harleybro Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 3dmark 2001 HOF same user in 18th and 19th place. Checking user profile also shows points for 2 identical Super Pi 1m runs for differant teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 @ Bwanasoft: The results you gave me are in the correct category. All the links you gave me are intel s478 cpu's. @ harleybro: We know, it's a little bug. RB will fix it as soon as possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipro5 Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 Isn't this WR deserves at least 0.5 hwbot points?..... It's not about the points as for me.... It's about it took me 3+months of time and over 300+ litters of LN2 when I was competing with k|ngp|n and now it worths nothing.....Not even a penny..... http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=618243 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 no it´s wrong http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1313 http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_313 all in wrong categorie my results in Socket 423 and i compare 478 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 Isn't this WR deserves at least 0.5 hwbot points?..... It's not about the points as for me.... It's about it took me 3+months of time and over 300+ litters of LN2 when I was competing with k|ngp|n and now it worths nothing.....Not even a penny..... http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=618243 . I'm afraid it will not give you points. Undoubtedly it's one of best and legendary benchmark runs ever, but with a conroe, the score are already blown away . I'm sorry, but this score won't give you more points . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 no it´s wrong http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1313 http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_313 all in wrong categorie my results in Socket 423 and i compare 478 I don't really see why your cpu's are s423? Cpu-z clearly says s478. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 bad verification link. ramdisc?!?: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571506 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604653 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594083 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594074 3Dmark 2006 - 7866 marks - Quentin (HardwareXL Benc...) - (GeForce 7800 GT @ 400/500mhz ) 14.6 3Dmark 2006 - 7718 marks - Quentin (HardwareXL Benc...) - (GeForce 7800 GT @ 400/500mhz) 3Dmark 2006 - 7331 marks - Quentin (HardwareXL Benc...) - (GeForce 7800 GT @ 400/500mhz) http://www.hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=12&teamId=0&userName=&gpu=GeForce+7800+GT+%281114%29&cpu=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=356&cpuId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints= Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harleybro Posted July 1, 2007 Share Posted July 1, 2007 Over 16k in 06 at default X6800 and single 8800GTX at default? Also can't find anything else by user and if team is checked doesn't show user on the team. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=619192 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted July 2, 2007 Share Posted July 2, 2007 Quentin LOL.... 3Dmark 2006 - 12713 marks - Quentin (HardwareXL Benc...) - (Radeon X1900 XT 512... @ 625/725mhz ) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=619194 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gradus Posted July 2, 2007 Share Posted July 2, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=616876 190хтх Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted July 2, 2007 Share Posted July 2, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617877 Result on E6600, but category Q6600. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617585 Similarly http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617764 Similarly http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=614350 and http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617006 - two Identical result http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=592929 Result on S939, but category S754. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=619242 Result on S939, but category S754. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617196 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pointhore Posted July 4, 2007 Share Posted July 4, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573595 this is a 2.4 prescott not a 2.4B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gianni-gt Posted July 4, 2007 Share Posted July 4, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=618537 => it must be a fake.. also the with the fastest single-core runs @3.6ghz sub 30sec are not possible place 1-3 looks suspicious for me.. check the clocks... http://www.hwbot.org//listResults.do?filterBlocked=true&filterUser=true&limit=30&applicationId=6&cpuSubFamilyId=5 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=616081 => not an AMD cpu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Learnin' Posted July 6, 2007 Share Posted July 6, 2007 Is this score in 3DMark2001SE valid, http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=612557 ? The screenshot doesn't seem to show the resolution. http://aycu13.webshots.com/image/17772/2001113185884760605_rs.jpg I tried to use the report button but this happened: Crap. An error happened.We could blame this on you but it's most likely our crappy coding skills. You could try again or nudge our developpers for fixing this. Error messagejava.lang.NullPointerException: null Error stack traceorg.hwbot.web.actions.ReportResultAction.run line 45 org.hwbot.web.actions.HwbotAction.execute line 29 org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.processActionPerform line 419 org.apache.struts.action.RequestProcessor.process line 224 org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.process line 1194 org.apache.struts.action.ActionServlet.doPost line 432 javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service line 709 javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service line 802 org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter line 237 org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter line 157 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richba5tard Posted July 6, 2007 Share Posted July 6, 2007 Thanks JL, I've checked the code and we didn't check whether the user is logged in or not. You need to be logged in in order to report results. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Learnin' Posted July 6, 2007 Share Posted July 6, 2007 It would have been worth over 10 boints if he did not have higher scores and you did not copy and paste the full description from the moderation thread: "no boints: nothing, but doubtful or reported results from this category should still be blocked" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Learnin' Posted July 6, 2007 Share Posted July 6, 2007 Well if the resolution isn't visible in the 3DMark popup I thought it was not an acceptable screenshot? That is/was what I was asking in the first place.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brx Posted July 7, 2007 Share Posted July 7, 2007 these results are with Coppermine core, but they are under P3 500Mhz Katmai core result table (Coppermine is more overclockable and with full speed cache, Katmai is with half speed). results taken from this link: http://hwbot.org/ResultBrowseByProcessor.do?cpuModelId=1006 CPU-Z.: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574128 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602373 = no verification url or image http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=619071 PiFast. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=619072 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=595982 SuperPi. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=619073 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=595983 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574125 SuperPi 32m. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=619293 wPrime 1024m. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=619368 wPrime 32m. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=619074 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted July 8, 2007 Crew Share Posted July 8, 2007 hi this results are in the false category. he's using a p II 266 not a P II 233. please can anybody move it in the right category. thanks pi-fast http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617395 cpu-z http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617393 super-pi http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617401 wprime32m http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617402 wprime1024m http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617405 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted July 8, 2007 Share Posted July 8, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617585 Result on E6600, but category Q6600. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=619242 Result on S939, but category S754. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617196 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=560884 Result very disputable and unreal. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=526161 Result on Pentium II 400, but category Pentium II Celeron 500. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted July 10, 2007 Crew Share Posted July 10, 2007 hithis results are in the false category. he's using a p II 266 not a P II 233. please can anybody move it in the right category. thanks pi-fast http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617395 cpu-z http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617393 super-pi http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617401 wprime32m http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617402 wprime1024m http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617405 anyone ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted July 11, 2007 Share Posted July 11, 2007 To the aforesaid me I shall add: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622461 Result on S939, but category S754. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622456 Result on S939, but category S754. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622459 Result on S939, but category S754. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622457 Result on S939, but category S754. In a command "PurePC.pl" continuous swindlers it turns out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted July 11, 2007 Share Posted July 11, 2007 Sorry, guys, I haven't had much time lately. I'll check this out asap Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipro5 Posted July 13, 2007 Share Posted July 13, 2007 Hi guys..... Take a look at this page: http://www.hwbot.org/hallOfFame.do?type=result&applicationId=12 The first score at SINGLE VGA is 22xxx with cores at 670MHz?..... He must have submited wrong....It'll propably be SLI mode.....PLUS when I try to open it, it give me an error..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxi Posted July 14, 2007 Share Posted July 14, 2007 klopcha & turricane, all fixed. Thanks for reporting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts