Wrong Result

[Massman]

We would have too much aquamark traffic . But you're right, the aquamark system is not really easy ... we'll figure something out

[S_A_V]

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=606046

27.7 CPU Score in Aquamark @ only 4280MHz CPU and SLI'ed cards - impossible for sure.

[MaSell]

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644505 - just take a look at others 631 scores in this benchmark. With 1.5ghz more it should be fine.

[PowerToTheUsers]

The results in http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_812'>http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_812 should be in http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_807. The category of http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_812 is the same as http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1276.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_814 needs merging with http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1278 and http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_815 needs merging with http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1279. Thx

bump

[Potapicus]

so, there is some problems... I test my 7200 GS on default cpu...and the result in 01 mark is higher, than the overclocked system...and in 06 mark result is the same. I post all links and orb detailed screen for 01 mark, because it can't identify my processor... and if you again will think that it's the wrong results etc.. - please DO NOT erase them. I'll give you my ORB log & pass and ypou'll inspect it in my area, ok?

[Massman]

so, there is some problems... I test my 7200 GS on default cpu...and the result in 01 mark is higher, than the overclocked system...and in 06 mark result is the same. I post all links and orb detailed screen for 01 mark, because it can't identify my processor... and if you again will think that it's the wrong results etc.. - please DO NOT erase them. I'll give you my ORB log & pass and ypou'll inspect it in my area, ok?

 

Have a little patience, you don't have to PM me AND post on the forums the same time.

[lunatic@98]

pleace fix this

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=625724 It´s wrong CPU-model This is en T7300

 

edit:

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631162 wrong time, right is 47,52

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621729 wrong time, rigth is 47,42

 

thanks

[Potapicus]

2 Massman - it's a little bit difference - I send you in PM links for overclocked system - but now I post links for non-overclocked system (except video)...

[71proste]

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=592267 funny verification;)

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648966 need more proof,card not visible

[pointhore]

Can you guys take a look at the X1300 256 category. http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_428

 

There are alot of cards with 400+ clocks on the memory. 200 is stock for memory (DDR1) and I am pretty sure DDR1 won't clock that high.

 

Here are a few that need more proof.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648765

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=565788

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622510

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571376 Can't see resolution

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635879 No Link or image

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569909 these two are definately questionable

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569910

[inertiacreep]

Posted in the Pentium 4 Mobile 1.7Ghz (Northwood-512 L2) category

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639205

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562843

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639206

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639203

made with Pentium 4 Williamette 1.7ghz

[o polonos]

Posted in the Pentium 4 Mobile 1.7Ghz (Northwood-512 L2) category

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639205

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562843

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639206

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=639203

made with Pentium 4 Williamette 1.7ghz

Fixed

[Drager]

So... wrong result by THRASHER (ONLY CPU-Z)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631943 socket 478 but 775 category

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631951 same

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=633696 should be qx6800, not x6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641320 no validation

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=514870 no vertification (but here http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=520043 and http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556416 thrasher has his screenshot imho)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562035 wrong cpu on validation page

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580669 socket 478 in 423 category

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604033 no validation

[71proste]

still not fixed:

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=592267 wrong verification

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648966 need more proof,card not visible

[o polonos]

So... wrong result by THRASHER (ONLY CPU-Z)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631943 socket 478 but 775 category

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=631951 same

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=633696 should be qx6800, not x6800.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=641320 no validation

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=514870 no vertification (but here http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=520043 and http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556416 thrasher has his screenshot imho)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=562035 wrong cpu on validation page

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=580669 socket 478 in 423 category

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604033 no validation

 

still not fixed:

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=592267 wrong verification

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648966 need more proof,card not visible

 

Fixed

[hipro5]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649930

 

missing about 40000 3Dmarks....PLUS it's a 2k5 verification link and not a 2k3.......

[MaSell]

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644505 - just take a look at others 631 scores in this benchmark. With 1.5ghz more it should be fine.

 

Still there

[lunatic@98]

hello?

 

pleace look at this http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=11827&postcount=523

 

do overlook? or why newer things blocked?

 

thx

[o polonos]

hello?

 

pleace look at this http://www.hwbot.org/forum/showpost.php?p=11827&postcount=523

 

do overlook? or why newer things blocked?

 

thx

Fixed

[harleybro]

Are links to FM still needed for top 20 results? I know there was discussion about ss but thought you still needed an fm link for top 20 global:

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648325

 

Obviously the wrong res on this one:

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648329

 

This one might be legit but no cpu/gpu info and no clock rates on either just a ss.

 

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=648178

[MaSell]

http://hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=559328 unreal high score with that kind of frequency

[Bwanasoft]

Can you guys take a look at the X1300 256 category. http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=GPU_428

 

There are alot of cards with 400+ clocks on the memory. 200 is stock for memory (DDR1) and I am pretty sure DDR1 won't clock that high.

 

Here are a few that need more proof.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=648765

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=565788

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622510

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=571376 Can't see resolution

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635879 No Link or image

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569909 these two are definately questionable

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=569910

 

when i go on the button "see online result" come this picture what can i make - i dont buy software for big sheet paper with results

[hipro5]

Hmmmmfff.......What is going on with this guy anyways?.....This is a CrossFire score....

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650169

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650111

 

 

EDIT: I also added his 2k6 bench....ALSO CrossFire bench....

 

.....and it's NOT that he doesn't know what he's doing.......I think that he's doing it in puspose coz if you take a look at his other 2k6 bench which was done/scanned the same date and uploaded, it is OK.....

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=649926

 

.

[Maxi]

harley - first 2 fixed, 3rd is OK.

 

@MaSell - too old to block

 

@bwannasoft - you can make more accounts with FM

 

Hipro the first two we're scanned @ forum, the last was online submit. He just made a mistake with the hwbot tag

[Undertaker]

Up... ?

 

 

Wrong cpu :

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628637

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506055

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=546593

 

Need more proof :

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=506893

Hello =).

UP² ¿

Does the "report" on the hwbot site doesn't work ?

Thanks