Wrong Result

[harleybro]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601800

 

Dual core on a single core cpu? Missing libraries never installed?

[Massman]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601800

 

Dual core on a single core cpu? Missing libraries never installed?

Looks valid to me. What exactly do you think is suspicious about this score?

[richba5tard]

Yeah if you compare to other 520's it seems like a valid score. HT gets detected as dual core.

[harleybro]

Ok about the HT just haven't seen any others show as a dual core or two seperate cores. Also the bottom of the box show that the "missing libraries" wheren't installed. Just checking since I need to get a gauge of what scores I need when I throw mine back in the mobo.

[redratamd]

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=595298

I think ,that's a fake ,because it's not the format likes Pi mod 1.5 with xp.

And ,it's not possible to do a better time with a lower frequency of 600Mhz.

It's not possible.

 

Wait and see.

it was run on linux.. blocked.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602609

 

Hi.

That's the same thing,one more time with linux.

[Massman]

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=595298

I think ,that's a fake ,because it's not the format likes Pi mod 1.5 with xp.

And ,it's not possible to do a better time with a lower frequency of 600Mhz.

It's not possible.

 

Wait and see.

it was run on linux.. blocked.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602609

 

Hi.

That's the same thing,one more time with linux.

blocked.

[redratamd]

Thank's.Because it's easy to do this bench with linux.

[Ginner]

found another one that was verified by a moderator.. a Q6600 wPrime run, as a E6600..

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602474

[Massman]

found another one that was verified by a moderator.. a Q6600 wPrime run, as a E6600..

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602474

wPrime runs submitted via the site are automaticly verified if the checksum matches.

 

I fixed the score.

[Ginner]

as well as several other runs under E6700 are also QX6700. everyone in E6700 wPrime 32M under 17.xxx seconds are false(to be moved to right place)...

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=602648 (he got 2 QX6700 under E6700, anonymous)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=601014

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=602078 (as are all of his E6700 scores, AnRo)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=595815

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=598307

 

 

This one has no verification link, but compared to the other QX6700, it looks pretty similar, so i would guess it's also a QX6700

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=596235

[Nassuz]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=590285 Hes got first place with a underclocked gfx? Sure this must be another gfx and not a X1950XT hes using, no link either, no sweat we know this guy is good:)

 

 

Can someone look into this ....thanks

[harleybro]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602514

 

Says in link 2x8800gts’s in the description but it's posted in single card area

[Lanc]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601763

 

2x Radeon 9500 ? Transfer this result to single card, becouse this is unreal to have 2x 9500 on 1 mainboard ;]

[Turrican]

hi guys

 

here's a super pi results of a duron 1800 which is in the wrong categorie (athlon xp-m 1800+)

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604359

[klopcha]

Fake result: http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=603156'>http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=603156 (In 2.5 times exceeds a world record)

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId Verification link - does not work and the user closes the name of a videocard in window 3D Mark

[Massman]

Fixed

[klopcha]

I apologize for the idle reference

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=603320 Verification link - does not work and the user closes the name of a videocard in window 3D Mark

[klopcha]

I apologize for the idle reference

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=603320 Verification link - does not work and the user closes the name of a videocard in window 3D Mark

Why you do not correct result?

 

 

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=606922 Result on Radeon 9600, but category is GeForce 3 Ti500.

[redratamd]

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=178340

 

It's not good in the 3800+ core orleans am2.

The cpu-z is maybe wrong.

 

http://hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1138

[klopcha]

the other one with MX, doesn't see a reason why he would sheet that one, score is in line with other results;

higher OC on card + higher OC on CPU

Simply it would be desirable a good screenshot with the name of a videocard or working link ORB

 

 

Fixed

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=545423 Result on Pentium 641, but category is Pentium 640.

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=539224 Similarly

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=503534 Similarly

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573557 Result on Celeron 320 (90nm), but category is Celeron 2.4Ghz (0.13).

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601222 No screenshot, no link

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=597062 No screenshot, no link

[Massman]

http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=178340

 

It's not good in the 3800+ core orleans am2.

The cpu-z is maybe wrong.

 

http://hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1138

It's a Lima core, cpu-z bug.

[Febril]

Hi..

There is 2 same categorie for intel pentium 2 celeron 500Mhz s370:

http://www.hwbot.org/compareProcessorResult.do?resultId=592847#result

http://www.hwbot.org/compareProcessorResult.do?resultId=605479#result

[neoforce2007]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=552173 - card used in this test is not TC. So mismatch category.

[klopcha]

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573283 User change default adjustments 3D Mark: Texture Format 16bit .

[Massman]

fixed