K404

Crazy voltage for the MHz! Nice FSB

Restricted access

Thanks Karl

http://hwbot.org/community/submission/1025002_k404_3dmark03_geforce_8800_gt_512_mb_60294_marks?tab=more I tried a forced recalculation, it didn't do anything. Will this fix itself the next time the results server updates itself? Thanks

Thanks Futuremark

But Karl is beating you in post count Thanks guys

Final noob question (well for tonight, I think)... if it's 25 results to get the award, do I need to submit pictures to 25 results? The obvious answer would be yes, but "picture required" is a bit open Thanks

ok I'll see if I have any pics of Massman on my computer I'll upload a couple pics (Edit: of... not Massman) Thanks guys!

Do the pictures have to be checked by mods? Y'know... is this a picture of ice or a radiator etc

The achievements for cooling... CPU subzero, GPU subzero and something watercooled.... how do I get them? I saw "Picture required" but... what do I do? Do I really need to start posting pictures of my subzero sessions... does anyone not know about my dice + watercooling addiction?

I've never ran either of them I remember "back in the day" I wanted to D/L 3DMark 03. I didn't know there was more than one and I got 3DMark01 by mistake. In disgust, I deleted it

If FM can detect hardware sharing if given a nod towards which scores to look at, i'm all for it. As for companies rejecting RMA for proven hardcore overclocking.... why should we ever complain? It's against warranty, we should take responsibility for our actions. As for the OP itself, as I posted on XS, please can you answer the following: Will this mean that people who use the free version of 3D05 will NOT be able to see their scores? Will it still be possible to buy 3DMark05? (if there will be no support, I actually hope NOT) Will all existing submitted scores be deleted? (3D05 is the most important one here as 3D01 and 03 will show a score... ORB validation is a separate issue. What is HWBots stance on using cracked copies of 3DM05 so that users can see their scores? Do FM understand that this decision, as it stands, will mess with competitive benchmarking?

ok Will add more detail in future. I dispute the pro part though..... I'm not going to The Old Firm game, no. I also avoid town in the evening afterwards... atmosphere is BAD... suburbs are worse. I advise it to no-one. I know life-long fans & Season Ticket holders for both clubs and they avoid it too.

Who? Me? *sweet innocent face* I try to only report when i'm sure Theres a couple I really cant make my mind up about.

I see/ report a LOT of scores that have been run on Vista or 7 and have bugged scores. For the benefit of result mods, would HWB consider adding in a special warning to users to make sure they check their scores + sub-test FPS to make sure they all make sense and are in line with other scores?

I mentioned this months ago and no-one believed me

Well... to base it on rankings, there's already an award for HWB top 20. Plus e.g. Sampsa is miles off the top 20.. doesn't make him less special

:p Thomas is too crazy to make people nervous..... his avatar is him humping an LN2 ranger! You aren't humble towards me You treat me like crap on MSN

I was nervous meeting Petri, Elmor and Massman. Shamino, Vince, OPB, Fredyama-san, Hipro, Mav, Sampsa, JonnyGuru, Tin... there's others, but if I knew I was about to meet those guys, i'd go "whoa"

Never bench with Massman, His magical touch brings CBB to -50

Hey bro Is that my old chip?

Yea, at a group session once the CPU is running nicely, its much easier to switch GPUs and keep going than stop, defrost, switch xyz and start again. Theres a LOT of scores on the bot where that's clearly the case (hopefully nothing less legal)

@PJ Well... I cant argue or dispute any of that.. sadly I dont have an answer for it either. I dont want to see a load hand-picked teams so everyone can be awesome without much category overlap and I dont want to see newcomers utterly sidelined Total aside.... if this is NDA, thats no problem. Futuremark.... how willing are they to play ball with the info we don't see on the ORB? Without asking what info is there, Could it be used to deal with at least some of the hardware sharing problems we have now? At least deal with the major stuff?

in reply to part of that, I ignored the PowerTeam part because it favours only the best score Anything that involves the PowerTeam formula can basically be classed as "not good for new benchers." Alternative 3 throws a very small carrot to them. One guy in the team might get 50 points for a submission, the next-best guy will contribute 3.9 points to the team MAXIMUM I'm not seeing ANY difference between alternative 3 and alternative 5. Best team score= PowerTeam points??? Alternative 1: "PowerTeams" - best team score per ranking (global/hardware) - amount of participating teams (determines weight) => Team Points = SUM(PowerTeam points) + : completely removes the benefits from hardware sharing on a team level - : reduces the 'team spirit' as newcomers have very little to add to the team total ________________________ I'll dissect the rest of the post and all the numbers when i've finished scraping my brain off the screen

Alternative 3: "PowerTeam and User Points" (detailed explanation on why PowerTeam ranking is a good thing) The latest suggested solution combining the two leagues of alternative 2 into one single algorithm, ranking teams based on the following variables: - Team quality: -- best team score in ranking (global/hardware) -- amount of participating teams (weight) - Member quality: -- % of global, hardware and competition points attributed to team total. Example was worked out here: link => Team Points = SUM(PowerTeam points) + [sUM(user points) / 10] ______________________________ sum of user points/ 10 contributes to team score? I *think* my example is correct?? If i've got the interpretation wrong twice in quick succession... umm...... maybe the ideas need re-worded. If i'm getting this wrong, I.....doubt i'm the only one. (excuse the ego)