-
Posts
393 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by coolhand411
-
xMec - Core i3 6320 @ 4010MHz - 743 marks XTU
coolhand411 replied to marc0053's topic in Result Discussions
hardcore patience achievement unlocked ,great job man ! -
Johnd0e - Core i3 6320 @ 4020MHz - 743 marks XTU
coolhand411 replied to marc0053's topic in Result Discussions
nice ,congrats ! -
Lets talk about 32m Low Clock Challenges
coolhand411 replied to Splave's topic in Benchmark software
is this the best way you know how to engage in conversation, what's so funny dude ? -
Lets talk about 32m Low Clock Challenges
coolhand411 replied to Splave's topic in Benchmark software
^^ don't know where this "vendor war " comes from ,just because you have to name particular vendor to make your point doesn't mean you want to start some "war" ...no one is defending or accusing any vendors just stating facts ,bottom line is there is nothing wrong with SPI or XTU but the HW you using....062 bclk increment in comparison to say .01 will make a big difference -
Lets talk about 32m Low Clock Challenges
coolhand411 replied to Splave's topic in Benchmark software
just to clarify "step" ,I end up booting Gene just to make sure ,on ASUS there is more bclk options ,you can bump it in .01 increments in comparison to the the other vendor where you have 100/100.062/100.125 ...100.062 reaches just over the 5003 limit where on Asus last one would be 100.06 -
Lets talk about 32m Low Clock Challenges
coolhand411 replied to Splave's topic in Benchmark software
if you under 5003 in both CPU and mem screen I would assume it's legit ,hopefully some of Bot reps can confirm -
Lets talk about 32m Low Clock Challenges
coolhand411 replied to Splave's topic in Benchmark software
exactly this ,if we stick to the rules we wouldn't have this problem in the first place ,the moment they allowed higher cache was when you/me start doing it wrong @Splave this screenshots don't prove much ,some a lazy screens (first screen shows both CPU/mem over the limit,second is just lazy-if he waited long enough he would prolly be able to get them both under 5003 or drop one step and still within efficiency,this is one of the quirks of Skylake and I don't thing it could be corrected (clamped on fluctuation ) -
Lets talk about 32m Low Clock Challenges
coolhand411 replied to Splave's topic in Benchmark software
no ..Asus don't have a "100.0625 step" that's why you never see anyone going over 5003 on Asus , next step is 100.125=way over the limit and since ASRock does have it almost all ASRock subs come 5004.9 or higher cache since it's so difficult to control/cheat/print screen with the fluctuation on both (CPU/Memory), higher bclk (102.xx) is more manageable on both boards that's why all subs with higher bclk are on equal playing field,you see the advantage/willing to take a chance on Mocf by going near max with that stupid 100.062/different step (bios shows 5003 or 5004 -depends from bios) and you hope you can take that winning screene right bro ? ..as you can see it's not SPI you need to change or blame but BIOS P.S. maybe instead of blame game you should talk to Nick ..like two ASRock reps and get this fixed -
Problems with Intel XTU and Windows 7 SP1
coolhand411 replied to iDevilCore's topic in Submission & member moderation
set your time and date both in bios and OS to the current time,make sure SP1 is installed also,hope this helps -
Lets talk about 32m Low Clock Challenges
coolhand411 replied to Splave's topic in Benchmark software
hahah...why you want to kill it now bro ?..why didn't you bring this to attention few months back when we all knew that the bclk fluctuates that much ? mater of a fact is I think you were the first one to submit with cache at 104.9,this was well known fact ,you didn't had the problem while sitting on ES modules and leading 5.0 challenge ,yes I agree that changes could be made if we all agree but lets start with the next chip-set...or remove all subs with cache above 103 ,no one is cheating man ,you just haven't found the golden setting yet that's all "xtu a well know bugged benchmark"..I don't thinks so ,just because you can't match something it doesn't mean it's bugged,as of now I hit 5x742 on two different boards and 2x743 on Mocf with the same timings ,it doesn't look "bugged" in my opinion and what about all the boards with 102.7 bclk limit ..maybe they should remove all the subs above that limit ? -
in order for this board to be considered retail it needs to be available/sold via online store (dirct buy includeed) to anyone no matter how many will be produced- sold ,it would also have to be covered by warranty,otherwise it's ES ,I'm not trying to crap on you parade Peter but lets be honest HWBOT is bending the rules any time it gets the chance P.S. if you want to remove my post like you did in other "ES" thread go ahead..I know who you are
-
GalaxOCLab - Core i7 6700K @ 7005MHz - 9sec 30ms PiFast
coolhand411 replied to Noxinite's topic in Result Discussions
wallpaper material ,to bad it's not 1080p,congrats Mad -
coolhandluke41 - Core i3 6320 @ 4020MHz - 743 marks XTU
coolhand411 replied to Alan_Alberino's topic in Result Discussions
half an hour with the right timings -
coolhandluke41 - Core i3 6320 @ 4020MHz - 743 marks XTU
coolhand411 replied to Alan_Alberino's topic in Result Discussions
Thank you everyone @ zero ..nope -
zeropluszero - Core i3 6320 @ 4000MHz - 743 marks XTU
coolhand411 replied to newlife's topic in Result Discussions
I just wish I could see Matt face when he hit that #,congrats