Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

nedernakker

Members
  • Posts

    568
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by nedernakker

  1. ^will get an update on that cpu upcoming week, it's coming my way
  2. neither did I, so you could guess my smile when i found out at home
  3. Thanks for clearing that up.. dat was a big typo.. already adjusted
  4. thanks, no 7970 fun tomorrow. wil be doing SLI 580 lightning after 2D
  5. this is the max with +300 mV I don't feel comfortable pushing more under only SS, I don't want to kill it. Since I am cpu bottled here adding more clocks on the GPU does not help the score that much card does 1000 @ +200 mV on air, think it's average. 'real' results wil come when i go cold.
  6. he reported my co captains vantage score too, also physx... don't know what he's up to..
  7. his memory runs at low frequency with crap timings, physics score also depends on which version of 3dmark 11 you are running. next to that this OS is not optimized for benching, it is a review os with lots of extra games/apps installed on it
  8. why do you think ther is something wrong? score seems ok, your cpu is just not powerfull enough to provide 3 cards from data
  9. ok, could be then. Was just wondering since i recently toyed around with a GTX 580 on aircooling @ 1000/1200 MHz and an 3770K @ 6400 MHz and without that much tweaking it gave me 502K score, since your cpu is running so much faster it could be a normal increase pure from the cpu clocks.
  10. are you sure the core clock isn't real? new Nvidia drivers prevent 1000 MHz+ clocks on GTX 5** and lower series. nice score!
  11. yeah so? what do you want to say with that? the GPU-z readout is also wrong, teh actual boost speed seems to be 1250 MHz when logging the clocks. so tell me, what should I fill in at those clocks...
  12. don't forget it's the wrong version of superpi too
×
×
  • Create New...