Leeghoofd

take lowest vid card , we tested a few on air; till now lowest vid cards made us pas +1000 on air... PJ will make a full post soon Rbuass

wtf Angelo, just stop Pcmark05 then... can't 100% understand the frustration... Look at the votes, most wanted new rules, but did not vote for the removal of the 220XP cap...

You can remove the mods to send it back later on You used Rogiers new soft tool ? On air it does nothing special... maybe it needed the new firmware... I think the issue is the girlie tissue paper, it's holding you back... Tri sli soon ?

go go mad man !!

Nice work there B, show them what you are made off

Not really required for 3D11 Gigelz... Matrix or Platinum card herr Boris ?

Nice work mista Pro

If so, I just have the right product in my garage.... NAPALM !!

I have no issue with an award if it's well argumented Tudor... but this particular site is the perfect example of how it should not be done... but the marketing guys don't give damn... high score and an award is what makes them tick !!

Why didn't they call the website AwardHeaven instead of HardwareHeaven

Leeghoofd is new "leeghoofd biased" now. As I have to wait for boards to come through via some of these "A" class websites. So getting boards late, missing out on hits etc... Honesty is not appreciated Some vendors don't even want to mention my review on their site as it's got some negative pointers in it... sigh.... I must be a prick in the real and virtual world ( plz no comments from massman and Christian Ney on that plz )

Physx is disabled in the latest version of the benchmark, unless you force it ofc...

Too bad Massman and Gamer failed to do a decent 285 score ( on card seems defect after voltmodding ) otherwise we could have nailed this one... congratz to all participants !!

I voted : Just keep it and add a few new rules... But don't raise XP startup : as it will be far too easy to set new records with better "future" storage devices. At least it makes it a challenge to tune that particular test... But all those with silly encoding and co results must be rejected... even the scores from Down Under...

Jonas > PJ > Marc Beier

Revision 5 beta 4 release 12 ?

Kick ass Romania !!!!

Time to get that efficiency up mate.. nice CPU ( again)

need more CPU power Nik for crossfire action

it's common knowledge massman can be bribed... so start to donate for your August compo

first run on other XP is 41293, seems other OS bugged. Ran a 06 and 03 too on SLI : scores good..., just reran on the other "bugged" OS: 39K, darn... 03 143K Well I'm glad Asus got the M4E up to speed... we benched on the UD5 for the MSI 560 ti review and darn it was voltage hungry and so erratic in boot behaviour sometimes... plus we couldn't get our usual clocks stabilised... K guys let the flame war start : I'm ready for you ....but remember to some I know where you live !!!

ofcourse I'm biased tried the 1866 divider same low output, ran 03, good score... weird thing is the other bios and the UD7 were tested on the same windows XP. Why did the other benchies scale ? just not 05 ? Running again on the other bench XP right now...

I'll try the different dividers with SLI 05 Andre... keep you guys posted... weird that 3 runs are producing such a low score in SLI...

I hooked up the M4E and I still get a very low score with SLI in 3DMArk05... got no idea what is up... EDIT : OS is borked, reran the tests, other scores remain in line, 05 goes up to 41.3K now