another http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=582772 - category is A64 3000+, but result on Sempron.

Fixed

Can some please move his score to the X850XT PE Thread

 

http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_268

 

3Dmark 2001 - 50584 marks - Quest For Speed (OC Forums)

Processor: Intel Core 2 E6600 ... @ 3920mhz

Videocard: Radeon X850 XT @ 654/648mhz

Description: Intel Conroe E6600@3.92ghz - X850XTPE@654/648

 

His link shows a X850 XT PE

http://www.ocforums.com/showpost.php?p=4815169

Fixed

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=583361 http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=570836 Linux 1\32m Spi

Fixed

http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=570836 - and what about this result? It`s still nor blocked. It is on Linux-based OS, but he didn`t write it in description. You can compare his result on 1466MHz with my on 2036MHz. http://images.people.overclockers.ru/104867.png It cant be true - cause too high result with lower cpu frequency.

 

offtop: please delete one of Celeron M 410 here: http://hwbot.org/browseHardwareProcessors.do?cpuSubFamilyId=20

http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=570836 - and what about this result? It`s still nor blocked. It is on Linux-based OS, but he didn`t write it in description. You can compare his result on 1466MHz with my on 2036MHz. http://images.people.overclockers.ru/104867.png It cant be true - cause too high result with lower cpu frequency.

 

offtop: please delete one of Celeron M 410 here: http://hwbot.org/browseHardwareProcessors.do?cpuSubFamilyId=20

Prolly because eist is on, it's a windows XP os for sure. I blocked it anyway, because he has to enter the correct cpu speed in order to recieve points.

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=569900

 

OLD version of superpi without decimal digits

 

This score should be validated as 12.99

fixed

Verfication: no verification image or link found.

 

SuperPi - 79.22 sec - ddtung (XtremeSystems) 1.6 points

Processor: Pentium 4 1.6Ghz @ 2400mhz.

 

PiFast - 98.33 sec - ddtung (XtremeSystems)

Processor: Pentium 4 1.6Ghz @ 2400mhz

 

 

 

http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_313

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575812 x1950xtx in x1950xt category

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=585068 x1950xtx in x1950xt category

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571487 How it can be corrected? In description there are x1950xtx

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570429 We dont see "x1950 series"

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=554725 x1950xtx in x1950xt category

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=578342 x1950xtx in x1950xt category

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567279 How it can be corrected? In description there are x1950xtx

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561114 We dont see "x1950 series"

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=554532 x1950xtx in x1950xt category

 

WTF is that all? Terrible situation. Or I dont understand smth?

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575812 x1950xtx in x1950xt category

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=585068 x1950xtx in x1950xt category

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571487 How it can be corrected? In description there are x1950xtx

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570429 We dont see "x1950 series"

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=554725 x1950xtx in x1950xt category

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=578342 x1950xtx in x1950xt category

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567279 How it can be corrected? In description there are x1950xtx

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561114 We dont see "x1950 series"

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=554532 x1950xtx in x1950xt category

 

WTF is that all? Terrible situation. Or I dont understand smth?

Fixed all

...still about x1950xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561412'>http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561412 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561412 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580537 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576067 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=584987 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=565143 xtx in xt (corrected from moderator)

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=555188 xtx in xt (corrected from moderator)

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580543 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=555048 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=554860 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556938 xtx in xt (corrected from moderator)

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567272 xtx in xt (corrected from moderator)

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556802 xtx in xt (corrected from moderator) OPB :\

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556415 xtx in xt (corrected from moderator) OPB :\ No verfication

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556055 xtx in xt (corrected from moderator) OPB :\ No verfication

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=566107 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=568979 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561868 xtx in xt (corrected from moderator)

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556739 xtx in xt (corrected from moderator)

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574341 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567270 xtx in xt

I knew there were problems, but this it a lot

 

Fixed all, BIG thanks for posting, Drager !

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=579288 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=568031 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=565359 single xtx in 2*xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=568128 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567274 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=557804 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=579930 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=579920 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574345 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556098 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=584824 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=585508 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=563767 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574343 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=554283 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=554865 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=568977 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571491 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561866 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575613 xtx in xt

 

...I can find more

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571489 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=565761 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=582778 xtx in xt

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=582779 xtx in xt

 

...I forgot aquamark

Fixed all

 

Another BIG, BIG, BIG thanks mate, you're really helping us here

Please fix

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=553657 Result on Sempron 64 2800+ (E6), but category is Sempron 2800+ (D0).

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575803 Result on Celeron 320 (Prescott), but category is Celeron 2.4 Ghz (Northwood).

 

 

3Dmark 2005 score - 2418 marks on GeForce FX 5600 :lol: Unreal

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576226

 

And there and then the real result

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575387

Fixed

This thread is for the GeForce2 GTS

 

3Dmark 2001 - 6632 marks - Gorak gf2 gts (no team)

Processor: Pentium 4 'B' 2.533... @ 3500mhz

Videocard: GeForce2 GTS @ 240/242mhz

http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_206

 

Gorak gf2 gts (no team) has a GeForce2 PRO

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7653461

6600GT SLI submited as Single 6600GT

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=590933

SF3D fixed it

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=590972

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=590936

I think that is QX6700, not E6700

Fixed

Please fix

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567175 Result on GeForce 2 MX 400, but category is GeForce 2 MX 200.

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589044 Result on GeForce 2 MX 400, but category is GeForce 2 MX 200.