Crew Turrican Posted October 17, 2007 Crew Share Posted October 17, 2007 pcmark04 does exist, but you don't any points for it anymore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potapicus Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 PCM 04 gives no points - I know it. But the problem is that my results was deleted without any information! I dont recieve no letters about it. I repeat - I posted them 3rd july - before new request for screenshots - that's why it's very strange for me... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted October 17, 2007 Share Posted October 17, 2007 Malicious Cheater - Paulo Jorge ( Team: Techzonept) !!!!!!!! GeForce FX5600 - 3D 2003 Mark 3542 marks - Paulo Jorge (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 391/343mhz) 3458 marks - PJ (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 390/335mhz ) 3373 marks - PFJ (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 391/343mhz) 3368 marks - AGP (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 393/343mhz) 3232 marks - M_Guy (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 390/335mhz) In 3D Mark 2005 situation similar. The identical CPU, MB, RAM. I ask to take very strict measures. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potapicus Posted October 18, 2007 Share Posted October 18, 2007 2 klopcha - good job, camrad! it's very bad to do such things... I can share my result for P-3 533 slot-1 with all my team (to bench my hw with different settings) - and we can get more than 100 points - but it's not fair play! for what??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted October 18, 2007 Share Posted October 18, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=545446 need more proof,no cpu screen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipro5 Posted October 18, 2007 Share Posted October 18, 2007 Heh, heh, heh......I thing that this resault has an ERROR copmutation....Check it out please..... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656850 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SF3D Posted October 18, 2007 Share Posted October 18, 2007 Thanks Hipro! Fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Learnin' Posted October 21, 2007 Share Posted October 21, 2007 Invalid Verification link: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=599771 Project Submission Failed: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631486 Project is not valid: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628686 Project is not valid: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628664 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THRASHER2 Posted October 21, 2007 Author Share Posted October 21, 2007 This person has a 9000 Series Video card not a 9200Pro http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_933 3Dmark 2001 - 8764 marks - Pointhore (Bleedinedge) 3Dmark 2003 - 1586 marks - Pointhore (Bleedinedge) Aquamark - 14763 marks - Pointhore (Bleedinedge) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kal_garath Posted October 21, 2007 Share Posted October 21, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=655861, wrong category, under GO7900GS (core G70) instead of 7900GS (core G71) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634702, wrong category, under P4 3GHz socket 478 instead of P4 630 3GHz http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634730, need more proof, 3DM05 Pro but resolution not visible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pointhore Posted October 21, 2007 Share Posted October 21, 2007 This person has a 9000 Series Video card not a 9200Pro http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_933 3Dmark 2001 - 8764 marks - Pointhore (Bleedinedge) 3Dmark 2003 - 1586 marks - Pointhore (Bleedinedge) Aquamark - 14763 marks - Pointhore (Bleedinedge) Sorry, my Mistake. It's been fixed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narmer (inactive) Posted October 21, 2007 Share Posted October 21, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593995 wrong score Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THRASHER2 Posted October 22, 2007 Author Share Posted October 22, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593995wrong score what wrong score? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Razer Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 Hello everyone. I have a little problem here: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658460 As I was going to post my X1950XTX CF results, but I entered X1950Pro result instead. And that result is with single X1950PRO, not Dual, as I wrote. If it's possible to fix that, I'd be gratefull :ws: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narmer (inactive) Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 what wrong score? 2min 30.046s = 150.046s, not 90s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepek86 Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658307 I think it's fake becouse it has better score about 20K without OC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted October 22, 2007 Share Posted October 22, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658307 I think it's fake becouse it has better score about 20K without OC True can ot be ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THRASHER2 Posted October 22, 2007 Author Share Posted October 22, 2007 2min 30.046s = 150.046s, not 90s :woot: All fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kolian Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=652887 - 10397 in 3DMark05 on a single GeForce 7600GS DDR2?? Compare this result with the second place result: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615740 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Deanzo Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 One of our forum members has posted two results using a x2 4000+ brisbane and used that description in his forum post, but the bot has put his two scores to the 4000+ X2 Toledo. Could one of the mods please fix that for me/us as these two scores have picked up points by mistake. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658361 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=658368 Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potapicus Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 Please fix: Celeron-433 Slot-1 - http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1106 Results are for S370, was published in august-september 2007. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632589 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642646 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632590 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632593 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642872 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=633014 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642863 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=633015 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642330 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=633046 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642333 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642644 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted October 23, 2007 Share Posted October 23, 2007 Kindly I remind Originally Posted by klopcha View Post http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644052 ??? If results 2001 and 2003 it is necessary to block and Aquamark have been blocked Sorry for my bad english. WHEN me will hear? HEAR? Malicious Cheater - Paulo Jorge ( Team: Techzonept) !!!!!!!! GeForce FX5600 - 3D 2003 Mark 3542 marks - Paulo Jorge (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 391/343mhz) 3458 marks - PJ (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 390/335mhz ) 3373 marks - PFJ (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 391/343mhz) 3368 marks - AGP (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 393/343mhz) 3232 marks - M_Guy (Techzonept) - (GeForce FX 5600 @ 390/335mhz) In 3D Mark 2001, 2005 situation similar. The identical CPU, MB, RAM. I ask to take very strict measures. Where are Moderators ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted October 24, 2007 Share Posted October 24, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=605107 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=600482 no resolution on the screen http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=592248 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=597773 project is not valid http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=610882 wrong resolution,should be 1280/1024 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=585480 no verification http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=569666 no resolution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted October 24, 2007 Crew Share Posted October 24, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=569666 no resolution hey, dude, as you can see on the screen i'm using 3dmark06 BASIC edition, so i can't even change resolution. the bench was done in 1280x1024 (default) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginner Posted October 24, 2007 Share Posted October 24, 2007 The whole Celeron 350 for S478 section is wrong.. all results are Celeron M 350.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts