klopcha Posted May 25, 2007 Share Posted May 25, 2007 Fixedhttp://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=545423 Result on Pentium 641, but category is Pentium 640. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=539224 Similarly http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=503534 Similarly http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573557 Result on Celeron 320 (90nm), but category is Celeron 2.4Ghz (0.13). http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601222 No screenshot, no link http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=597062 No screenshot, no link Fixed please! http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=553150 The reference and screenshot are not loaded. http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=593958 The screenshot is not loaded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted May 25, 2007 Share Posted May 25, 2007 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drager Posted May 26, 2007 Share Posted May 26, 2007 Global ranking For CPU-Z team OCX: doubled onepagebook`s result with x6800 (8th and 9th place). http://hwbot.org/listResults.do?applicationId=13&teamId=132&filterUser=true Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Learnin' Posted May 26, 2007 Share Posted May 26, 2007 I believe this is a P4C in the P4B section: http://www.hwbot.org/compareProcessorResult.do?resultId=608479#result CPU-Z in screenshot shows stepping 9 Revision D1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted May 26, 2007 Share Posted May 26, 2007 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Learnin' Posted May 26, 2007 Share Posted May 26, 2007 My apologies! I think that the previous score may have been right now (my bad) sorry! I was searching intels Processor Specs and it seems there were P4B's with those specs? You are sure there aren't P4B processors with that stepping and revision? If so here are more he submitted in the P4 B categories: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569343 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569340 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569338 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569345 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569396 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569395 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THRASHER2 Posted May 27, 2007 Author Share Posted May 27, 2007 Pentium 4 1.6Ghz willamette http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_313'>http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_313 Members Piou Piou, Jaska, _remus_ & ddtung all have northwood Pentium 4 1.6Ghz Cpu's Can a Mod please move all there Scores to the Pentium 4 1.6Ghz northwood ranks http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1315 CPU-Z - 3207 mhz - Piou Piou (OverClocking-Ma...) SuperPi - 124.19 sec - Jaska (OCTeamFinland) CPU-Z - 1611 mhz - _remus_ (OCTeamFinland) CPU-Z - 2400 mhz - ddtung (XtremeSystems) SuperPi 32m - 1h 12min 3sec 880ms - ddtung (XtremeSystems) wPrime 1024m - 1h 19min 57sec 970ms - ddtung (XtremeSystems) wPrime 32m - 2min 29sec 170ms - ddtung (XtremeSystems) http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_313 THanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Febril Posted May 27, 2007 Share Posted May 27, 2007 I'im sorry but the problem with two sames categories celeron 500Mhs s.370 is always..... I thinks it's a melange with slot 1, PII 500Mhz and s.370..... I know that it' older CPU....but...... Excuse my english and very thanks for all your make..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted May 28, 2007 Share Posted May 28, 2007 I'im sorry but the problem with two sames categories celeron 500Mhs s.370 is always.....I thinks it's a melange with slot 1, PII 500Mhz and s.370..... I know that it' older CPU....but...... Excuse my english and very thanks for all your make..... I'll check it out as soon as possible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THEROCK Posted May 28, 2007 Share Posted May 28, 2007 PurePC.pl is a very strange team (IMO they cheat): http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=554076 ...He's got 9.100 graphics score with 6600 clocked 585/292. Yeah rigth! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=600567 ...almost stock Radeon 9600 and Barton@2,1Ghz and he is the first. LOL? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=500616 ...obviously score with 6600GT! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=526339 ...again! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SF3D Posted May 28, 2007 Share Posted May 28, 2007 Those 6600GT scores are done with MSI 6600 Diamond with ddr3 mem. It's physically same as GT, but named as 6600. Second one was 06 with 1024x768 resolution. Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
klopcha Posted May 28, 2007 Share Posted May 28, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567523 Result on Athlon XP-M, but category is Athlon XP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted May 28, 2007 Share Posted May 28, 2007 fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Learnin' Posted May 28, 2007 Share Posted May 28, 2007 Invalid verification link: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559287 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=596617 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=596616 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571390 Screenshot link no good: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=595232 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=595231 No CPU-Z in SuperPI screenie: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594997 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556027 Also are these acceptable screenshots for 3DMark?: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577098 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580937 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=577498 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575561 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581155 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574925 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580758 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581162 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574972 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=575622 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=574976 How about these screenshots for Pifast, acceptable?: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=595273 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=595179 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THRASHER2 Posted May 29, 2007 Author Share Posted May 29, 2007 Pentium 4 1.6Ghz willamettehttp://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_313'>http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_313 Members Piou Piou, Jaska, _remus_ & ddtung all have northwood Pentium 4 1.6Ghz Cpu's Can a Mod please move all there Scores to the Pentium 4 1.6Ghz northwood ranks http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1315 CPU-Z - 3207 mhz - Piou Piou (OverClocking-Ma...) SuperPi - 124.19 sec - Jaska (OCTeamFinland) CPU-Z - 1611 mhz - _remus_ (OCTeamFinland) CPU-Z - 2400 mhz - ddtung (XtremeSystems) SuperPi 32m - 1h 12min 3sec 880ms - ddtung (XtremeSystems) wPrime 1024m - 1h 19min 57sec 970ms - ddtung (XtremeSystems) wPrime 32m - 2min 29sec 170ms - ddtung (XtremeSystems) http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_313 THanks Any luck looking at these error Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted May 29, 2007 Share Posted May 29, 2007 Give me some time . Got examinations coming up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Just Learnin' Posted May 29, 2007 Share Posted May 29, 2007 Give me some time . Got examinations coming up Hope your not all alone in this section! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THEROCK Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=554076 Again, with these clocks there is no way that he scored 9.100 on graphics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 All fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NiCu Posted May 30, 2007 Share Posted May 30, 2007 Though they're marked as "verified by a moderator" http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556635 shows Windsor in the cpu-z readout on the screenshot, even though it has been submitted as a Toledo core. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=547062 was found to have a dead screenshot link when trying to see if it's the same situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mind Posted May 31, 2007 Share Posted May 31, 2007 Single 8600GT: 1. 3Dmark 2005 - 18824 marks - Unseen (OutOfSpecs.Gr) - (Geforce 8600 GT @ 550/700mhz ) 2 points - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=600304 //It not single? SLI? 2. 3Dmark 2005 - 15044 marks - Mind (Team MXS ModLab...) - (Geforce 8600 GT @ 999/932mhz) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609764 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxi Posted June 1, 2007 Share Posted June 1, 2007 Though they're marked as "verified by a moderator" http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556635 shows Windsor in the cpu-z readout on the screenshot, even though it has been submitted as a Toledo core. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=547062 was found to have a dead screenshot link when trying to see if it's the same situation. 1) Corrected 2) Stays. Scores not in the HOF and previously validated by a moderator remain vaild when the verification is missing--even though we really prefer to have something always. Thanks for reporting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxi Posted June 1, 2007 Share Posted June 1, 2007 Single 8600GT: 1. 3Dmark 2005 - 18824 marks - Unseen (OutOfSpecs.Gr) - (Geforce 8600 GT @ 550/700mhz ) 2 points - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=600304 //It not single? SLI? 2. 3Dmark 2005 - 15044 marks - Mind (Team MXS ModLab...) - (Geforce 8600 GT @ 999/932mhz) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=609764 Fixed, thanks for reporting Mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaXtoRZP Posted June 5, 2007 Share Posted June 5, 2007 Does anybody see the resolution settings on these screenies? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602376 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602374 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602375 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaXtoRZP Posted June 5, 2007 Share Posted June 5, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602375no reason to expect this result to be false, it is in line with the others, but yes resolution should be visible, but than again, it looks like he's using the free version, so you can only run at default settings;) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602374 no irregular result, slightly lower CPU clock than 3rd place, but higher VGA clocks, 3D03 loves GPU speed over raw CPU speed http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=602376 again, free version of 3D06 - only default settings possible, results are in line with the others at similar speeds, it puts him in 2nd instead of 3rd (your spot) because of higher CPU speed. I can understand reporting/blocking scores because they are intentionally suspicious, wrong or cheated; but it is obviously not the case here; the fact that you are also running a 8600GTS and get scores slightly lower then him, and you stand to gain points by us blocking his scores has nothing to do with it, right? ;-) No, but, it's my mistake. Excuse please. I'll be more seriouly observe the screens next time. Sorry again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts