-
Posts
71 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Blogs
Everything posted by drnip
-
MDTek - Core i5 2500K @ 7711.9MHz - 4min 24sec 352ms SuperPi 32m
drnip replied to Gautam's topic in Result Discussions
Rofl -
Like?
-
Being once as a fellow team mate I would have thought that you would have at least contacted them thru PM asking any questions you might have had before jumping to the extreme like you did here and starting a thread like this. You know these two individuals and what they are capable of benching wise as well as hardware wise. I guess I thought more of you Honda.
-
HAHAHA I love it.
-
Splave - Core i7 2600K @ 5808.7MHz - 5808.73 mhz CPU-Z
drnip replied to zeneffect's topic in Result Discussions
Nice chip my man! -
Sandy Bridge 2500K/2600K Batch and Serial Numbers
drnip replied to Massman's topic in Sandy Bridge (P67/Z68) OC
Hmmm, you must of missed my post #84 of my chip. http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=92663&postcount=84 Either way new high for me: 2600k 5640.6 MHz Batch # - L041B229 Serial # - 1422 http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/2123096_drnip_cpu_z_core_i7_2600k_5640.57_mhz EDIT: I found it. You have mine under L041B299 whereas mine is L041B229. -
DrNip - Core i7 2600K @ 5600MHz - 13.3 sec PiFast
drnip replied to Splave's topic in Result Discussions
I know right? -
steponz - Core i7 2600K @ 5746.8MHz - 5min 53sec 984ms SuperPi 32m
drnip replied to Kal-EL's topic in Result Discussions
Nice! -
DrNip - Core i7 2600K @ 5500MHz - 13.49 sec PiFast
drnip replied to steponz's topic in Result Discussions
Ran out of time. Will visit it again. -
DrNip - Core i7 2600K @ 5600.2MHz - 5600.2 mhz CPU-Z
drnip replied to steponz's topic in Result Discussions
Thank ya, thank ya. -
Sandy Bridge 2500K/2600K Batch and Serial Numbers
drnip replied to Massman's topic in Sandy Bridge (P67/Z68) OC
May the overclocking gods shine down on your chip splave. -
DrNip - Core i7 2600K @ 5500.2MHz - 5500.22 mhz CPU-Z
drnip replied to rickss69's topic in Result Discussions
Better not look at my 5.6ghz submission then, rofl. -
Sandy Bridge 2500K/2600K Batch and Serial Numbers
drnip replied to Massman's topic in Sandy Bridge (P67/Z68) OC
L041B229 - 5.5ghz boot so far. http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1629011 EDIT: 5.6ghz boot. http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1630881 -
steponz - Core i7 2600K @ 5754.4MHz - 5min 59sec 718ms SuperPi 32m
drnip replied to thebanik's topic in Result Discussions
Sub 6 AAGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!! -
DrNip - Core i7 920 @ 5153.2MHz - 7min 2sec 360ms SuperPi 32m
drnip replied to Splave's topic in Result Discussions
Yeah I wish I could get this setup back now. I know I could smash this time with a sub 7. -
Alex"H@Nter"Klein - Pentium 4 651 @ 7924.5MHz - 7924.54 mhz CPU-Z
drnip replied to TaPaKaH's topic in Result Discussions
She has 8 in her. Damn China chips rock! -
Alex"H@Nter"Klein - Pentium 4 651 @ 7911.2MHz - 7911.22 mhz CPU-Z
drnip replied to TaPaKaH's topic in Result Discussions
Nice! Almost 8. -
Splave - Core i7 980X @ 6213.1MHz - 2sec 593ms wPrime 32m
drnip replied to DOM.'s topic in Result Discussions
All the hard work and chip after chip finally pays out in the end. Congrats bro! I wish everyone could have a success story like this. -
DrNip - Celeron LGA775 352 @ 7680.1MHz - 7680.09 mhz CPU-Z
drnip replied to RedCobra's topic in Result Discussions
Correction, Batch #L645F082. -
DrNip - Celeron LGA775 352 @ 7680.1MHz - 7680.09 mhz CPU-Z
drnip replied to RedCobra's topic in Result Discussions
Thanks. Batch #L645F82. I had a 7.7ghz validation but the check sum was bad on it. P5B Deluxe would shut off if I gave it anymore than 1.96v. Would like to try this chip on a Commando. -
This comment leads me to believe option #6 is pointless. Also leads me to believe it doesn't matter what the masses say but what you say. I could be wrong though as coming across wrong on the internet is easy to do. Just please whatever you do make it stop. Dragging this out thread after thread, post after post, poll after poll, day after day has gotten old quick, fast and in a hurry. Then you have proposed after proposed and then after proposed revision concepts which is doing nothing but confusing everybody. All of this is killing peoples attitudes towards the bot. You might be blind to it all but everybody I have spoke with feels this way and this is across several forums I frequent. I'm with splave on this, do what your going to do and quit asking us and quit dragging us along on this crazy ride. Not trying to be harsh or a dick but just being real.
-
Exactly as I was saying massman. Until you bring a beta we are left to draw our own conclusions and will be stuck on this mary-go-round.
-
That's fine. You feel things need to change then things need to change. Nothing we can do about it. I believe alot of people fear the unknown, fear change and are left to draw there own conclusions on what will be. The majority of these conclusions are probably wrong in the end. You can post mock-up after mock-up, example after example but until you do a trial run and let people see what you are talking about you will have the dilemma that you have in your hands now. Good luck and I hope you work it out.
-
Yes indeed what a strange world we live in and how people don't listen. The general census was to leave it alone and not go with the change but for some reason HWBot keeps starting thread after thread on changing it. Funny how the majority of the peeps are voting #2 and #6. Maybe this thread you will finally listen to the masses and just leave it the way it is. But its ya'lls world and we are just squirrels.