The official Challenger 2022 Div IV Round 1 thread.

[ksateaaa23]

I have only valid url to my cpu max profile(410). I have taken a screenshot with it. will it be accepted. (not submitted) https://www.3dmark.com/cpu/469336

Edited March 21, 2022 by ksateaaa23

[Leeghoofd]

should be good yeah

[ksateaaa23]

Thank you sir.

[moi_kot_lybit_moloko]

i see socket 940 is banned for ddr1 stage. what about socket g34 with 16 core piledriver on this stage?

[yosarianilives]

4 minutes ago, moi_kot_lybit_moloko said:

i see socket 940 is banned for ddr1 stage. what about socket g34 with 16 core piledriver on this stage?

If you get it running ddr1 send pics lmao, but also it's per core scoring 

Edited March 21, 2022 by yosarianilives

[moi_kot_lybit_moloko]

8 minutes ago, yosarianilives said:

If you get it running ddr1 send pics lmao, but also it's per core scoring 

i mean amd stage with ddr3 (division iv)

[Leeghoofd]

Standard rule of the house is no server setups... so I guess there's your answer...

[moi_kot_lybit_moloko]

1 hour ago, Leeghoofd said:

Standard rule of the house is no server setups... so I guess there's your answer...

so, no opteron on 939? its "server" cpu

[Leeghoofd]

I can add that one if needed

 

[moi_kot_lybit_moloko]

no need tnx

[Mr.Scott]

I thought Opteron on 939 was a given. It always was before.

[yosarianilives]

Same on am2

[Guest Digg_de]

No advantage with a s939 Opteron, right?

[Mr.Scott]

1 hour ago, Digg_de said:

No advantage with a s939 Opteron, right?

Not that I've found. They are equal to their desktop counterparts.

[CL3P20]

wrestling with an FX-4100 takes... patience lol

[moi_kot_lybit_moloko]

div iv, stage 2 - disable cores and submit as fx-9370(4p) is allowed?

[cbjaust]

That might just work. Will wait for Alby to chime in.

[yosarianilives]

It has a category 

[cbjaust]

indeed

[Leeghoofd]

There's no core limitation, only memory limitation. If the CPU has a separate (core) classification on the BOT, abuse it ?

[ksateaaa23]

3DMARK PROFILE MAX few observations of the submitted score links.

1.https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/73398529-----Allzombi

custom run

not valid

frequency as per the link 4824mhz

hwinfo running, but max clock is 4770.7

as per the cpu z frequency  is 4793.96

2. https://www.3dmark.com/cpu/516362-------Bdg25

frequency as per the link is 4835 mhz

3.https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/73249605 ---- GIGAHERZ

frequency as per the link is 4831mhz

4.https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/74078963-----DustFresh

custom run

Kindly look into it.

 

 

 

 

[Leeghoofd]

moderated

[ksateaaa23]

https://hwbot.org/submission/4957600 Custom Run. Non-default settings were used. Not valid Link: https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/73398021

[Leeghoofd]

He had a better score for the compo already, deleted this one

[DustFresh]

On 4/19/2022 at 10:11 AM, ksateaaa23 said:

4.https://www.3dmark.com/3dm/74078963-----DustFresh

custom run

Btw regarding this (possible feature improvement) - can user really remove their submission from competition? I have edited the highest incorrect ones and checked "I don't want points for this..", but It stayed in compo.

Then I made correct submission (https://hwbot.org/submission/4972530_), but was unable to do better score, so the incorrect highest one stayed in the compo and correct one did not enter. Now I can not enter the compo with correct one anymore.

I do have one bench run which I did not upload yet with one point better I believe, so that should solve it, but I was wondering if this could possibly be improved somehow?