Just Learnin' Posted August 22, 2007 Share Posted August 22, 2007 Is this screenshot http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/188/pentium4c34ghz4690mhzws6.jpg acceptable for a valid CPU-z score? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559972 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S_A_V Posted August 22, 2007 Share Posted August 22, 2007 Why one user can be on the first and second places in the same time? 8600GTS - 3DMark2001 - multiple cards: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601817 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=599919 Another bugged or cheated scores (7600GT): http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634012 - just impossible with AMD CPU http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634134 - too high SM2.0/HDR for single card, too low for SLI http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=633605 - 17k CPU score on E6750@4400MHz? 26k GPU score on single 7600GT? Complete bullshit. Any С2D/4Mb CPU with only ~4100MHz can do more than 20k easy in AM3 CPU score (I can do more than 23k). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted August 22, 2007 Share Posted August 22, 2007 I'll check this tomorrow afternoon Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kal_garath Posted August 22, 2007 Share Posted August 22, 2007 Is the function "Report Entry" in service ? Because I posted a lot of reports about cheating or others errors, but nothing occurs, the results are still the same Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demos_sav Posted August 22, 2007 Share Posted August 22, 2007 Please someone fix the whole Pentium 4 socket 478 A Northwood 2.4GHz processor. Most of the results are B Northwoods not A Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DEVILEK Posted August 24, 2007 Share Posted August 24, 2007 Hi Fix this please : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636520 X6800 not Pentium Dual Core http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617261 Description: 320*200 - lol http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=614742 Description: 320*240 - hmm http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=611599 This hardware and this score ? No way. Advenced version of 06 and no orb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=611622 Hehe 32XX points on old P4 compare to 31XX point with Conroe @ 4GHz Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted August 24, 2007 Share Posted August 24, 2007 Hi Fix this please : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636520 X6800 not Pentium Dual Core http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617261 Description: 320*200 - lol http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=614742 Description: 320*240 - hmm http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=611599 This hardware and this score ? No way. Advenced version of 06 and no orb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=611622 Hehe 32XX points on old P4 compare to 31XX point with Conroe @ 4GHz Thanks Why one user can be on the first and second places in the same time? 8600GTS - 3DMark2001 - multiple cards: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601817 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=599919 Another bugged or cheated scores (7600GT): http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634012 - just impossible with AMD CPU http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634134 - too high SM2.0/HDR for single card, too low for SLI http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=633605 - 17k CPU score on E6750@4400MHz? 26k GPU score on single 7600GT? Complete bullshit. Any С2D/4Mb CPU with only ~4100MHz can do more than 20k easy in AM3 CPU score (I can do more than 23k). pentium 1 200 @ 788mhz http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637495 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637441 Please check all scores by P.A.S.S.A.T (Crazy-OC Germany) in 6800XT (NV42) cathegory:http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636982 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636984 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636985 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636987 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=636988 Looks like it 6800GT card flashed to 6800XT, because these scores are impossible for 8/4-pipelines videocard, but normal for 16/6 videocard. Clocks on P.A.S.S.A.T's screens only 425-450 for GPU and 1000-1200 for mem. My 6800XT/NV42 scores with 600/1400 clocks are much lover... No one of NV42-based cards can be unlocked and it always has 8/4 pipelines. There is only two ways to get 16/6 6800XT: GPU resoldering (removing NV42 and solder NV40) or simply BIOS-flash cheating. You missed this post: http://hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=10770&postcount=340 last one in page 34. Don't forget to see when you'll have time for it. Fixed Is this screenshot http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/188/pentium4c34ghz4690mhzws6.jpg acceptable for a valid CPU-z score? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559972 Look at the date, this score has been up since a long time and hasn't been reported by anyone except you. This is legit by date Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted August 24, 2007 Share Posted August 24, 2007 Please someone fix the whole Pentium 4 socket 478 A Northwood 2.4GHz processor. Most of the results are B Northwoods not A Working on it Should be okay now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Learnin' Posted August 24, 2007 Share Posted August 24, 2007 Look at the date, this score has been up since a long time and hasn't been reported by anyone except you. This is legit by date 9 months ago CPU-Z never existed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted August 24, 2007 Share Posted August 24, 2007 the score is way older than 9 months Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Learnin' Posted August 24, 2007 Share Posted August 24, 2007 the score is way older than 9 months I'm sorry I don't see where you get the score date? I was going by the 14/11/2006 scan date in the entry: Application CPU-Z Score 4690.00 mhz User cpulloverclock - registered hwbot.org user. Team OverClocking-Masters Processor Pentium 4 3.4Ghz Northwood @ 4690.00 mhz Videocard unknown videocard Description Pentium 4 C 3.4GHz | Asus P4C800 Dlx | Vapochill PE modded by PGEO Date scanned by bot on 14/11/2006 17:36 Just trying to understand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kal_garath Posted August 24, 2007 Share Posted August 24, 2007 Could you please have a look at this PIFast result, 46sec with P4 550 @ 3400 where other P4 550 @ > 4,1GHz are doing more than 52sec, really strange PIFast v. 4.3 perhaps ? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635051 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BioShark Posted August 25, 2007 Share Posted August 25, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=638960 SuperPI 1M - 2.99 sec. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nordling Posted August 28, 2007 Share Posted August 28, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637428 - lol! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Trouffman Posted August 28, 2007 Crew Share Posted August 28, 2007 Who's the moderator that edit this score ? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=638221 --> This System is with a SINGLE Card ! Please stop edit this score ^^ Thanks guys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted August 28, 2007 Share Posted August 28, 2007 Who's the moderator that edit this score ?http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=638221 --> This System is with a SINGLE Card ! Please stop edit this score ^^ Thanks guys Than this scores is wrong, 1K lead over the second with an AMD X2 ?? No way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Trouffman Posted August 28, 2007 Crew Share Posted August 28, 2007 No that's not cheat I was very impressed with that so high score when Black send to me the screenshots... After his first score was removed, he make it again with a 20~ difference between both. This is the systems : http://www.hiboox.com/lang-fr/resultat.php?img=0l8rf2ni.jpg It's look crappy I know... I know also his score is very high but this appear to becom from a Cgraphic card "issues" I don't really know how are the memory timing on this GC... I don't know how high are the shader... So all his actual score for that 8600GT Fatal1ty XFX are in SINGLE !! no SLI... Have you seen SLI system on the screenshot ? Massman, I know how it's difficult to moderate all that scores and I really want to help you to understand this score ^^ Now he'll try again to get his system running and validate it on ORB Bye (I won't have internet connection until tonight.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted August 28, 2007 Share Posted August 28, 2007 Probably the post-processing problem. I will look at the score again if he has it uploaded to the orb. I can also make mistakes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harleybro Posted August 28, 2007 Share Posted August 28, 2007 No that's not cheat I was very impressed with that so high score when Black send to me the screenshots... After his first score was removed, he make it again with a 20~ difference between both. This is the systems : http://www.hiboox.com/lang-fr/resultat.php?img=0l8rf2ni.jpg It's look crappy I know... I know also his score is very high but this appear to becom from a Cgraphic card "issues" I don't really know how are the memory timing on this GC... I don't know how high are the shader... So all his actual score for that 8600GT Fatal1ty XFX are in SINGLE !! no SLI... Have you seen SLI system on the screenshot ? Massman, I know how it's difficult to moderate all that scores and I really want to help you to understand this score ^^ Now he'll try again to get his system running and validate it on ORB Bye (I won't have internet connection until tonight.) You might want to check another score also. Both similar CPU clocks: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=615741 GPU clocks extremely low for nearly the same score http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=628924 Wrong res. on this one: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=639295 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darkasantion Posted August 28, 2007 Share Posted August 28, 2007 Quite some wrong ones here: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622413 States in both the post as verification link that it's an Presscot P4 'E', not Northwood 'C' http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=596327 Screenshot shows Presscot core http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=623412 Both description as forumpost shows Presscot http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=595598 Screenshot shows Presscot http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=503270 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=503265 Both points scores from the same user, ain't that not allowed? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601708 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=576556 Invalid checksum That's it for now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M A H R A D Posted August 29, 2007 Share Posted August 29, 2007 Hi everybody My CPU Code name is Windsor but wPrime Cannot identify it. Plz check it. Cheers, M A H R A D ShahrSakhtafzar IRAN team Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harleybro Posted August 31, 2007 Share Posted August 31, 2007 I hate to even post this but I am sure he has the right link. I was playing with the 06 calc and checking scores. The verification link here is for 18,4xx not 19k. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=588607 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
basco Posted September 1, 2007 Share Posted September 1, 2007 sorry for stealing points that dont belong to me! this should be an sli score! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641645 thank you mods for removing greets Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xacti Posted September 1, 2007 Share Posted September 1, 2007 It is fake. Too high score. He didnt show resolution. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=611610 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639390 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609915 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Narmer Posted September 1, 2007 Share Posted September 1, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591236 score from pcmark, not from 3dmark05 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts