Massman Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 We would have too much aquamark traffic . But you're right, the aquamark system is not really easy ... we'll figure something out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
S_A_V Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=606046 27.7 CPU Score in Aquamark @ only 4280MHz CPU and SLI'ed cards - impossible for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaSell Posted September 22, 2007 Share Posted September 22, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644505 - just take a look at others 631 scores in this benchmark. With 1.5ghz more it should be fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PowerToTheUsers Posted September 23, 2007 Share Posted September 23, 2007 The results in http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_812'>http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_812 should be in http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_807. The category of http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_812 is the same as http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1276. http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_814 needs merging with http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1278 and http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_815 needs merging with http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1279. Thx bump Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potapicus Posted September 23, 2007 Share Posted September 23, 2007 so, there is some problems... I test my 7200 GS on default cpu...and the result in 01 mark is higher, than the overclocked system...and in 06 mark result is the same. I post all links and orb detailed screen for 01 mark, because it can't identify my processor... and if you again will think that it's the wrong results etc.. - please DO NOT erase them. I'll give you my ORB log & pass and ypou'll inspect it in my area, ok? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Massman Posted September 23, 2007 Share Posted September 23, 2007 so, there is some problems... I test my 7200 GS on default cpu...and the result in 01 mark is higher, than the overclocked system...and in 06 mark result is the same. I post all links and orb detailed screen for 01 mark, because it can't identify my processor... and if you again will think that it's the wrong results etc.. - please DO NOT erase them. I'll give you my ORB log & pass and ypou'll inspect it in my area, ok? Have a little patience, you don't have to PM me AND post on the forums the same time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lunatic@98 Posted September 23, 2007 Share Posted September 23, 2007 pleace fix this http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625724 It´s wrong CPU-model This is en T7300 edit: http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631162 wrong time, right is 47,52 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621729 wrong time, rigth is 47,42 thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Potapicus Posted September 23, 2007 Share Posted September 23, 2007 2 Massman - it's a little bit difference - I send you in PM links for overclocked system - but now I post links for non-overclocked system (except video)... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted September 23, 2007 Share Posted September 23, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=592267 funny verification;) http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648966 need more proof,card not visible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pointhore Posted September 23, 2007 Share Posted September 23, 2007 Can you guys take a look at the X1300 256 category. http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_428 There are alot of cards with 400+ clocks on the memory. 200 is stock for memory (DDR1) and I am pretty sure DDR1 won't clock that high. Here are a few that need more proof. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648765 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=565788 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622510 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571376 Can't see resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635879 No Link or image http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569909 these two are definately questionable http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569910 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
inertiacreep Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 Posted in the Pentium 4 Mobile 1.7Ghz (Northwood-512 L2) category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639205 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562843 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639206 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639203 made with Pentium 4 Williamette 1.7ghz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
o polonos Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 Posted in the Pentium 4 Mobile 1.7Ghz (Northwood-512 L2) categoryhttp://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639205 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562843 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639206 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639203 made with Pentium 4 Williamette 1.7ghz Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drager Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 So... wrong result by THRASHER (ONLY CPU-Z) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631943 socket 478 but 775 category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631951 same http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=633696 should be qx6800, not x6800. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641320 no validation http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=514870 no vertification (but here http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=520043 and http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556416 thrasher has his screenshot imho) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562035 wrong cpu on validation page http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580669 socket 478 in 423 category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604033 no validation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
71proste Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 still not fixed: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=592267 wrong verification http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648966 need more proof,card not visible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
o polonos Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 So... wrong result by THRASHER (ONLY CPU-Z)http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631943 socket 478 but 775 category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631951 same http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=633696 should be qx6800, not x6800. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641320 no validation http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=514870 no vertification (but here http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=520043 and http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556416 thrasher has his screenshot imho) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562035 wrong cpu on validation page http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580669 socket 478 in 423 category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604033 no validation still not fixed:http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=592267 wrong verification http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648966 need more proof,card not visible Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipro5 Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649930 missing about 40000 3Dmarks....PLUS it's a 2k5 verification link and not a 2k3....... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaSell Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644505 - just take a look at others 631 scores in this benchmark. With 1.5ghz more it should be fine. Still there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lunatic@98 Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 hello? pleace look at this http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=11827&postcount=523 do overlook? or why newer things blocked? thx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
o polonos Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 hello? pleace look at this http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=11827&postcount=523 do overlook? or why newer things blocked? thx Fixed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
harleybro Posted September 24, 2007 Share Posted September 24, 2007 Are links to FM still needed for top 20 results? I know there was discussion about ss but thought you still needed an fm link for top 20 global: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648325 Obviously the wrong res on this one: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648329 This one might be legit but no cpu/gpu info and no clock rates on either just a ss. http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648178 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaSell Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559328 unreal high score with that kind of frequency Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bwanasoft Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 Can you guys take a look at the X1300 256 category. http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_428 There are alot of cards with 400+ clocks on the memory. 200 is stock for memory (DDR1) and I am pretty sure DDR1 won't clock that high. Here are a few that need more proof. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648765 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=565788 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622510 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571376 Can't see resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635879 No Link or image http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569909 these two are definately questionable http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569910 when i go on the button "see online result" come this picture what can i make - i dont buy software for big sheet paper with results Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hipro5 Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 Hmmmmfff.......What is going on with this guy anyways?.....This is a CrossFire score.... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650169 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650111 EDIT: I also added his 2k6 bench....ALSO CrossFire bench.... .....and it's NOT that he doesn't know what he's doing.......I think that he's doing it in puspose coz if you take a look at his other 2k6 bench which was done/scanned the same date and uploaded, it is OK..... http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649926 . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maxi Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 harley - first 2 fixed, 3rd is OK. @MaSell - too old to block @bwannasoft - you can make more accounts with FM Hipro the first two we're scanned @ forum, the last was online submit. He just made a mistake with the hwbot tag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Undertaker Posted September 25, 2007 Share Posted September 25, 2007 Up... ? Wrong cpu : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628637 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506055 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=546593 Need more proof : http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506893 Hello =). UP² ¿ Does the "report" on the hwbot site doesn't work ? Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts