Jump to content

Featured Replies

  • Crew
On 9/29/2022 at 4:23 AM, MachineLearning said:

Thank you kindly. :)

I did make a mistake calling the Dimensity 1050 the MT6879; MT6879 is (as you added) the Dimensity 920, which is identical to the 1050 except for mmWave support & the GPU (Mali G68-MC4 vs G610-MC3 respectively). They are even on the same node (TSMC 6nm). CPU-Z identifies it as MT6879, which I suppose is dead-on per the CPU side.

So, does this matter for submissions? Should I submit MediaTek Dimensity 1050 under 920?

Makes no difference to me how you do it, I just am interested in knowing. ;)

Thanks again!

Ok I renamed the category to Dimensity 1050. Seems there is no MTxxxx number known for it.

  • Replies 1k
  • Views 114.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • This conversation started at W9 forum: https://warp9-systems.proboards.com/thread/1474/gainward-bliss-7800gs-agp Yes, there is an issue with 7800GS/7800GS+ and Gainward variants of this but I'll

  • Strunkenbold
    Strunkenbold

    Ive added Altra series lineup to the db. Sorry things took so long. Im very busy atm.

  • Antinomy
    Antinomy

    I've sent and e-mail to Franck Delattre too, maybe he'll fix this in new CPU-Z. Looks like he didn't know too

Posted Images

On 10/3/2022 at 4:44 PM, Strunkenbold said:

Ok I renamed the category to Dimensity 1050. Seems there is no MTxxxx number known for it.

Thanks :)

This is the most detailed info I can extract. Both CPU-Z & AIDA64 just say MT6879, but DevCheck lists it as MT6879V/ZA. Although as you can plainly see, it also misidentifies the chip as Dimensity 820 and gets core configuration incorrect.

Screenshot_20221003-122335.thumb.jpg.a5c534b75f4c65f90e3162f9bdaa4b6c.jpg

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...