Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

TaPaKaH

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3673

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    31

 Content Type 

Everything posted by TaPaKaH

  1. TaPaKaH
    screenshot fail
  2. TaPaKaH
    how high can you run uncore on air with same cpu/mod?
  3. TaPaKaH
    use more vcore
  4. TaPaKaH
    Can the mems do 10-10-10 at these clocks?
  5. TaPaKaH
    Given my experience, average PSC should run 1000 5-6-5 and 1100 5-7-5. Not bad, but good Hypers can run above 1000 6-6-5 tight on air so PSC no neeeeed.
  6. TaPaKaH
    This is 8Pack, there is always a second screenshot with the right tabs that he managed to take :D
  7. TaPaKaH
    still ~230MHz to go
  8. TaPaKaH
    you, again?
  9. TaPaKaH
    nice sandbags
  10. TaPaKaH
    Heil Massman!
  11. TaPaKaH
    sold, can be closed and moved
  12. TaPaKaH
    still available
  13. TaPaKaH
    "seems legit"
  14. TaPaKaH
    "11st"
  15. TaPaKaH
    yoohoo, a golden cup!
  16. TaPaKaH
    These are no Ripjaws 4, captain
  17. TaPaKaH
    retail power!
  18. TaPaKaH
    Experienced same behavior on 5960X today, benching 5700+MHz was easy within first 10min of session but after a couple of crashes could not even run 5500 no matter what. Is pulling the pot to +20 and back to near-CB sufficient or you have to remount the whole setup?
  19. TaPaKaH
    why not make the last submitter win? think about it, everyone will try to get as close to the deadline as possible but 1s too late and you're out
  20. TaPaKaH
    dat NB
  21. TaPaKaH
    monster hexacore
  22. TaPaKaH
    Tell me more about Windows FLP 2006
  23. TaPaKaH
    Can you post the IHS picture?
  24. TaPaKaH
    I somehow believe that Lam's claimed 11467 is alright. I thought I knew wPrime quite well but after seeing his livestream (where he was also consistently showing 115xx) I managed to gain 0.047-0.063s with my setup at 4.5GHz by using some things that he did (my 12034 run was far from optimised, I am now able to do low-116xx with a dedicated OS). This works out at ~200 in PP, which is his distance from second best efficiency, which is Splave's 11667.
  25. TaPaKaH
    Can somebody please test is sub-23700 PP is reliably reproducable on this platform also at lower clocks? (i.e. is tweakable and not a "lucky run" bug) Theoretically, there would be nothing too suspicious about this score as results with similar (or better) efficiency are present in the same ranking (link, link, link, link). But looking at T.Rex's other results (one with normal efficiency, one with too good efficiency) this might well be a bug.
×
×
  • Create New...