Massman Posted September 21, 2007 Share Posted September 21, 2007 What's going on??? Why all my results on 7200 GS was deleted?? what is the reason?? For marks 05 & 06 results was viewed by ORB! I bought ALL MARKS and paid money for this!! If you don't like my results with 3200 cpu - no problems, I bench again - but with cpu overclocked to 3600 or 3400 - and results will be higher!!! And you will got the FM links! And I make a foto of my vga card and post it! was deleted: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642707 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642708 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642704 Your results are incredibly high for that system. Please, mail/PM me the url's of the published FM projects. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipro5 Posted September 21, 2007 Share Posted September 21, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649121 This is a 2k3 and not a PCMark2005..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Van_Rossco Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=645902 Could you please Unblock this result? Forum I posted on Needed registration to view attached images... have now added image to result directly. :-) Cheers guys! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted September 22, 2007 Crew Share Posted September 22, 2007 could anyone please unblock this result? i've rebenched the card and now everything is shown http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581582 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxi Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 Hipro - looks like he fixed it himself Van - done Turricane - done Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipro5 Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 Now......May I ask one question?........ Does this score has validation file so to compare?.....I can't find it anywhere........ http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640070 EDIT: Ahhhh..........forget it.........It seem that TOO many HIGH top 20 Aquamark3 scores don't have it........No "rules" followed any more just to be more "typical" each other.... It aint worth it....... . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 Now......May I ask one question?........ Does this score has validation file so to compare?.....I can't find it anywhere........ http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640070 . I have the verification html file, do you want it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipro5 Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 I have the verification html file, do you want it? Yes please coz I want to compare platforms..... Thanks....... P.S. whouldn't be better IF all of us have upload it so others who are interested to download it and compare their resaults with it?...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 We would have too much aquamark traffic . But you're right, the aquamark system is not really easy ... we'll figure something out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S_A_V Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=606046 27.7 CPU Score in Aquamark @ only 4280MHz CPU and SLI'ed cards - impossible for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaSell Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644505 - just take a look at others 631 scores in this benchmark. With 1.5ghz more it should be fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PowerToTheUsers Posted September 23, 2007 Share Posted September 23, 2007 The results in http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_812'>http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_812 should be in http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_807. The category of http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_812 is the same as http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1276. http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_814 needs merging with http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1278 and http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_815 needs merging with http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1279. Thx bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potapicus Posted September 23, 2007 Share Posted September 23, 2007 so, there is some problems... I test my 7200 GS on default cpu...and the result in 01 mark is higher, than the overclocked system...and in 06 mark result is the same. I post all links and orb detailed screen for 01 mark, because it can't identify my processor... and if you again will think that it's the wrong results etc.. - please DO NOT erase them. I'll give you my ORB log & pass and ypou'll inspect it in my area, ok? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted September 23, 2007 Share Posted September 23, 2007 so, there is some problems... I test my 7200 GS on default cpu...and the result in 01 mark is higher, than the overclocked system...and in 06 mark result is the same. I post all links and orb detailed screen for 01 mark, because it can't identify my processor... and if you again will think that it's the wrong results etc.. - please DO NOT erase them. I'll give you my ORB log & pass and ypou'll inspect it in my area, ok? Have a little patience, you don't have to PM me AND post on the forums the same time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lunatic@98 Posted September 23, 2007 Share Posted September 23, 2007 pleace fix this http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625724 It´s wrong CPU-model This is en T7300 edit: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631162 wrong time, right is 47,52 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621729 wrong time, rigth is 47,42 thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potapicus Posted September 23, 2007 Share Posted September 23, 2007 2 Massman - it's a little bit difference - I send you in PM links for overclocked system - but now I post links for non-overclocked system (except video)... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted September 23, 2007 Share Posted September 23, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=592267 funny verification;) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648966 need more proof,card not visible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pointhore Posted September 23, 2007 Share Posted September 23, 2007 Can you guys take a look at the X1300 256 category. http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_428 There are alot of cards with 400+ clocks on the memory. 200 is stock for memory (DDR1) and I am pretty sure DDR1 won't clock that high. Here are a few that need more proof. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648765 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=565788 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622510 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571376 Can't see resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635879 No Link or image http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569909 these two are definately questionable http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569910 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inertiacreep Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 Posted in the Pentium 4 Mobile 1.7Ghz (Northwood-512 L2) category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639205 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562843 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639206 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639203 made with Pentium 4 Williamette 1.7ghz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
o polonos Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 Posted in the Pentium 4 Mobile 1.7Ghz (Northwood-512 L2) categoryhttp://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639205 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562843 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639206 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639203 made with Pentium 4 Williamette 1.7ghz Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drager Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 So... wrong result by THRASHER (ONLY CPU-Z) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631943 socket 478 but 775 category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631951 same http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=633696 should be qx6800, not x6800. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641320 no validation http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=514870 no vertification (but here http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=520043 and http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556416 thrasher has his screenshot imho) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562035 wrong cpu on validation page http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580669 socket 478 in 423 category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604033 no validation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 still not fixed: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=592267 wrong verification http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648966 need more proof,card not visible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
o polonos Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 So... wrong result by THRASHER (ONLY CPU-Z)http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631943 socket 478 but 775 category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631951 same http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=633696 should be qx6800, not x6800. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641320 no validation http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=514870 no vertification (but here http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=520043 and http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556416 thrasher has his screenshot imho) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562035 wrong cpu on validation page http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580669 socket 478 in 423 category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604033 no validation still not fixed:http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=592267 wrong verification http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648966 need more proof,card not visible Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipro5 Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649930 missing about 40000 3Dmarks....PLUS it's a 2k5 verification link and not a 2k3....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaSell Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644505 - just take a look at others 631 scores in this benchmark. With 1.5ghz more it should be fine. Still there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts