EVGA EPower Board is out

[Chiller]

you have also a GTX285 Classified, and i used it on ref gtx285 with around the same OC on LN².

 

So NOT worse

[Massman]

So, when can you actually post results and comparison Chiller?

 

A 1600MHz Radeon HD 6670 would be quite good. In fact, it would be the highest clocked HD 6000 series card ...

[Hondacity]

Fanboy lol

[Chiller]

nope, there are other 1600Mhz 6670's, also 1500Mhz from HWI contest.

 

But untouchy is not mounted anymore on that vga.

I couldn't post score in time for contest because i was outside country for work, just came up order from work.

[Massman]

Haven't seen 1600+ cards before, so that Untouchable would be a serious advantage if it boosts 200 MHz

[Chiller]

regular Vmod in that contest get clocks at 1500Mhz, so it's a 100Mhz gain.

 

Don't believe me ?

Just see the mods on Vga, it says enough what a ugly thing i made of it

[Massman]

I don't doubt you are modifying the card, just want to know how it boosted your MHz. By the million threads you've made on all the forums, I would thing this tool would boost my 580 to 2GHz core speed

 

(ps: I'm not trying to make this thing look bad or so. Just looking for some factual numbers)

[Gamer]

We are talking about 3D Chiller, not desktop mhz.

 

I used the 6670 in that competition.

Nedernakker could get 1500mhz out of it, mine only did 1440mhz.

 

I didn't do the mods btw, all credits go to Teemto.

Edited January 26, 2012 by Gamer

[K404]

For caps to benefit, the legs have to be as short as possible.

 

Not bashing, just saying

[Chiller]

For caps to benefit, the legs have to be as short as possible.

 

Not bashing, just saying

 

Indeed :

 

 

[Gamer]

Indeed Chiller, indeed.

 

Now show us some results if you please.

[nedernakker]

What i understand from chiller his card was a bad clocker, his results with the untouchy on it were bad too.

 

the 6670 I used was only modified with a Vmod for mem and GPU, it gave me 1500 MHz core and 1375 MHzmem

[Chiller]

what you understanded from me ?

 

uhu. Before i go outside the country for work was testing it on air and few hours before i left quick test on LN².

 

And i have two of those vga's 6670.

 

Think not that i said it was bad clocker.

[nedernakker]

yeah, on a dutch forum you told your results:

 

you reached 1375/1225 on stock VRM and

finished a run on 1400/1275 with the untouchable

 

based on the ln2 scores from al the other users, its a very bad clocking card, even WITH the untouchable on it.

 

or you are saying it is not the card but it is you?

 

maybe I misunderstood

[Massman]

1400? I thought it was 1600MHz with Untouchable ...

[Mafio]

looks interesting, waiting to see it available in EVGA EU shop

[Chiller]

yeah, on a dutch forum you told your results:

 

you reached 1375/1225 on stock VRM and

finished a run on 1400/1275 with the untouchable

 

based on the ln2 scores from al the other users, its a very bad clocking card, even WITH the untouchable on it.

 

or you are saying it is not the card but it is you?

 

maybe I misunderstood

 

What you don't understand that the 1400Mhz was a quick run, because i had to leave for work outside the country and was not the final run????

 

and stop trolling, this is topic about hardware news, not about discussion between you and me (oth team members cheating) and old contest that was not really ..........

 

Back ontopic and no trolling.

 

looks interesting, waiting to see it available in EVGA EU shop

 

 

 

Tin said that it would be very fast avalaible in EU shop.

Would be nice if Evga stuf would be better avalaible in europe.

there are more nice toys in evga shop, but not all in eu shop.

 

(gtx580 classy backplates, power booster, and others)

[nedernakker]

1400? I thought it was 1600MHz with Untouchable ...

 

no, the untouchable failed him big time, he didn't even submit a score in that competition.

I guess it is not the untouchable who has the blame, guess it is the modification itself

 

the highest core clock was mine, 1500 MHz @ 1.59V on the stock VRM with VR mod.

 

What you don't understand that the 1400Mhz was a quick run, because i had to leave for work outside the country and was not the final run????

 

and stop trolling, this is topic about hardware news, not about discussion between you and me (oth team members cheating) and old contest that was not really ..........

 

Back ontopic and no trolling.)

 

so now it's work, on the dutch forum it was the lack of competition.

 

this has nothing to do with trolling, it's all about the hardware, everybody is interested in the benefit the untouchables give, well, in your case it was minimal.

 

and i'm not gonna respond to your evidence-less accusations. we both know it's bullshit and you are the one trolling here saying those things ... again..

Edited January 29, 2012 by nedernakker

[knopflerbruce]

If Chiller can't provide OK comparison numbers, just buy one and test for yourselves. Damn. His numbers are better than nothing, and unless he planned to make a huge comparison review, whatever reasons for this and that are completely irrelevant to the discussion. Plus, I bet the gain will differ from stock PCB to stock PCB, so what we see with a 6670 could be very different from a 560ti for example.

[Chiller]

Subbed +1

[Massman]

If Chiller can't provide OK comparison numbers, just buy one and test for yourselves. Damn. His numbers are better than nothing, and unless he planned to make a huge comparison review, whatever reasons for this and that are completely irrelevant to the discussion. Plus, I bet the gain will differ from stock PCB to stock PCB, so what we see with a 6670 could be very different from a 560ti for example.

 

The problem is that Chiller says he has valid comparisons which clearly show that the Untouchable is giving 100-200MHz boost on several cards. But when we ask more information, we can see nothing factual that supports his comments.

 

So, although he is making bold claims, we still have nothing.

 

Even if the Untouchable would give less than 20MHz boost on average and not be able to turn an average card into a great card, this is still a pretty cool product. Thumbs up for Evga for actually putting this in production!

[Chiller]

i'm not lying about it, can't you just accept it ?

 

Is it not normal that it gives something extra ?

 

Like a stock 2Phase VRM to a UT 10 Phase VRM ? 1+1=3 maybe ?

 

You see what the results are what are posted, take it as a man.

[K404]

Extra phases doesn't automatically mean more OC.

 

The community has already been through this on motherboards.

 

 

There are situations where inproved PWM helps..... and there are situations where it doesn't.

 

 

 

Time to quote Shamino.

 

 

"Not saying, but showing"

Edited January 29, 2012 by K404

[Chiller]

Extra phases doesn't automatically mean more OC.

 

There are situations where inproved PWM helps..... and there are situations where it doesn't.

 

 

Agree

[Massman]

i'm not lying about it, can't you just accept it ?

 

Is it not normal that it gives something extra ?

 

Like a stock 2Phase VRM to a UT 10 Phase VRM ? 1+1=3 maybe ?

 

You see what the results are what are posted, take it as a man.

 

Take what as a man?

 

When I see this product, I figure: "okay, this is interesting for low-end/mainstream cards as well to repair broken ones, but it probably won't magically turn a shit card into a super one". All your posts scream: "this makes my card go super-dooper crazy fast", claiming not only a 100MHz boost on your reference GTX285, but also a record-breaking 1600MHz on your HD 6670 (+200MHz from 1.4G). All thanks to the Untouchable. All I (and others) ask for is some evidence to back up these big claims.

 

And you just don't deliver.

 

Again, I'm sure this can boost in some cases, but by how much is a very big question mark. Again, two thumbs up for Evga for releasing this thing and I'm really, really looking forward to see what other users can do with this thing. But, when it comes to objective, factual, evidence-supporting claims ... you have given none.

 

You are doing very well advertisement-wise, though