Wrong Result

[Bwanasoft]

:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D

 

It´s fun only fun but fun must be real.

[Genius_pt]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628544 - the score he claims (44s) does not correspond to the screenshot that tells 44,54s.

[Bwanasoft]

LOOOOOOOL

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=606318

 

Wrong CPU - XP 1500 have Multi 10 - CPU Screen ? and the Best

 

It´s with a DigiCam

[Massman]

All needed screens are there. Weren't palomino unlockable?

 

Edit: as it's my teammate, I'll ask him right now

Edit2: it's a 2000+ palomino, Everest had troubles reading the cpu specifications . I'll fix his scores

[MaSell]

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562221

 

nedds more proof, link to orb don't work

[kal_garath]

nobody wants to correct these scores

 

Could you please fix these results :

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634844 - Screen show 516,136sec (8min36.136sec) but written result is : 5min16sec

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632415 - Screen show 475.178sec (7min55,178sec) but written result is : 5min15sec and no CPU identification on the screen

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632145 - Screen show 241.638sec (4min1.638sec) but written result is : 2min41sec

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634877 - Screen show P4 630 s.775, but result in category Prescott 3GHz s.478

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=630012 - Screen show 11.921sec, but written result is : 11sec

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=633012 - Screen show 13029.311sec (3h37min9.310sec) but written result is : 1h30min29sec and no CPU identification

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632417 - Screen show 7899.11sec (2h11min39.110sec) but written result is : 1h19min39sec

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634703 - Screen show 2573.687sec (42min53.686sec), written result : 26min13sec and the result is under Prescott 3GHz s.478 instead of P4 630 s.775

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631114 - Screen show 1842.172sec (30min42.172sec) but written result is : 18min42sec

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634873 - Screen show P4 630 s.775, but result in category Prescott 3GHz s.478

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632691 - Screen show 3min27.689sec (207.689sec) but written result is : 147.69sec

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634871 - Screen show P4 630 s.775, but result in category Prescott 3GHz s.478

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634842 - Screen show 616.79sec, but written result is 376sec

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632124 - Screen show 453.36sec, but written result is 293sec

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632086 - Screen show 244.98sec, but written result is 164sec

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632985 - Screen show 229.45sec, but written result is 149sec

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634854 - No CPU identification on the screen

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641918 - No CPU identification on the screen

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=638218 - No CPU identification on the screen

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641572 - No CPU identification on the screen

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635731 - Is SetFSB enough to validate the CPU ?

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634879 - Screen show P4 630 s.775, but result in category Prescott 3GHz s.478

 

Thx in advance

[Bwanasoft]

All needed screens are there. Weren't palomino unlockable?

 

Edit: as it's my teammate, I'll ask him right now

Edit2: it's a 2000+ palomino, Everest had troubles reading the cpu specifications . I'll fix his scores

 

 

he he he

 

palomino are unlockable

with L1 bridge but when i make it i write it in

[Drager]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=645687 Asus P5B P965 + Radeon 9800 Pro? Screenshot doesn`t show videocard

[Maxi]

nobody wants to correct these scores

 

Does this person have any scores that don't need to be edited?

 

Anyway we have our eyes on this guy as I'm sure you do, thanks for reporting.

[71proste]

nobody wants to correct these scores

 

wow,good man:eek:

[klopcha]

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644053 needs more proof

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644054 needs more proof

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644052 Similary needs more proof

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=608945 needs more proof

[Massman]

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644053 needs more proof

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644054 needs more proof

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644052 Similary needs more proof

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=608945 needs more proof

 

Fixed

[Pepek86]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634625 screen show 30,687 but he write 30s

[klopcha]

Fixed

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644052 ???

[Bwanasoft]

Can you Fix in Athlon MP 2000+

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591836 - XP CPU

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631952 - XP CPU

[S_A_V]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=633182

Wrong category (Core 2 E6600 in Core 2 E2140)

[kal_garath]

New WR with SuperPI : 0,17sec (done with super PI 16k....)

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=646531

[fr@me]

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642585

It is Crossfire, not single card!!!!

[fr@me]

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627216

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=600588

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644306

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644207

 

All of this results are in wrong version of HEXUS pifast.

It is anover, very fast version!

See total physical memory allocated = 61757

Must be 61372

[o polonos]

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562221 Still there

[o polonos]

This score http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634247

And this http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634716

Is the same desktop

Or mayby im wrong ?

Take a look on icons

[kim55]

Today has looked for results with mistakes here that has left from this

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=636721 needs more proof (On a screenshot there is no information that a card really x1300pro)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=637171 cheat, explain below (The second result 9612Marks, and at it 32480Marks it is too much for such card)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=636590 matched to wrong videocard or processor (On screen is not seen model of videocard)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=631913 matched to wrong videocard or processor (On a screenshot adjustment of the test and also the information about X600 are not visible)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=624214 matched to wrong videocard or processor (It tested the mobile version on DS3 and E6600, it is not real. It is simple X600)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=624195 matched to wrong videocard or processor (It tested the mobile version on DS3 and E6600, it is not real. It is simple X600)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=624230 matched to wrong videocard or processor (It tested the mobile version on DS3 and E6600, it is not real. It is simple X600)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=631594 matched to wrong videocard or processor (pen4-530 did not put on notebook therefore it not the mobile version and simple X600. written MOBAIL X600. Has closed a window and has left only X600)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=547992 needs more proof (Link on orb is not worket)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=645249 matched to wrong videocard or processor (On a screenshot not where it is not visible model of video of a card)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=632194 matched to wrong videocard or processor (On a screenshot not where it is not visible model of video of a card)

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=633100 needs more proof (On a screenshot it is not visible adjustments of the test, and break at it enough big from competitors at much low frequencies)

 

 

Excuse me for my English

[o polonos]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644369 is in wrong cathegory

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634686 is in wrong cathegory

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615403 is in wrong cathegory

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636880 is in wrong cathegory

[Massman]

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642585

It is Crossfire, not single card!!!!

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627216

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=600588

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644306

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644207

 

All of this results are in wrong version of HEXUS pifast.

It is anover, very fast version!

See total physical memory allocated = 61757

Must be 61372

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562221 Still there

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644369 is in wrong cathegory

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634686 is in wrong cathegory

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615403 is in wrong cathegory

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636880 is in wrong cathegory

 

Fixed

[Massman]

Today has looked for results with mistakes here that has left from this

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=636721 needs more proof (On a screenshot there is no information that a card really x1300pro)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=637171 cheat, explain below (The second result 9612Marks, and at it 32480Marks it is too much for such card)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=636590 matched to wrong videocard or processor (On screen is not seen model of videocard)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=631913 matched to wrong videocard or processor (On a screenshot adjustment of the test and also the information about X600 are not visible)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=624214 matched to wrong videocard or processor (It tested the mobile version on DS3 and E6600, it is not real. It is simple X600)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=624195 matched to wrong videocard or processor (It tested the mobile version on DS3 and E6600, it is not real. It is simple X600)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=624230 matched to wrong videocard or processor (It tested the mobile version on DS3 and E6600, it is not real. It is simple X600)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=631594 matched to wrong videocard or processor (pen4-530 did not put on notebook therefore it not the mobile version and simple X600. written MOBAIL X600. Has closed a window and has left only X600)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=547992 needs more proof (Link on orb is not worket)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=645249 matched to wrong videocard or processor (On a screenshot not where it is not visible model of video of a card)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=632194 matched to wrong videocard or processor (On a screenshot not where it is not visible model of video of a card)

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=633100 needs more proof (On a screenshot it is not visible adjustments of the test, and break at it enough big from competitors at much low frequencies)

 

 

Excuse me for my English

 

Fixed most of the results. For the X600, we need a new category.