Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

FireKillerGR

Members
  • Posts

    1749
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    26

Everything posted by FireKillerGR

  1. No - should be our 2nd best (according to previous 3d tests & gpupi runs). Will test what should be our best one tomorrow
  2. haha thanks guys. :D Was just testing the card and thought to have some 03 fun
  3. For sale a KPC Venom Red. Barely used bought, less than a year ago. Selling to upgrade to Trex Price 200€ + shipping
  4. @richba5tard check this here: http://hwbot.org/submission/3770796_rsannino_geekbench4___single_core_core_i7_8700k_9746_points/ Also my 3rd place score lost like 20-30 points without an actual change in rankings (doubt its just me) Were changes made on how much points some benchmarks get? There have been other drops without rank changes over the past 2 days.
  5. if you think that a score has bugged points you hit recalculate and check it after 2-3 mins to see if it has changed. No need to do it for all your scores if there is no actual reason.
  6. these scores had wrong points 2h ago (before) and got correct points after recalculation (after) Last one even had the correct points yesterday but went to "Before" status at some point. Fixed almost instantly with recalculation.
  7. It is a common issue that some benchmarks/scores go pointless (or lose points) out of nowhere. 2nd or 3rd time in a week that this happened and managed to spot it due to general ranking change. To get them fixed I needed to spot them and click recalculation to get the points back. Some examples that I noticed today: Before: http://prntscr.com/j62e9w After: http://prntscr.com/j62eh5 Before: http://prntscr.com/j62exx After: http://prntscr.com/j62f3n Before: http://prntscr.com/j62g09 After: http://prntscr.com/j62g6m Can we have something to get this fixed? Like a metric that checks the top10 scores of each benchmark and compares with specific set targets? ie. R15 1st place has to be above 150p. If not an automatic recalculation would take place. Ideally there would be able to log the "last good state" points to have them as a baseline for this comparison. @richba5tard
  8. and losing on 3D so eventually they are not like 25% on the overall score
  9. is it needed? batch doesnt work?
  10. Score deleted. My mistake to submit a score that is useless to us (ranking-wise or w/e) and give the chance to random people to step in
  11. "United States SPLAVE SAYS: 33 minutes ago – Sorry if i made controversy on your result. Surely it is allowed as rules state nothing. Nice run! " It's ok. Unfortunately, on purpose or not, the whole thing "undermines" a message or confuses things in a negative way towards me and Phil. Personally, I would appreciate if you had come and asked via a fb pm about it. It only confuses things even more if someones considers that the moment this was posted, we have been chatting about other hw/benching related stuff.
  12. I completely agree regarding 03 as we did gt2 test with and without cable yday and it got like 300+ FPS without it. On aquamark I don't think you get like 20% but will retest soon in other OS.
  13. If system rendered no image why I didn't get the WR? Any chances it might be working in a different way than 03?
  14. Yeah its with unplug but without crashing or whatever. I believe its allowed since known scores with this are still up. Funny thing tho, is that it seems like GT1-2 are higher on Win7 than on other OS while other GTs kinda suck.
×
×
  • Create New...