso Aida or Sisoft bandwith nrs

if you cant set twcl to 7 then CAS7 performance is bugged

Would redefining the whole watercooling as liquid cooling be a better idea ? I sense your problem is the ranking you end up in. Keep in mind that even with air cooling you will end up against people doing air/water cooling at -15°C outside

Well done, amasing score !

ghetto cable management there

There can only be one Sweet Which ban is it ? 6 months , a year, perma ban ?

luv you to Sweet

ze germans screwed me lol

Original 05 score was just above his score 47774 points : http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2230854_sidd_3dmark05_2x_radeon_hd_6870_47774_marks M1K41L's 05 score score 47747 score : http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2341537_ Original 06 score 37378 idem ditto :http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2285943_rafudos_3dmark06_2x_radeon_hd_6870_37378_marks M1K41L's 06 score 37373 : http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2341522_m1k41l_3dmark06_2x_radeon_hd_6870_37373_marks UPDATE : Vantage 22880 score the same : http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2341795_ (look at the 0 ) real score 22882 here : http://www.hwbot.org/submission/2209915_kinhung_3dmark_vantage___performance_radeon_hd_6870_22882_marks/ Look here far lower GPU subtests (10-30fps on all tests ), yet M1K41L achieves a higher 03 score then the guy i crosschecked with ( other GPU ) and so on.... seems most of his scores are a work of art... Some nice copy paste action, but he got sloppy I hope he get's sanctioned accordingly

yeah and late too the party

close but no cigar... try harder next time plz

admins advised... thx Sam

Fake 06 score is with 4800Mhz Sandy, the older legit score is with X79... How about the 05 score subtests ? one in a million shot ?

1) How big is the chance of perfect similar subtest scores ? Older legit 05 submitted score by user XXX : New submitted ahum legit 05 score : Exact the same subtest scores, however the final score differs... Want some more ? 2) New submitted scores, same hardware but now in 3DMark06 How about these subtests ? Older legit 06 submitted score done by user XXXX : Similar subtests in same hardware ranking New submitted ahum legit 06 score : Ow really ? subtest scores differ from those in the final score tab... and are exactly the same as user XXXX If I am right I want this guy outta here...

Too little too late... sigh crap Ebayers, bought the card two weeks ago. Straight Paypal payment, the dude shipped it 7 working days later...

Uttter sexyness !