RyderOCZ Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Would you mind editing the scores, btw? Not 100% sure I will ever be able to break those scores lol. Depends on the VX's I'm getting and how coldbugged my CPU is:) Done.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634840 Another score by Titul without visible resolution settings and FM link....Would anyone please solve this? And the one I posted above (http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634858'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634858 The resolution is not visible and there is no FM link, therefor the score is not valid.) Thank you! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634858 The resolution is not visible and there is no FM link, therefor the score is not valid. Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Did not wish to write, but report entry similar does not work. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559024 Error is computation and the type of the processor is not specified http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=611755 Result on Celeron 320, but category Celeron 2.4 Ghz (and this old result http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609269 ) http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609820 Similarly http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609143 Similarly http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609335 Similarly http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609261 Similarly http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609133 Similarly (No link, no screenshot) http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571436 Deceit http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581497 Result on Celeron 320, because FSB=177Mhz on screenshot and user have Celeron 320. Sorry for my bad english. Massman: You see my message? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Massman: You see my message? fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 fixed Thank's http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632688 Result on 2min 20 sec, not 1min 40 sec http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577375 Result invalid http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632993 Result 1 hours 14 min, not 45 min http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577428 Result invalid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Thank's http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632688 Result on 2min 20 sec, not 1min 40 sec http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577375 Result invalid http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=632993 Result 1 hours 14 min, not 45 min http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577428 Result invalid fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S_A_V Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Please check single 8600GT scores by blackwarriors62 (Syndrome-OC): http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628928 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629640 It's impossible for unmodded card with only 770MHz on core. 12 (Russian Overs) already reported about this scores (see result history), but it still not blocked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Learnin' Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Sorry for repeating myself: No CPU-Z in his CPU-Z screenshot, he hasn't got it in his SuperPi runs either, http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559972 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631540 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559994 No screenshot for this fellow: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=501281 Or this fellow: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506743 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted August 16, 2007 Share Posted August 16, 2007 Welcome back Massman, we are all happy now LE: This one is still there though... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634855 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potapicus Posted August 17, 2007 Share Posted August 17, 2007 Pentium-3 850 MHz - http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1016 category - WinPrime1024. 1st place - 1h 50min 17sec 660ms - Cydoo (Syndrome-OC) - compare url is http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=583869 there is no screenshot and no verification link - and the cheksum is INVALID: Verfication: checksum: A6F78CC0 (invalid) and by the way - this user has 4 results in WPrime 1024 - and 3 results has invalid checksum - and there is nothing else, what can confirm the truth of this results. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted August 17, 2007 Share Posted August 17, 2007 Same problem with same user, i can't understand why the results are still there.. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635601 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634855 Titul - TopMods.net , no visible resolution in the screenshot, no fm link.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted August 17, 2007 Share Posted August 17, 2007 I'll fix them next monday, now I'm ready to leave for a lanparty Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monstru Posted August 18, 2007 Share Posted August 18, 2007 Aaaaaah!! Good luck man, bring some nice clocks and Spi's from there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gianni-gt Posted August 18, 2007 Share Posted August 18, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615004 19min41sec (see screenshot) not 18min38sec!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CHimeraVirus Posted August 18, 2007 Share Posted August 18, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634859 1h33min30sec (look@screenshot) not 56min10sec. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steelrat Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 I ask that you remedied these results, because screenshot of window it is not proof. you will compare registration of my results, and you see difference. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=636501 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=636499 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=636496 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potapicus Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 Category - Pentium3 667 slot1 - http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1456 All results of user inertiacreep (OutOfSpecs.Gr) are for processor with soc370. I asked Sadhiq to separate soc370 and slot1 - and what I have? some user, who post results 13/08 - put them into wrong category - and you know why? because there where no results - I edit my results right now. Please fix this wrong results! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest CHimeraVirus Posted August 19, 2007 Share Posted August 19, 2007 look at this guy http://hwbot.org/user.do?userId=9802 almost all scores from wprime (32 and 1024) r wrong write Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crew Turrican Posted August 20, 2007 Crew Share Posted August 20, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637197 well a p1 200 @ 788mhz? worng category i guess Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pointhore Posted August 20, 2007 Share Posted August 20, 2007 No Screenshot or verification link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=637186 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potapicus Posted August 20, 2007 Share Posted August 20, 2007 It's me again. Please fix this: 1. Pentium-3 850 MHz - http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1016 category - WinPrime1024. 1st place - 1h 50min 17sec 660ms - Cydoo (Syndrome-OC) - compare url is http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=583869 there is no screenshot and no verification link - and the cheksum is INVALID: Verfication: checksum: A6F78CC0 (invalid) and by the way - this user has 4 results in WPrime 1024 - and 3 results has invalid checksum - and there is nothing else, what can confirm the truth of this results. 2. Category - Pentium3 667 slot1 - http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1456 All results of user inertiacreep (OutOfSpecs.Gr) are for processor with soc370. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potapicus Posted August 20, 2007 Share Posted August 20, 2007 So, it's monday - but the situation is the same. Does somebody fix the wrong results, what I report? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harleybro Posted August 21, 2007 Share Posted August 21, 2007 No link and in HOF: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=635144 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=637624 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxi Posted August 21, 2007 Share Posted August 21, 2007 Page 35/36 fixed - except for Chimera post #351 & potapicus post #354. No more time right now... BTW potapicus, invalid cheksums are not sufficient to block old scores, there was a problem with wPrime some time back and these results are OK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potapicus Posted August 21, 2007 Share Posted August 21, 2007 ok, forget about wprime - but wrong processor please fix... i'll be waiting for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts