hipro5 Posted April 20, 2007 Share Posted April 20, 2007 This is with SINGLE 8800GTX......Could someone please fix it?......Thanks guys..... http://www.thelab.gr/showthread.php?postid=535443#post535443 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Febril Posted April 20, 2007 Share Posted April 20, 2007 Hi... Excuse my english... There is 2 errors: http://www.hwbot.org/compareProcessorResult.do?resultId=555485#result#result The WR is a Celeron 1000 and not a 850... http://www.hwbot.org/compareProcessorResult.do?resultId=585563#result#result The WR is a Celeron D 2,53GHz (Prescott) and not a 2.5Ghz Nortwood Thanks...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flasker Posted April 21, 2007 Share Posted April 21, 2007 Hi Submitted 5 results on April 18 on my forum, 3 are wrong , 2 have yet to be picked up. Should be single 8800 GTS 640 Mb http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=597899 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=598322 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=598344 These 2 not picked up http://www.bleedinedgesupport.com/ocz/forum/showpost.php?p=217631&postcount=34 http://www.bleedinedgesupport.com/ocz/forum/showpost.php?p=217628&postcount=32 Thanks Guys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THRASHER2 Posted April 21, 2007 Author Share Posted April 21, 2007 these results are in the wrong thread They should be in the AMD Athlon 64 3600+ X2 Windsor results http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1139 CPU-Z - 3504 mhz - fr@me (baika10vers) CPU-Z - 2300.94 mhz - Sebastian (AwardFabrik) Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted April 21, 2007 Share Posted April 21, 2007 All fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Febril Posted April 21, 2007 Share Posted April 21, 2007 I'm sorry but this 2 errors are not fixed: http://www.hwbot.org/compareProcessorResult.do?resultId=555485#result The WR is a Celeron 1000 and not a 850... http://www.hwbot.org/compareProcessorResult.do?resultId=556285#result The WR is a Celeron D 2,53GHz (Prescott) and not a 2.5Ghz Nortwood .... And in this 2 results: http://www.hwbot.org/compareProcessorResult.do?resultId=568570#result#result http://www.hwbot.org/compareProcessorResult.do?resultId=568566#result#result The two first benchs with 2 CPU, this is normal? I have already post this yesterday in request features so i don't know if i can announce this on this post.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted April 21, 2007 Share Posted April 21, 2007 The first one appears to be an celeron 850ES with unlocked multiplier. Second one is fixed I can't change the two last links, though. We're working on the extra support for dual cpu's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Febril Posted April 21, 2007 Share Posted April 21, 2007 Thanks.... But the CPUz's validation with celeron 850ES indicate a celeron 1000 This is normal? It's like that with a with unlock multiplier? With CPUz that indicates the specification according to the multiplier ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted April 21, 2007 Share Posted April 21, 2007 Thanks....But the CPUz's validation with celeron 850ES indicate a celeron 1000 This is normal? It's like that with a with unlock multiplier? With CPUz that indicates the specification according to the multiplier ? Yes, I think so. Cpu-z reads the 10x MP and thinks that it's a 100x10 = 1000MHz. celeron, but in fact it's an 850. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Febril Posted April 21, 2007 Share Posted April 21, 2007 So the ES CPU should not they not be prohibited because it's to easy and there is always a doubt.... ? For exemple, i can with all my CPU benching in the category below and say it's a ES...... I know that the majority of people are honest..... but we can't check that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted April 21, 2007 Share Posted April 21, 2007 So the ES CPU should not they not be prohibited because it's to easy and there is always a doubt.... ?For exemple, i can with all my CPU benching in the category below and say it's a ES...... I know that the majority of people are honest..... but we can't check that There is no reason to block ES scores. If someone uses his ES to submit in multiple categories, we'll find out. I searched for such entries and this user is as honest as someone can be Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Febril Posted April 21, 2007 Share Posted April 21, 2007 OK...... Thanks..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flasker Posted April 21, 2007 Share Posted April 21, 2007 Still 3 errors these should be single 8800GTS 640 Mb http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=598467 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=598470 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=598344 Is the bot is picking up the 8500 sli ready memory in the description and assuming I have 2 8800s? I can edit it out if this is the case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted April 21, 2007 Share Posted April 21, 2007 Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cowie33 Posted April 23, 2007 Share Posted April 23, 2007 it seems theres a few 68GS'S in the 68nu nv41 cat. under more than one bench test http://www.crazypc.ro/forum/showpost.php?p=94510 http://aqm4.invisionzone.com/index.php?view=findpost&showtopic=429&p=7241 http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=683376 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=411265 http://www.crazypc.ro/forum/showpost.php?p=94351 http://img92.imageshack.us/img92/2257/67757ca.jpg this card is nv42 ddr3 http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=16870&thumb=false http://www.hwbot.org/signature.img?iid=16861&thumb=false and what kind of varificatoin is this????not showing a card?? or nothing?? http://img159.imageshack.us/img159/5483/t260034ghz6800535x550inhc2.jpg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THRASHER2 Posted April 23, 2007 Author Share Posted April 23, 2007 these results are in the wrong thread They should be in the AMD Athlon 64 3600+ X2 Windsor results <--- All of these guys have there scores in both Windsor and Brisbane Results http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1139 CPU-Z - 2300.94 mhz - Sebastian (AwardFabrik) http://valid.x86-secret.com/cache/175321.png CPU-Z - 2512 mhz - Pyra (Tygodnik Komput...) http://img162.imageshack.us/my.php?image=pyraxa7.jpg CPU-Z - 2010 mhz - nand2k6 (TipidPC) http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=160632 Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginner Posted April 26, 2007 Share Posted April 26, 2007 results posted a bit wrongly he posted as 1777 marks, but the ORB link says 1177, http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=570563 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ginner Posted April 27, 2007 Share Posted April 27, 2007 it said it was verified by a moderator, so couldn't set it under suspicion where i saw it.. thats why i wrote it inhere Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted April 28, 2007 Share Posted April 28, 2007 Again. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=597625 Result on GeForce 2 MX 400, but category is GeForce 2 MX 200. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=597626 Result on GeForce 2 MX 400, but category is GeForce 2 MX 200. The user has changed a screenshot: has changed 400 on 200, it is visible on dim color of figure 200. Links on ORB in screenshots show that card MX400. Example http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=9166472 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589477 Result on GeForce 4 MX 440, but category is GeForce 4 MX 440-SE. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=590065 Result on GeForce 4 MX 440, but category is GeForce 4 MX 440-SE. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=557135 Result on GeForce 4 MX 440, but category is GeForce 4 MX 440-SE. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567590 Result on GeForce 4 MX 440, but category is GeForce 4 MX 440-SE. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=590069 Result on GeForce 4 MX 440, but category is GeForce 4 MX 440-SE. No screenshot (but i sure result on GeForce 4 MX 440): http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589476 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=589586 User change default adjustments 3D Mark: Texture Format 16bit and Z-Buffer Depth 16bit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gianni-gt Posted April 28, 2007 Share Posted April 28, 2007 hi... this is defenetly a fake! http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=500885 this pi time is not possible with this clocks! to compare the score of el snoro (fully tweaked): http://img412.imageshack.us/img412/2148/3523mhz1648v4gq.jpg cya gianni Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Learnin' Posted May 2, 2007 Share Posted May 2, 2007 Curious if this Mobile CPU with different multi belongs with the regular P4 533FSB 3.06 GHz Northwoods? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559219 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S_A_V Posted May 3, 2007 Share Posted May 3, 2007 6800GT SLI results in single card cathegory: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=507511 - this has been verified as correct by a moderator http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=554010 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=584369 Please fix. Thx. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Learnin' Posted May 3, 2007 Share Posted May 3, 2007 This one isn't: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559219 it is a Pentium 4 'M', in the Pentium 4 'B' category. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Learnin' Posted May 3, 2007 Share Posted May 3, 2007 Different multiplier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redratamd Posted May 3, 2007 Share Posted May 3, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=595298 I think ,that's a fake ,because it's not the format likes Pi mod 1.5 with xp. And ,it's not possible to do a better time with a lower frequency of 600Mhz. It's not possible. Wait and see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts