Undertaker Posted August 10, 2007 Share Posted August 10, 2007 hello, i reported many wrong results in "P4C 3.0Ghz Northwood" : a lot of wrong cpu code name (prescott instead of northwood etc) and in the "C2D T7200" section : a lot of T7300 or Core 2 E4/6XXX . . . Under Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted August 10, 2007 Share Posted August 10, 2007 I'll look into all the reported scores when I get back from my vacation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted August 10, 2007 Share Posted August 10, 2007 So enjoy your vacation . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted August 10, 2007 Share Posted August 10, 2007 Uh...vacation..nice....I just finished mine and I can tell you that getting back to the office really sucks. Have fun! and about Nikose's results....I really think that lacks some math knowledge Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted August 10, 2007 Share Posted August 10, 2007 A real hardware addict Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted August 10, 2007 Share Posted August 10, 2007 actually, Massman IS on vacation, he's just too addicted and he found a cybercafé Not entirely true, I have internet connection in the house I'm enjoying my vacation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted August 11, 2007 Share Posted August 11, 2007 Sorry, that was a long time ago when I thought that 3DMark 2006 has the same default resolution. My bad, I just deleted the entry from HWbot myself. BUT, soon I will bring the result with X6800, at the corect resolution, and I think you know what is going to happen then I have to retract some of the comments I made here. Now I notticed that I ran 3DM2006 in 1024 x 768 because the monitor I use for benching (15" AOC) doesn't support 1280x1024 :rotf: As soon as I change my monitor I will return with some 3DMark 2006 action, until than, no 3DMark 2006 results for me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pointhore Posted August 11, 2007 Share Posted August 11, 2007 I have to retract some of the comments I made here. Now I notticed that I ran 3DM2006 in 1024 x 768 because the monitor I use for benching (15" AOC) doesn't support 1280x1024 :rotf: As soon as I change my monitor I will return with some 3DMark 2006 action, until than, no 3DMark 2006 results for me Bring it on! :battle: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
choco13 Posted August 11, 2007 Share Posted August 11, 2007 wrong result! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=627492 it must be SLI. not single Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted August 12, 2007 Share Posted August 12, 2007 jmke: how? when I install 3DM2006 it will not allow me to set the resolution higher that 1024x768. I have nothing against starring at a black screen:D pointhore: I will, I will :evil: . I suppose you like my 3DM 2001 score Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harleybro Posted August 12, 2007 Share Posted August 12, 2007 No FM link and is HOF top 20: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=631840 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SF3D Posted August 12, 2007 Share Posted August 12, 2007 No FM link and is HOF top 20: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=631840 Fixed! Thanks harleybro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxi Posted August 12, 2007 Share Posted August 12, 2007 when I install 3DM2006 it will not allow me to set the resolution higher that 1024x768. Have you tried installing the monitor drivers? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harleybro Posted August 13, 2007 Share Posted August 13, 2007 Have you tried installing the monitor drivers? I have a 15" lcd that does the same it will run 06 but it won't allow it to run at the needed res. I solved it by giving my GF the 15" and taking her 17" lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Learnin' Posted August 13, 2007 Share Posted August 13, 2007 No CPU-Z in his CPU-Z screenshot, he hasn't got it in his SuperPi runs either, http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559972 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631540 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559994 No screenshot for this fellow: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=501281 Or this fellow: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506743 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harleybro Posted August 13, 2007 Share Posted August 13, 2007 No FM link and is HOF top 20: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=631840 It's back again. Scanned by hwbot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted August 13, 2007 Share Posted August 13, 2007 Thx for the advice guys. No, I haven't tried installing the monitor drivers, but I will Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Praz Posted August 13, 2007 Share Posted August 13, 2007 It's back again. Scanned by hwbot. Seems to be an on-going problem. Probably another six or eight top twenty entries in the 3d benches without FM verification links. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potapicus Posted August 13, 2007 Share Posted August 13, 2007 5 days ago I wrote a post, but no reaction. Pentium-3 850 MHz - http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1016 category - WinPrime1024. 1st place - 1h 50min 17sec 660ms - Cydoo (Syndrome-OC) - compare url is http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=583869 there is no screenshot and no verification link - and the cheksum is INVALID: Verfication: checksum: A6F78CC0 (invalid) and by the way - this user has 4 results in WPrime 1024 - and 3 results has invalid checksum - and there is nothing else, what can confirm the truth of this results. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted August 14, 2007 Share Posted August 14, 2007 http://hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_302 RyderOCZ's wprime scores (32m and probably 1024m) are very nice, but in the wrong place;) At least the 32m score is a Brisbane (I checked the link). There is no link to the 1024m score, just a checksum. However, the results are pretty similar (like same CPU freq), so I'm pretty sure both are Brisbane cores. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RyderOCZ Posted August 14, 2007 Share Posted August 14, 2007 Roger that...I only have 1 4400+ and it is a Brisbane Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted August 15, 2007 Share Posted August 15, 2007 Did not wish to write, but report entry similar does not work. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559024 Error is computation and the type of the processor is not specified http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=611755 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz (and this old result http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609269 ) http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609820 Similarly http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609143 Similarly http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609335 Similarly http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609261 Similarly http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609133 Similarly (No link, no screenshot) http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571436 Deceit http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581497 Result on Celeron 320, because FSB=177Mhz on screenshot and user have Celeron 320. Sorry for my bad english. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted August 15, 2007 Share Posted August 15, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634858 The resolution is not visible and there is no FM link, therefor the score is not valid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
knopflerbruce Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Roger that...I only have 1 4400+ and it is a Brisbane Would you mind editing the scores, btw? Not 100% sure I will ever be able to break those scores lol. Depends on the VX's I'm getting and how coldbugged my CPU is:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634840 Another score by Titul without visible resolution settings and FM link....Would anyone please solve this? And the one I posted above (http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634858 The resolution is not visible and there is no FM link, therefor the score is not valid.) Thank you! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts