M1RROR Posted December 22, 2019 Share Posted December 22, 2019 v3.0 version show higher score than classic V1.95 its some cheating, need to improve rules Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gtxx58 Posted December 22, 2019 Share Posted December 22, 2019 I redo it if you want ! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gtxx58 Posted December 22, 2019 Share Posted December 22, 2019 This is simple, beat it with v3.0 :) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Remarc Posted December 23, 2019 Share Posted December 23, 2019 to M1RROR this bench is one big bug and very strange why has not it been removed yet Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerraRaptor Posted December 23, 2019 Share Posted December 23, 2019 Just now, Remarc said: this bench is one big bug +100500. I was testing it with Am2 this weekend and get anything from 2500MB/s to 12000MB/s with same settings. No chance to get consistent results at all. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
unityofsaints Posted December 23, 2019 Share Posted December 23, 2019 So I'm guessing tRP didn't help the score? ;) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M1RROR Posted December 23, 2019 Author Share Posted December 23, 2019 I will never use version 3.0, for what? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gtxx58 Posted December 23, 2019 Share Posted December 23, 2019 This is just a cpuz bug, trp is at 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gtxx58 Posted December 23, 2019 Share Posted December 23, 2019 For me it’s pretty consistent from 11600 to 13000, if I considered it as a bug, I’m not submitted it, maybe it’s score higher but I don’t think by 1000. If I compare my results with you terraraptor, on the same setting I do about the same. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TerraRaptor Posted December 23, 2019 Share Posted December 23, 2019 your result is quite in line with others (mine included) so noone blames this is cheat or undoable - I even liked it :) I really like your clocks here. The bench itself sucks. While superpi gives 0.5% spread from from to run this buggy bench gives me +/-xx% difference with intel and +/-xxx% difference with AMD between runs. PS. I decided to skip benching maxmemm2 after review of the following results: 13263 - https://hwbot.org/submission/1020832_ageom_maxxmem_ddr2_sdram_916.6_marks/ 13447 - https://hwbot.org/submission/1022472_armannaddafi_maxxmem_ddr2_sdram_936.2_marks/ 13092 - https://hwbot.org/submission/939077_endea_maxxmem_ddr2_sdram_788.6_marks/  Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gtxx58 Posted December 23, 2019 Share Posted December 23, 2019 I agree with you, on amd side it seem not predictable, the score done with striker, I think it legit, Nvidia chipset is Faster than p45, x48 on memory Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gtxx58 Posted December 23, 2019 Share Posted December 23, 2019 Maybe other memory bench is more accuracy! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noxinite Posted December 23, 2019 Share Posted December 23, 2019 Don't forget that apparently if you run the CPU slower then the bench runs for longer and you get a higher memory score. This bench shoud ideally have points stripped from it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yosarianilives Posted December 23, 2019 Share Posted December 23, 2019 16 minutes ago, Noxinite said: Don't forget that apparently if you run the CPU slower then the bench runs for longer and you get a higher memory score. This bench shoud ideally have points stripped from it. Yeah let's drop this buggy mess Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.