richba5tard Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 fixed, thx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THRASHER2 Posted March 31, 2007 Author Share Posted March 31, 2007 This member has a P4 Celeron "D" 315 Prescott 2.26ghz He posted his score in the wrong Section http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587836 CPU-Z - 3446 mhz - amd freak (PCE OC Team) Processor: Intel Celeron s478 2.2ghz @ 3446mhz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted March 31, 2007 Share Posted March 31, 2007 FIxed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THRASHER2 Posted March 31, 2007 Author Share Posted March 31, 2007 FIxed Thanks "That was QUICK" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted March 31, 2007 Share Posted March 31, 2007 Please fix http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589040 Result on GeForce 2 MX 400, but category is GeForce 2 MX 200. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577679 Result on GeForce 2 MX 400, but category is GeForce 2 MX 200. I think in Aquamark the same situation, but I can not prove. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=592492 In a screenshot there is no mention of a videocard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaXtoRZP Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 Please fix: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=572204 User submitted a result of 3DMark05 instead of PCMark05 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=592047'>http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=592047 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=592047 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=590583 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=590582 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593005 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591928 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587712 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=591144 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=590934 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587978 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=592756 Than is all QX6700, not E6700! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THRASHER2 Posted April 3, 2007 Author Share Posted April 3, 2007 Processor AMD Duron 1.2ghz http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_497 SuperPi - 89.88 sec - Widowmaker (OCTeamFinland) - (AMD Duron 1.2ghz @ 1200mhz) He is running a Sempron CPU SuperPi - 103.5 sec - lucadue (Hardware Upgrad...) no verification image or link found. Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THRASHER2 Posted April 3, 2007 Author Share Posted April 3, 2007 Processor AMD Duron 1.2ghzhttp://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_497 SuperPi - 89.88 sec - Widowmaker (OCTeamFinland) - (AMD Duron 1.2ghz @ 1200mhz) He is running a Sempron CPU SuperPi - 103.5 sec - lucadue (Hardware Upgrad...) no verification image or link found. Thanks Any updates I am scraping up as much points as i can Big Thanks #8th here I come Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted April 6, 2007 Share Posted April 6, 2007 They are already fixed Good work sf3d, jmke and RB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THRASHER2 Posted April 6, 2007 Author Share Posted April 6, 2007 They are already fixed Good work sf3d, jmke and RB. My thanks goes out to all the Mods and Admin's You guys do a GREAT JOB! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted April 6, 2007 Share Posted April 6, 2007 Again posted ! Please fix http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589040 Result on GeForce 2 MX 400, but category is GeForce 2 MX 200. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577679 Result on GeForce 2 MX 400, but category is GeForce 2 MX 200. I think in Aquamark the same situation, but I can not prove. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=592492 In a screenshot there is no mention of a videocard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaXtoRZP Posted April 7, 2007 Share Posted April 7, 2007 I cannot understand such incredible results in SuperPi 32M made by Hinnavaatlus team: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594657 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594659 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594581 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594614 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594602 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594601 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594615 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594628 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594648 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594612 and others..... real cheaters.......Im angry of those guys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=594186 Once again - QX6700 in E6700 section Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594657 and others This is not cheat , this is just SuperPI 1M in SuperPI 32M section. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 All fixed. @ MaXtoRZP: These are not cheats, but their scores were scanned out of the superpi32M thread whereas they should be scanned out of the 1M thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 Please fix http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589040 Result on GeForce 2 MX 400, but category is GeForce 2 MX 200. This user again post wrong result: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=587679 (Result on GeForce 2 MX 400, but category is GeForce 2 MX 200 ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted April 8, 2007 Share Posted April 8, 2007 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 9, 2007 Share Posted April 9, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=595055 QX6700 in E6700 section Why they are doing this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaXtoRZP Posted April 10, 2007 Share Posted April 10, 2007 2 Massman, demiurg I know that there are not cheats. But if anybody didn't paid an attention for that - they would be the best in SuperPi32m till now. I can't understand why so experienced members made such mistakes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted April 10, 2007 Share Posted April 10, 2007 this is an autodetect of HWBot of the 6700 string, nothing to do with user error. Ahy chance to fix it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harleybro Posted April 10, 2007 Share Posted April 10, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=557196 Result posted is an error finish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted April 10, 2007 Share Posted April 10, 2007 Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Learnin' Posted April 11, 2007 Share Posted April 11, 2007 Hello! Result posted in Pentium 'B' category, validation link shows CPU to be an 'ES' http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577268 Is just a screenshot ok to submit for wPrime? I have had scores that were excellent but failed checksum.I question whether this would pass the checksum validation: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=595484 How is this determined to be a Pentium 4 'B' ? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=563524 Thanks for your concern. JL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted April 11, 2007 Share Posted April 11, 2007 It's not because it's an ES that it's not a pentium 'B' There's only one pentium 4 cpu that's clocked at 3.06 stock, so all scores are legit Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts