MaSell Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 @MaSell - too old to block So what? I must have 5ghz c2d and card cooled by ln2, to beat guy with k8 2,7ghz and ~100mhz less vga frequency than me? My c2d 4.7ghz is not enough... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepek86 Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=620134 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632253 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629998 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588516 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632768 Screens don't show resolution in which are tested. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629314 here don't any screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617445 here don't any screen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drager Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562847 no validation. On foto I don`t see CPU name Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
o polonos Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562847 no validation. On foto I don`t see CPU name Cpu name look's fine too me Link So what? I must have 5ghz c2d and card cooled by ln2, to beat guy with k8 2,7ghz and ~100mhz less vga frequency than me? My c2d 4.7ghz is not enough... Please note: scores older than 1 year are not blocked for missing verification. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=620134http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632253 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629998 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588516 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632768 Screens don't show resolution in which are tested. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629314 here don't any screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617445 here don't any screen Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepek86 Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617421 verification link is wrong http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629318 here don't any screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632831 screen doesn't show resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=620124 screen doesn't show resolution Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 harley - first 2 fixed, 3rd is OK. @MaSell - too old to block @bwannasoft - you can make more accounts with FM Hipro the first two we're scanned @ forum, the last was online submit. He just made a mistake with the hwbot tag ha ha ha i don´t fake anything about other FM it´s Okay i bench all again - n o problem. but @ o polonos before you blocked any benches about me with the Problem "Calculate Done" watch this http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1134 but my benches BLOCKED i thinking about delete all my entries and say goodbye well it´s stupid to block right benches - and allow this:eek: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 Bwanasoft, I said to you via mail that we don't focus our moderation powers on your account solely, but for 85% on the reported scores. Asyour results were reported, we had no other option than to block them, if they're legit (what definitly the case) or not. We've set some ground rules which we have to respect to be able to keep the 90k+ database as clean as possible. We try to be as friendly and objective for all our users, but sometimes our actions upset users. If you delete your results, I can understand the reasoning without any problem and I will still respect you, but I won't like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 iss no problem but when i say need more proof or wrong cpu needs - weeks to fix it look here XP 1800 my XP 1800 goes max 43.547 sec at 2305 mhz with G.skill RAM 2-2-2-5 but this ???? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=578386 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604771 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=553567 what this BananaCPU´s normaly when i go on the bell for Report result musst be blocked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
o polonos Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=578386 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604771 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=553567 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617421 verification link is wronghttp://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629318 here don't any screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632831 screen doesn't show resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=620124 screen doesn't show resolution Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 thx more work http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1134 watch all entries - all wrong - wrong CPU - missing verification next time you can have right entry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipro5 Posted September 26, 2007 Share Posted September 26, 2007 Here's a score which is 3rd (within the first 20) BUT it has NO varification link.....Could someone PM him so to upload it?...Thanks... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650447 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaSell Posted September 26, 2007 Share Posted September 26, 2007 Please note: scores older than 1 year are not blocked for missing verification. Verification isn't probem in Aquamark. Problem is that score is 100% fake, result is 30-40% too high. So if somebody year ago add spi 1m 1.000s score without valid, now it will be ok? It's joke... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxi Posted September 26, 2007 Share Posted September 26, 2007 The fact is MaSell, if a score stands for 1 year and no one reports it it is strange when someone all the sudden takes notice. In this case we are willing to review it more closely for you....even though you are not asking the right way Please privide your HTML result file and we will look at this further. Thanks, maxi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaSell Posted September 26, 2007 Share Posted September 26, 2007 Unfortunatly I can do that, because I havent got ln2 and all hardware (2x1gb ocz reaper etc) when only I want. You can compare 3rd and 4th score in this category (http://hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_282). Cpu similar to T_M, vga frequency also, and scores 10k lower. I have near 2x faster cpu, much faster vga and he is still faster. For sure fake or some bug. Compare his 3dm01 score to my: http://hwbot.org/user.do?userId=6051 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9262143 "Little" faster, over 100% Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THRASHER2 Posted September 26, 2007 Author Share Posted September 26, 2007 Ok.....WHAT THE HELL! I Smell Cheating Same Team, Same Score, Same attachment and Same Background????? someone has some explaining...... 3Dmark 2005 - 302 marks - lunatic@98 (Crazy-OC Germany) http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=28209&thumb=false 3Dmark 2005 - 302 marks - Bwanasoft (Crazy-OC Germany) http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=43802&thumb=false http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_1190 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxi Posted September 27, 2007 Share Posted September 27, 2007 I agree MaSell it looks funny...then I noticed this from his forum post. "Heh, ran on the brink of crashing, i couldnt even see lots of the tests, but it passed. Havent had time to rerun to see if score was affected either way." I am going to chalk this up to a bugged result, the result is blocked. Thanks for playing, maxi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaSell Posted September 27, 2007 Share Posted September 27, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644505 - just take a look at others 631 scores in this benchmark. With 1.5ghz more it should be fine. stilll there Thank Maxi :celebration: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573096 wrong category http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=592663 wrong category http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637074 wrong category Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted September 27, 2007 Share Posted September 27, 2007 Ok.....WHAT THE HELL! I Smell Cheating Same Team, Same Score, Same attachment and Same Background????? someone has some explaining...... 3Dmark 2005 - 302 marks - lunatic@98 (Crazy-OC Germany) http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=28209&thumb=false 3Dmark 2005 - 302 marks - Bwanasoft (Crazy-OC Germany) http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=43802&thumb=false http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_1190 this was lunatic not me i fix it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEVILEK Posted September 27, 2007 Share Posted September 27, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650382 THRASHER2 - not possible to get this score on single card. It's SLI 100%. Moderation or Thrasher please edit this score to SLI. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THRASHER2 Posted September 27, 2007 Author Share Posted September 27, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650382 THRASHER2 - not possible to get this score on single card. It's SLI 100%. Moderation or Thrasher please edit this score to SLI. I fixed that one Sorry about that :woot: I posted that late at night I must have missed the SLi thing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THRASHER2 Posted September 27, 2007 Author Share Posted September 27, 2007 this was lunatic not me i fix itSo were both of you guys sharing the Core 2 X6800 (2.93Ghz) CPU? Or all the scores with the Core 2 X6800 (2.93Ghz) lunatic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEVILEK Posted September 27, 2007 Share Posted September 27, 2007 I fixed that one Sorry about that :woot: I posted that late at night I must have missed the SLi thing. No problem Thanks for fix this. And another SLI score submit to single GPU category ... http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580732 Regards Martin Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted September 27, 2007 Share Posted September 27, 2007 So were both of you guys sharing the Core 2 X6800 (2.93Ghz) CPU? Or all the scores with the Core 2 X6800 (2.93Ghz) lunatic? no we have the same ASROCK & X6800 and Graka - but sell it now to MATTI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted September 27, 2007 Share Posted September 27, 2007 ATI 9000 PRO into 9000 section http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=551129 26 Sep 2007 02:28 modified demiurg manually modified by team captain (demiurg) - reason: no reason given Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
o polonos Posted September 27, 2007 Share Posted September 27, 2007 ATI 9000 PRO into 9000 sectionhttp://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=551129 Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts