Antinomy

Have you tried using my BIOS in P4P800SE? I'd recommend to disable integrated peripherals as well - audio, COM and other stuff. According to the datasheet, this one works only for IGP, so I didn't take it out.

Nice score but wrong screenshot

Keep pushing it! Very nice scores these days!

They kinda always say that. But we can check full build number and guess from that.

Here's a working one - you use latest CPU-Z (or CPU-Z vintage) version for submitting frequency reference scores and you back off from peoples old results that aren't obviously bugged.

Why should I put a "_" in it's name? It's called TX97-XE, like it should.

I can. Rename to what? Seems fine to me:

added: https://hwbot.org/hardware/motherboard/machcreator_nl5xru/

https://hwbot.org/rules?referenceId=5258

If you have a programmer or a board to hotflash, give it a try. IIRC, the 865/875 were compatible between generations. The first generation P4P800 with P4C800 is gen1 and P4P800SE with P4C800-E are gen2. I do have a P4P800 SE but haven't tested it yet.

You have to mod the ME region that is responsible for clock configuration. Then it's just XTU. Firmware mod. https://www.techinferno.com/index.php?/forums/topic/1624-lets-enable-overclocking-on-all-6-and-7-series-laptops/

Hello @Freakezoit, I would very much like to hear of this legit tweak that gives more than 100% boost with basically same clocks: https://hwbot.org/submission/840529_freakezoit_3dmark2001_se_mirage_3_(sis_670671771)_2658_marks @Leeghoofd, what do you think?

added: https://hwbot.org/hardware/videocard/radeon_hd_4670_gddr4/

Do you have a GPU-Z screenshot?

Great score!

No specific, just logical sense. On your picture I think 1366 + 370 doesn't look good. I think apples to apples would be good enough - AMD with AMD, Intel with Intel, relative sockets together or by date. Say: 1366+1156, 775+771, 478+370, 939+462, 441+S1 if we stick to current socket count. Also, MSI+Gigabyte together. And Intel, AMD, NVIDIA, ATI on one row. Oh, and this looks broken:

Yep, less pages to scroll, more informative for each one.

Any chance to stick my sugesstions about hardware pages too? I believe they don't change time response but they do improve usability.

You replace the input frequency of 14.318MHz that goes to PLL with a custom one. This shifts all the clocks from the PLL. Breaking the timer, USB, floppy. Thus, you need to provide stock 14.318 (system timer), 24MHz (floppy?) and 48MHz (USB) as well to maintain these while other frequencies go up. You shift only the base clock, the board's PLL does the rest. Nope, should work with pretty much any PLL.

I believe it's still on beta on my drives I'll try to clean it up and post. BX133-RAID as well.

Excellent choice. They are voltage limited to +0.4V IIRC, but this can be fixed with a BIOS mod.

Great score for such clocks! Keep pushing

There's been a bug back in the days when a P2 with disabled cache was identified as a Celly. This has led to fake categories like Celeron 350 (FSB100) and so on. This bug has been reported by me to Franck and CPU-Z got fixed (I had screenshots with fixed and non-fixed versions and can say when this happened, IIRC, around 2009). And Turrican deleted those fake categories. But some results remained erroneous. You can PM me with links, I'll throw them where they belong (P2 despite disabled cache).

Looking forward to see some 01SE Rocket lake lovin'

Guess I'm on fire these days. In order to run 3DMark99 on XP I've been using this well known patch: But since I'm lazy, I wanted to integrate it right in the installer so you get a patched benchmark from start. So this is 3DMark99 installer patched for XP, no other files needed. Enjoy. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1fDjIUUfsIWsOZ1_-a0xs5dInId68zRJZ/view?usp=sharing I think @Leeghoofd could put it in HWBot storage and put a link on benchmark's page.