richba5tard Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 He got his points now. A glitch in the automatic scheduling of hwboints calculation? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643644 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipro5 Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 Someone propably have report it as bad and it was blocked?.... coz it was under moderation"..... Have they seen what a Conroe can do with such high fsb and at 1:1....?..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 Not blocked, the bot just needed a rescan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625871 video card not visible http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571016 no verification screen,or link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627239 video card not visible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipro5 Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 Ahhhh......Thanks guys...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted September 6, 2007 Crew Share Posted September 6, 2007 wrong categorie http://www.hwbot.org//result.do?resultId=641905 it's a E2180 not a a64 3400+ clawhammer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571016 no verification screen,or link I fixxed it my self. I uploaded the verification picture. edit The verification image was at a previous forum i used for hwbot The post was modified so the url was lost. http://www.thelab.gr/showthread.php?postid=414556#post414556 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588457Prescott 2.8A in 2.8E category This entry above has not been fixed. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=642959 Bench run @ 640x480 16bit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bartleby Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 hi, http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562603. it's not the good CPU because on the datasheet of Athlon XP 1600+ the L2 cache is 256ko and not 64ko as Duron or Athlon T-bird look on the vaidation: http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc.php?id=115996 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted September 6, 2007 Share Posted September 6, 2007 So many errors on Spi1M in "Pentium 4 3.0Ghz Northwood" category... All reported. Thanks. Under Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Learnin' Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643495 , http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641679 Links and descriptions are for Presler, results are in 3.4C Northwood category. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643495 ' date=' http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641679 Links and descriptions are for Presler, results are in 3.4C Northwood category.[/quote'] Fixed by me. I edited the entries and put the correct cpu. *The submitted results (in the forum) are correct. The bot seems to do the missmatch ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lanc Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639008 - need more proof, he probably run 3dmark in very low resolution - becouse second man in this category have C2D @ 4Ghz and high clocked card and have only 11k. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narmer Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591236 score from pcmark, not from 3dmark05 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 can you fix the first three places ? One iss AMD 64 - Mobile CPU - the third i can not find any Picture or Verification http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1131 thx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 Up... ? So many errors on Spi1M in "Pentium 4 3.0Ghz Northwood" category...All reported. Thanks. Under Wrong cpu : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628637 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506055 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=546593 Need more proof : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506893 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted September 7, 2007 Share Posted September 7, 2007 here the thame the first two are XP CPU´s http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1130 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted September 8, 2007 Share Posted September 8, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=554804 The projects id is not valid - it is possible that this project has not been published http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=547634 The projects id is not valid - it is possible that this project has not been published http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=605603 The projects id is not valid - it is possible that this project has not been published http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=640993 is it 7800GTX or 7800GTX 512mb???hmm... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harleybro Posted September 10, 2007 Share Posted September 10, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=626714 the screen shows 9.593 not 9 seconds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yozuri Posted September 10, 2007 Share Posted September 10, 2007 thank you for fixing moonmans wPrime 32m from 19 sec to 19sec 700ms as his screenshot shows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted September 11, 2007 Share Posted September 11, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=645496 hard to belive,can anyone tell me is it true result?e6300@3.6Ghz score 16k? ok i see now...Transparent Windows 7347.29 Windows/s hmm..wow... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THRASHER2 Posted September 12, 2007 Author Share Posted September 12, 2007 here the thame the first two are XP CPU´s http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1130 lol> That's a Sempron score Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxi Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 All fixed on this page; please note we do not typically block scores over 1 year old for missing verification. maxi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 lol> That's a Sempron score oh yes somebody link stupid benchresults here more Athlon XP Sempron 2600+ MP CPU in this categorie http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639739 Sempron is right but Sockel 754 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=598614 when i watch all us compare´s trasher2 we found lot of fake´s or wrong result, but i think we need extra a person who watch our Results :ws: please fix this in Athlon XP Sempron 2600+ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 but i think we need extra a person who watch our Results :ws: you'r right man:ws: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts