cbjaust
-
Posts
646 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
6
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by cbjaust
-
-
Validation requirement is a screenshot compliant with the rules: https://hwbot.org/news/14880_application_255_rules subject to any extra requirement listed on the competition page: https://hwbot.org/competition/Challenger 2019 Division I round 3/stage/4763_superposition_1080p_extreme
-
-
It's Windows 10 though and therefore not compliant with the rules.
-
so, just to re-iterate and to be sure, ALL entries for UL/Futuremark based staged require a VALID link on the UL/Futuremark results site, yeah?
-
-
1 hour ago, unityofsaints said:
Yes this is kind of an odd case - even though multiple subs are allowed per user in Dogpile, multiple results on the same CPU by the same user are not allowed. This means that e.g. on 960T if you want 4c, 5c and 6c results to count towards the stage total they need to be subbed by 3 different users.
I don't think that would be the case. it appears that only the best score of any given CPU counts for the stage. So if there was a 4 cores active score from a 960T by one user, a 6 cores active 960T result from a teammate would replace the 4 cores active score. Even a better 4 cores active score by teammate would replace the the first score.
-
1
-
1
-
-
Another crap nVidia "feature" that apparently doesn't work properly. On the AMD side, Virtual Super Resolution works fine and can be set before or after the run is done as does Eyefinity. Heh.
2560x1600 is enough for R20, 4 CPUz and the BenchMate result window.
-
20 minutes ago, Noxinite said:
Well, technically there is no rules page for the benchmark.
So only the "General Rules - Section 2.1 General Verification Rules" should be applied (as well as the specific competition rules).
Not true, the CB20 rules have been rolled into the CB15 page:
-
@_mat_You have to remove that functionality for the next release, yeah?
-
55 minutes ago, Dead Things said:
Can anybody point me in the right direction to download and old version of Benchmark with Geekbench for Stage 4.1?
That was Geekbench 3. There's a link to it on a thread on here somewhere.
-
11 hours ago, _mat_ said:
I will build some old systems and see if I can reproduce it there. It's a very weird problem, but only some platforms and Windows 7 are affected. I'm sure we are going to find the cause. Thanks for your input, very much appreciated!
Btw, another issue has been reported with CINEBENCH and realtime process priority. Scores run in realtime can't be validated due to a kernel bug. Please run with High priority instead to make valid results for now. I'm looking into it.
do you mean the Shield with the green tick validated? I just ran CB R15 and R20 Realtime and got the green tick both times:
4241138_cbjaust_cinebench_r15_with_benchmate_ryzen_5_3600x_1748_cb
4241120_cbjaust_cinebench_r20_with_benchmate_ryzen_5_3600x_3933_pts
Also if you need older platforms tested, I'd be happy to help: My Hardware Library
-
No worries.
-
Have a Gigabyte GA-K8NF-9, would that suit?
-
Usual benchmark rules apply as far as OS goes: Win 10 only allowed for Systems with no bclk adjustment and Skylake/Kabylake (and I presume Coffelake and the -X variants)
-
nobody yet and competion is ended.
Best for < 5GHz challenge is 3509155_johan45_superpi___32m_ryzen_7_1700x_7min_5sec_101ms
Best at open clocks is 4225032_karta_superpi___32m_ryzen_9_3900x_6min_4sec_557ms
Wonder if chew* or zeneffect are bothering with this anymore.
-
5 hours ago, l0ud_sil3nc3 said:
Does the save file validate without a license when doing this?
With GB Tryout there is no save file, the result gets uploaded directly to the GB Browser: http://browser.geekbench.com/geekbench3/8687747 note the version is Geekbench 3.4.2 Tryout for Windows x86 (64-bit)
This is the hwbot entry: 3950119_cbjaust_geekbench3___multi_core_phenom_ii_x6_1100t_be_12152_points/
-
hwbot.org/hardware/processor/athlon_64_3200_plus_winchester/
The page for this CPU states the default frequency is 2200MHz. This is not correct. THe default frequency is in fact 2000MHz. Maximum multiplier for this CPU is 10x.
Thanks
www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/K8/AMD-Athlon 64 3200+ - ADA3200DIK4BI (ADA3200BIBOX)
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_AMD_Athlon_64_microprocessors#"Winchester"_(D0,_90_nm)
-
1
-
-
How would Primate labs even know if a result had been run under the security of BenchMate anyway? Sounds to me like BenchMate is doing his precious database a service.
-
have you had a look here in the benchmark twerk thread?
-
good to see some publicity on the timer issues with Win8/10. even if it is and inside job so to speak. might have to get splave to put in a new benchmate screenshot without the Geekbenches in it.
-
1
-
1
-
-
Can the geekbnech browser distinguish between a vanilla run and a run using BenchMate integration? Also re: wPrime, the author has up to v2.10 dated 08-Jul-2013 would you include the newest version? Also the author of wPrime is somewhat active on the OCAU forums, he is user wwwww there (not sure if an account is needed to see member profiles, probably).
Keep up the good work.
-
I got the email from John Poole of Primate Labs with the GB5 upgrade key and after reading the above I replied to that email suggesting he reconsider his position given that I for one wouldn't have bought GB3 if not for hwbot, nor would I have bought GB4 if not for Benchmate. I won't be giving Primate Labs any money in future unless their position changes. I also suggested that Primate Labs should be supportive of hwbot and BenchMate for driving sales of geekbench. Heh
-
3
-
2
-
-
11 hours ago, _mat_ said:
I've just encountered a strange synchronization bug on Ryzen with the new Geekbench 5 integration. As I've looked further I realized that instead of using the QueryPerformanceCounter() function about 2000 to 3000 times like in Geekbench 3 and 4, it's used about 14 million times during the same duration. I really don't know what to say other than that's incredibly stupid and obviously completely unnecessary.
So there is a contention bug currently showing only on AMD CPUs in BenchMate 0.9.1 + Geekbench 5. I've already fixed it and will upload an update in a few minutes or so.
Is that something GB does by itself or is it to do with the BenchMate integration?
If it's the former, what's the bet our friends at Intel bought and paid for the GB update?
-
Is this a competition entry or a normal entry? Pre populate doesn't work for competition entries using the submit button specific to each benchmark stage. The only time you can pre populate and get a score into a comp is when you get a competition pop up after you've entered a score with the main submit button in the normal way. Team Cup doesn't apparently have the popup function enabled.
The official Challenger 2019 Division I round 3 thread.
in HWBOT Competitions
Posted · Edited by cbjaust
Oh, right. I hadn't yet had a go at adding an entry for Superposition. Sounds like a configuration error. @Leeghoofd
The "Challenger 2019 Division III round 3 6-cores only copy - Unigine Superposition - 1080P Xtreme" stage is a normal screenshot upload form.