TASOS
-
Posts
1528 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
37
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Posts posted by TASOS
-
-
According to the XTU profile this benchmark run was done with 44x multiplier.
-
I was ready to report the user "Team Captain" for spam.
-
On the 15th the competition started, but there's an advantage to the active HWBOT members because we don't do an official announcement.
The official announcement/email/social stuff follows on 1st of August.
So , you decited to give ranking and points , to a particular stage , before official announcement ?
And users await for their full competition review on August 1st ?
And that's concidered a good-smart idea ?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soft_launchWhatever you do, do not look up at Urban Dictionary..... just saying.
From the link you provided , i assume that i had undesdood - translated correctly the overview text of the team cup.
"soft launch is the release .... to a limited audience"
"hard launch is making it generally available or else grand opening"
What more can i say ?
Have a nice competition.
-
.....
If English is your native language , can you please define "soft launch" ?
What i can tell you nevertheless is , that ...
A bad idea will always be a bad idea
Wrong will always be wrong.
I would appreciate , if somebody could explain to me , what the following text in the picture means , in plain English.
Today we soft-launch the Team Cup 2015feel free to check out the stages. The competition runs until 30/09 but beware: the stages close at different times and some require immediate attention.
Full overview and details on 01/08. Let the games begin!
Looks like i'm asking too much.
or
Nobody here has English as native language.
-
Not any more, but that is the way the stage was designed. I would argue that if a team was created one day before the competition, it might be the ONLY stage it had a chance of winning. The other 29 stages are heavily biased towards large teams, lots of hardware/sponsored teams, and those teams that are able to gather and share LN2 costs, etc. Should we start handicapping teams that have an advantage in some way. Perhaps if a team is based in a small country, perhaps of 132,000 square kilometers, they should get an automatic reduction in points because of how geographically close they are. I mean we are concerned with this new team being created right?
I honestly, could care less if they give everyone the same points or not, but the overview quite clearly states their was a stage that was time sensitive. If a team missed that clue, followed by the fact that only one stage was open, then why complain about it now? Sour grapes?
We are not transmitting at the same band.
Our frequencies are very far apart.
I have the feeling that you are trying to convince me that the original blackboard is white.
If English is your native language , can you please define "soft launch" ?
What i can tell you nevertheless is , that ...
A bad idea will always be a bad idea
Wrong will always be wrong.
I would appreciate , if somebody could explain to me , what the following text in the picture means , in plain English.
-
Are you boycotting the stage then? Why not get a score up while there are still some good points to be had? I mean its not F1 racing, TechSweden hasn't won it already.
I'm pretty sure it was intentional so I don't see it getting changed.
Have you read my previous post ?
I think i made my self clear enough , about the reasons that are wrong.
Can you please answer my question below ?
A new team created today , wants to participate to Team Cup.
Do they have a chance to fight for 1st place in this stage ?
-
Please fix the problem with this stage-6
http://oc-esports.io/#!/round/team_cup_2015_sc2/2365/cloud_gate_target:_250
Give the same points , to whoever , gets the target score or change the whole stage project.
-
Because everyone can do it?
Not because of that.
Because of it's ranking system.
1st submission get's the top ranking and all the rest get nothing (i mean less and less points).
At least that's what i see right now.
Country cup is not a speedy competition with a narrow time frame.
All teams must have a reasonable time to prepare and a fair chance to fight for 1st place.
You cant write , that there is a soft launch at 15/07/2015
Then wait for full throttle at 01/08/2015.
The stage ends 15/09/2015
But the top ranking goes to the 1st submission.
Come on.
Where does it say that this is a time frame stage ?
LimitationsA verification screenshot is required.
Please attach a picture of your overclocking rig.
Only submissions made on or after 2015-07-15 are allowed.
Official Team Cup 2015 background mandatory (for stages with screenshot verification): download
-
The target score stage , is a fail , for this kind of competition.
Think about it.
-
In such "home-made" systems , you cant really tell , what king of gas was used.
NL11F is a small compressor , designed for R134A gas but it can tolerate an R404A gas.
R507 is a bit more brutal gas , and some people chose it , to gain 4-5C lower temps.
But you need more cooling power down to the heat exchanger.
If your problem is minor , you can give your phase-change a tiny blind zip of R404 and see if things get better.
-
All this situation , is overclocking history beeing lost.
But , we have to accept that person's decision.
I'm pretty sure that Sam keeps a good file with his results and records.
So , if he changes his mind ... he will bring them back.
Now , regarding the top scores beeing lost (for both Karl and sam), you can create a small text area , in each hardware category , with a mention part , such us : sam.ocx not participating at hwbot rankings had a top score of xxxxx
That'a a thought.
-
I can't find them on ebay anywhere, only the C10 model. The model I have is C9
This kind (2400CL9) of memory kit , even though it's used , often have a price tag more than a brand new 2400CL10 kit.
Furthermore since 2400 CL9-11-11 kit sure is well binned Samsung chips they keep a high price rate.
Also consider that , you cant find such speed spec anymore.
I dont know what you paid for it.
But i personally bought the same ram kit , early 2013 @ 124.00 euro.
-
It reads to me just as a spelling correction from 660GT to 6600GT, the sli bit would still be as per original.
Author: SDougal
..........
..........
Round 4: July 1st - August 31st
Link: http://oc-esports.io/#!/round/osibs_round4
Stage 1: 3DMark05, Limitations: AMD AM2 processors and LGA775 processors (excl ?Core?) / GeForce 6600GT
Stage 2: MaxxMem Read Bandwidth, Limitations: VIA KT133A Chipset only
This is from the link above.
-
Can you link to the thread - might have missed it
Have a look here
http://forum.hwbot.org/showthread.php?t=131285
Look at the description of the contest at the top of the page.
Also look at the post Antinomy made.
I have the impression that we settled at single 6600GT.
-
Just pointed out an other fact , to take into consideration for future events.
That's why , there must always be wallpapers for each event.
As for the exact submission i am talking about , in my opinion , things are pretty clear.
-
A bench-result run on April but submitted June , is considered valid ?
-
Yeah, 6600GT. Fixed it on the site
Good luck guys!!
I cant clearly recall , but i think we had agreed on single 6600GT for this stage.
Can somebody please clarify ?
-
Ah, yeah I added it because it showed up in the Hardware Database under 7870 XT
You must delete it , before people start submit results into that category.
As i already wrote , "XT" is just a Sapphire model , that defines their 7870 tahiti based card.
-
Just noticed something that looks weird (in my opinion).
A team takes 3rd place in both stages ... and finishes 5th overall
???
-
Somebody added this vga type (recently) ?
http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/radeon_hd_7870_xt_tahiti_core/
Why ?
We already had it added
http://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/radeon_hd_7870_tahiti_core/
"XT" is just the Sapphire mark for the tahiti based 7870's
-
//edit: not my place ...
Can you be more specific ?
-
Tough situation.
Keep trying.
-
Guys do not resubmit old scores, keeping an eye on some people atm here.
I removed about 6 from the contest, all dating before 06-06-2015
RULE IS Only submissions made on or after 2015-06-06 are allowed.
Don't mess with this old guy
I even see top ranking members , NOT considering your advice at the moment.
Not talking abour Novice only , same goes for Challenger series too.
?
-
Download the latest version (5.2.0) of XTU and give it a try.
You currently have version 4.4.0
https://downloadcenter.intel.com/download/24075/Intel-Extreme-Tuning-Utility-Intel-XTU-
MSI 7970 Lightning stock cooler needed
in Sold
Posted
Do you have the backplate ?