pcmark04 does exist, but you don't any points for it anymore

PCM 04 gives no points - I know it. But the problem is that my results was deleted without any information! I dont recieve no letters about it. I repeat - I posted them 3rd july - before new request for screenshots - that's why it's very strange for me...

Malicious Cheater - Paulo Jorge ( Team: Techzonept) !!!!!!!!

 

GeForce FX5600 - 3D 2003 Mark

3542 marks - Paulo Jorge (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 391/343mhz)

3458 marks - PJ (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 390/335mhz )

3373 marks - PFJ (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 391/343mhz)

3368 marks - AGP (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 393/343mhz)

3232 marks - M_Guy (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 390/335mhz)

 

In 3D Mark 2005 situation similar.

 

The identical CPU, MB, RAM.

 

I ask to take very strict measures.

2 klopcha - good job, camrad! it's very bad to do such things...

I can share my result for P-3 533 slot-1 with all my team (to bench my hw with different settings) - and we can get more than 100 points - but it's not fair play! for what???

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=545446 need more proof,no cpu screen

Heh, heh, heh......I thing that this resault has an ERROR copmutation....Check it out please.....

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656850

 

 

.

Thanks Hipro!

 

Fixed.

Invalid Verification link: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=599771

 

Project Submission Failed: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631486

 

Project is not valid: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628686

 

Project is not valid: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628664

This person has a 9000 Series Video card not a 9200Pro

http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_933

 

3Dmark 2001 - 8764 marks - Pointhore (Bleedinedge)

3Dmark 2003 - 1586 marks - Pointhore (Bleedinedge)

Aquamark - 14763 marks - Pointhore (Bleedinedge)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=655861, wrong category, under GO7900GS (core G70) instead of 7900GS (core G71)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634702, wrong category, under P4 3GHz socket 478 instead of P4 630 3GHz

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634730, need more proof, 3DM05 Pro but resolution not visible

This person has a 9000 Series Video card not a 9200Pro

http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_933

 

3Dmark 2001 - 8764 marks - Pointhore (Bleedinedge)

3Dmark 2003 - 1586 marks - Pointhore (Bleedinedge)

Aquamark - 14763 marks - Pointhore (Bleedinedge)

 

Sorry, my Mistake. It's been fixed.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593995

wrong score

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593995

wrong score

what wrong score?

Hello everyone.

 

I have a little problem here:

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658460

 

As I was going to post my X1950XTX CF results, but I entered X1950Pro result instead.

 

And that result is with single X1950PRO, not Dual, as I wrote.

 

If it's possible to fix that, I'd be gratefull

 

:ws:

what wrong score?

 

2min 30.046s = 150.046s, not 90s

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658307 I think it's fake becouse it has better score about 20K without OC

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658307 I think it's fake becouse it has better score about 20K without OC

 

True can ot be !

2min 30.046s = 150.046s, not 90s

:woot: All fixed

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=652887 - 10397 in 3DMark05 on a single GeForce 7600GS DDR2?? Compare this result with the second place result: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615740

One of our forum members has posted two results using a x2 4000+ brisbane and used that description in his forum post, but the bot has put his two scores to the 4000+ X2 Toledo.

Could one of the mods please fix that for me/us as these two scores have picked up points by mistake.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658361

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658368

 

Thanks

Please fix:

 

Celeron-433 Slot-1 - http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1106

 

Results are for S370, was published in august-september 2007.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632589

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642646

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632590

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632593

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642872

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=633014

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642863

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=633015

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642330

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=633046

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642333

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642644

Kindly I remind

Originally Posted by klopcha View Post

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644052 ???

 

If results 2001 and 2003 it is necessary to block and Aquamark have been blocked

 

Sorry for my bad english.

 

WHEN me will hear? HEAR?

 

Malicious Cheater - Paulo Jorge ( Team: Techzonept) !!!!!!!!

 

GeForce FX5600 - 3D 2003 Mark

3542 marks - Paulo Jorge (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 391/343mhz)

3458 marks - PJ (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 390/335mhz )

3373 marks - PFJ (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 391/343mhz)

3368 marks - AGP (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 393/343mhz)

3232 marks - M_Guy (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 390/335mhz)

 

In 3D Mark 2001, 2005 situation similar.

 

The identical CPU, MB, RAM.

 

I ask to take very strict measures.

 

Where are Moderators ?

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=605107 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=600482 no resolution on the screen

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=592248 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=597773 project is not valid

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=610882 wrong resolution,should be 1280/1024

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=585480 no verification

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=569666 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=569666 no resolution

 

 

hey, dude, as you can see on the screen i'm using 3dmark06 BASIC edition, so i can't even change resolution.

 

the bench was done in 1280x1024 (default)

The whole Celeron 350 for S478 section is wrong.. all results are Celeron M 350..