Wrong Result

[M A H R A D]

Hi everybody

My CPU Code name is Windsor but wPrime Cannot identify it.

Plz check it.

 

Cheers,

M A H R A D

ShahrSakhtafzar IRAN team

[harleybro]

I hate to even post this but I am sure he has the right link. I was playing with the 06 calc and checking scores. The verification link here is for 18,4xx not 19k.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=588607

[basco]

sorry for stealing points that dont belong to me!

 

this should be an sli score!

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641645

 

thank you mods for removing

greets

[xacti]

It is fake. Too high score. He didnt show resolution.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=611610

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639390

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609915

[Narmer]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591236

score from pcmark, not from 3dmark05

[jigit]

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=598614

score from Sempron 2600+ (Palermo) Socket 754, not from Socket 462 (Thoroughbred)

[demiurg]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=548008

All is corrected, unblock result, please.

[Woomack]

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=642030

8800GTX card , not 9700 mobility class

(info even in description)

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=504614

info from forum -> Powercolor 9500@9700, not 9700 mobility

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=632606

looks like sli score, too high score for single 8600 gts with so low clocks and c2d 3,2GHz

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=641832

fake or sli score , too low clocks/cpu speed for 11k+ on single card

[steelrat]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629820 - cheat, videocard is 1950PRo, seen on screen.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=630628 - cheat, dont see videocard\cpu else.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629761 - cheat, special hidden resolution and name of videocard.

[gianni-gt]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641905 => no AMD

[Massman]

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=642030

8800GTX card , not 9700 mobility class

(info even in description)

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=504614

info from forum -> Powercolor 9500@9700, not 9700 mobility

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=632606

looks like sli score, too high score for single 8600 gts with so low clocks and c2d 3,2GHz

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=641832

fake or sli score , too low clocks/cpu speed for 11k+ on single card

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629820 - cheat, videocard is 1950PRo, seen on screen.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=630628 - cheat, dont see videocard\cpu else.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629761 - cheat, special hidden resolution and name of videocard.

 

fixed

[Just Learnin']

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=560164 Description and screenshot show 3.4E Prescott CPU, result is in 3.4C Northwood category.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641402 Submitted four days ago, old SuperPi and no CPUZ in screenshot.

[Massman]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=560164 Description and screenshot show 3.4E Prescott CPU' date=' result is in 3.4C Northwood category.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641402 Submitted four days ago, old SuperPi and no CPUZ in screenshot.[/quote']

 

fixed

[kal_garath]

Could you please fix these results :

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634844 - Screen show 516,136sec (8min36.136sec) but written result is : 5min16sec

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632415 - Screen show 475.178sec (7min55,178sec) but written result is : 5min15sec and no CPU identification on the screen

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632145 - Screen show 241.638sec (4min1.638sec) but written result is : 2min41sec

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634877 - Screen show P4 630 s.775, but result in category Prescott 3GHz s.478

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=630012 - Screen show 11.921sec, but written result is : 11sec

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=633012 - Screen show 13029.311sec (3h37min9.310sec) but written result is : 1h30min29sec and no CPU identification

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632417 - Screen show 7899.11sec (2h11min39.110sec) but written result is : 1h19min39sec

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634703 - Screen show 2573.687sec (42min53.686sec), written result : 26min13sec and the result is under Prescott 3GHz s.478 instead of P4 630 s.775

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631114 - Screen show 1842.172sec (30min42.172sec) but written result is : 18min42sec

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634873 - Screen show P4 630 s.775, but result in category Prescott 3GHz s.478

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632691 - Screen show 3min27.689sec (207.689sec) but written result is : 147.69sec

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634871 - Screen show P4 630 s.775, but result in category Prescott 3GHz s.478

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634842 - Screen show 616.79sec, but written result is 376sec

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632124 - Screen show 453.36sec, but written result is 293sec

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632086 - Screen show 244.98sec, but written result is 164sec

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632985 - Screen show 229.45sec, but written result is 149sec

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634854 - No CPU identification on the screen

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641918 - No CPU identification on the screen

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=638218 - No CPU identification on the screen

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641572 - No CPU identification on the screen

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635731 - Is SetFSB enough to validate the CPU ?

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634879 - Screen show P4 630 s.775, but result in category Prescott 3GHz s.478

 

Thx in advance

[TASOS]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588457

Prescott 2.8A in 2.8E category

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627612

P4 Northwood 1.8@1.8 does 73sec pifast

Better score than a 1.8@3.1 GHZ

I need proof this is a valid hexus pifast version 4.1 result.

[Pepek86]

The same user has points on two submitet score on the same CPU in SuperPI

http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=9126

 

Could you please fix this results :

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634625 - Screen show 30,687sec but written result is : 30sec

[M!chalak]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=547217 - It is 6600 GT because memory frequency is too high

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=500616

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=607995

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=547069

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=609478

 

Please chcek other results of this category because is some another results on 66GT in category 66 non-GT.

 

Regards,

Paul

[Trouffman]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640908

 

--> it's an Athlon XP 1500+ not a MP one look @ the 3rd line in the validation link : "CPU PSN : AMD Athlon XP 1500+"

[v@l3nn]

and look the specification on the screenshot "AMD Athlon XP 1500+"

[Blackwarriors]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=588842 -- Not screen or valid

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639924 -- Not screen or valid

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639927 -- Not screen or valid

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639929 -- Not screen or valid

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639928 -- Not screen or valid

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576093 -- Not screen or valid

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575420 -- Not screen or valid

http://www.hwbot.org/searchMembers.do?userId=7220&name=jed040 -- No the screen with any score except CPU-Z

[Pepek86]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=616055 -- Not screen or valid

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=620093 -- Not screen or valid

[Massman]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=640908

 

--> it's an Athlon XP 1500+ not a MP one look @ the 3rd line in the validation link : "CPU PSN : AMD Athlon XP 1500+"

 

Auch, missed that

 

My mistake, sorry.

[Massman]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=616055 -- Not screen or valid

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=620093 -- Not screen or valid

 

No screen: they were uploaded via the online submition system of wPrime.

 

The invalid problem was a problem we had with early versions.

[hipro5]

HELOOOOO!..........Why isn't the below score of Super-Pi 32M in the hwbot rank?....

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=643644

 

 

.

[richba5tard]

I don't know. I forced a refresh, lets see whether it solves itself.