Massman Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 another http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=582772 - category is A64 3000+, but result on Sempron. Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THRASHER2 Posted February 23, 2007 Author Share Posted February 23, 2007 Can some please move his score to the X850XT PE Thread http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_268 3Dmark 2001 - 50584 marks - Quest For Speed (OC Forums) Processor: Intel Core 2 E6600 ... @ 3920mhz Videocard: Radeon X850 XT @ 654/648mhz Description: Intel Conroe E6600@3.92ghz - X850XTPE@654/648 His link shows a X850 XT PE http://www.ocforums.com/showpost.php?p=4815169 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted February 23, 2007 Share Posted February 23, 2007 Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drager Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=583361 http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=570836 Linux 1\32m Spi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted February 24, 2007 Share Posted February 24, 2007 Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drager Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=570836 - and what about this result? It`s still nor blocked. It is on Linux-based OS, but he didn`t write it in description. You can compare his result on 1466MHz with my on 2036MHz. http://images.people.overclockers.ru/104867.png It cant be true - cause too high result with lower cpu frequency. offtop: please delete one of Celeron M 410 here: http://hwbot.org/browseHardwareProcessors.do?cpuSubFamilyId=20 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted February 28, 2007 Share Posted February 28, 2007 http://hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=570836 - and what about this result? It`s still nor blocked. It is on Linux-based OS, but he didn`t write it in description. You can compare his result on 1466MHz with my on 2036MHz. http://images.people.overclockers.ru/104867.png It cant be true - cause too high result with lower cpu frequency. offtop: please delete one of Celeron M 410 here: http://hwbot.org/browseHardwareProcessors.do?cpuSubFamilyId=20 Prolly because eist is on, it's a windows XP os for sure. I blocked it anyway, because he has to enter the correct cpu speed in order to recieve points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TASOS Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=569900 OLD version of superpi without decimal digits This score should be validated as 12.99 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted March 1, 2007 Share Posted March 1, 2007 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THRASHER2 Posted March 2, 2007 Author Share Posted March 2, 2007 Verfication: no verification image or link found. SuperPi - 79.22 sec - ddtung (XtremeSystems) 1.6 points Processor: Pentium 4 1.6Ghz @ 2400mhz. PiFast - 98.33 sec - ddtung (XtremeSystems) Processor: Pentium 4 1.6Ghz @ 2400mhz http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_313 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drager Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575812 x1950xtx in x1950xt category http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=585068 x1950xtx in x1950xt category http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571487 How it can be corrected? In description there are x1950xtx http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570429 We dont see "x1950 series" http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=554725 x1950xtx in x1950xt category http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=578342 x1950xtx in x1950xt category http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567279 How it can be corrected? In description there are x1950xtx http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561114 We dont see "x1950 series" http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=554532 x1950xtx in x1950xt category WTF is that all? Terrible situation. Or I dont understand smth? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted March 3, 2007 Share Posted March 3, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575812 x1950xtx in x1950xt categoryhttp://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=585068 x1950xtx in x1950xt category http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571487 How it can be corrected? In description there are x1950xtx http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570429 We dont see "x1950 series" http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=554725 x1950xtx in x1950xt category http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=578342 x1950xtx in x1950xt category http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567279 How it can be corrected? In description there are x1950xtx http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561114 We dont see "x1950 series" http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=554532 x1950xtx in x1950xt category WTF is that all? Terrible situation. Or I dont understand smth? Fixed all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drager Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 ...still about x1950xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561412'>http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561412 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561412 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580537 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576067 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=584987 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=565143 xtx in xt (corrected from moderator) http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=555188 xtx in xt (corrected from moderator) http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580543 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=555048 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=554860 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556938 xtx in xt (corrected from moderator) http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567272 xtx in xt (corrected from moderator) http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556802 xtx in xt (corrected from moderator) OPB :\ http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556415 xtx in xt (corrected from moderator) OPB :\ No verfication http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556055 xtx in xt (corrected from moderator) OPB :\ No verfication http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=566107 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=568979 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561868 xtx in xt (corrected from moderator) http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556739 xtx in xt (corrected from moderator) http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574341 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567270 xtx in xt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 I knew there were problems, but this it a lot Fixed all, BIG thanks for posting, Drager ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drager Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=579288 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=568031 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=565359 single xtx in 2*xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=568128 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567274 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=557804 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=579930 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=579920 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574345 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556098 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=584824 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=585508 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=563767 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574343 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=554283 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=554865 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=568977 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571491 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=561866 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575613 xtx in xt ...I can find more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drager Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571489 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=565761 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=582778 xtx in xt http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=582779 xtx in xt ...I forgot aquamark Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted March 4, 2007 Share Posted March 4, 2007 Fixed all Another BIG, BIG, BIG thanks mate, you're really helping us here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted March 18, 2007 Share Posted March 18, 2007 Please fix http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=553657 Result on Sempron 64 2800+ (E6), but category is Sempron 2800+ (D0). http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575803 Result on Celeron 320 (Prescott), but category is Celeron 2.4 Ghz (Northwood). 3Dmark 2005 score - 2418 marks on GeForce FX 5600 :lol: Unreal http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=576226 And there and then the real result http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575387 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted March 19, 2007 Share Posted March 19, 2007 Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THRASHER2 Posted March 22, 2007 Author Share Posted March 22, 2007 This thread is for the GeForce2 GTS 3Dmark 2001 - 6632 marks - Gorak gf2 gts (no team) Processor: Pentium 4 'B' 2.533... @ 3500mhz Videocard: GeForce2 GTS @ 240/242mhz http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_206 Gorak gf2 gts (no team) has a GeForce2 PRO http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=7653461 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gorod Posted March 24, 2007 Share Posted March 24, 2007 6600GT SLI submited as Single 6600GT http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=590933 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted March 24, 2007 Share Posted March 24, 2007 SF3D fixed it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
demiurg Posted March 25, 2007 Share Posted March 25, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=590972 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=590936 I think that is QX6700, not E6700 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted March 25, 2007 Share Posted March 25, 2007 Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted March 30, 2007 Share Posted March 30, 2007 Please fix http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567175 Result on GeForce 2 MX 400, but category is GeForce 2 MX 200. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589044 Result on GeForce 2 MX 400, but category is GeForce 2 MX 200. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts