Wrong Result

[zavlakas]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695088

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695462

wPrime 1.41a...

[71proste]

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=694321 cant find resolution this is pro version!!!

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693983 no resol

[lunatic@98]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654662

wrong CPU! Celeron M 420 have S479y and not S775

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570199

wrong CPU! this is Celeron M 430 with multi "13" and org. 1,73Ghz. (Cele M 420 have x12 and org. 1,60Ghz)

and this is the same screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570195 in M 430 list.

 

pleace fix this

Thx

[Bwanasoft]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654662

wrong CPU! Celeron M 420 have S479y and not S775

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570199

wrong CPU! this is Celeron M 430 with multi "13" and org. 1,73Ghz. (Cele M 420 have x12 and org. 1,60Ghz)

and this is the same screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570195 in M 430 list.

 

pleace fix this

Thx

 

 

fixed

[Bwanasoft]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695088

 

 

wPrime 1.41a...

 

loooool

 

the Valitade Picture iss the best !

[Potapicus]

Category - Pentium-3 533 MHz Slot1 Katmai.

http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1433

 

user with name spud107 (Techpowerup) use his P-3 600 MHz to make tests and put it into this category.

 

cpu-z - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=674717

pi fast - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=674725

spi1m - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=674720

wprime32 - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=674723

[klopcha]

cant find resolution this is pro version!!!

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=659724

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=659872

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=636713 - No user

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=691679 Result on GF6600 PCI-E, but category GF6600 AGP.

[S_A_V]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696821 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696837 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605563 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=603477 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=600686 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692046 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697450 - no resolution and not informative screen at all!

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635599 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617256 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=663563 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689226 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656283 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697503 - no resolution + GPUZ show card as X800Pro (category is X800GTO)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=662401 - not informative screen at all!

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677102 - no resolution and invalid orb-link

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650493 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683825 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695134 - Dupe. Look at forum post - it's Micutzu score quoted by sabinus.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573373 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570788 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=552132 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679184 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680980 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650276 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=598036 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679185 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604841'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604841 - not informative screen in forumpost

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604841 - no link and no screen, only forumpost without any verification

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679186 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684597 - 9k in 3dmark05 on single 7300GT? I don't think it's possible with only 818MHz GPU clock, even with 5ghz Yorkfield. 3dmark05 is only GPU dependent with this slow card. Low MIP Textures may be?

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684601 - the same as above. too high SM2.0 and HDR scores for only 818MHz GPU. Low MIP Textures again?

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692775 - wrong category: 7900GT in 7300GT

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617130 - Low MIP Textures for sure (25-30k higher than normal score for this card)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634426 - Low MIP Textures for sure (25-30k higher than normal score for this card)

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617133 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685854 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685173 - impossible fps in both HDR tests for only 604MHz GPU clock. 7800GTX flashed to 7800GT?

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685347 - too high score for only 604MHz GPU clock. 7800GTX flashed to 7800GT?

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615789 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680957 - 35k GFX score on single 7800GTX with only 485/655MHz? That is 10k higher than other cards with way higher clocks.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686196 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678574 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601818 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686374 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601819 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686395 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665906 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694272 - 3dmark06 with resolution 1024x768!

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697169 - unreadable and no informative screen

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567488 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696079 - 12564 in 3DMark06 with single card @ only 640/1000mhz and AMD CPU??? No orb link, no screen, forum post not accessible for guests. Description says that is 8600GTS (score in 8600GT category).

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567762 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687092 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=638637 - FPS in Deep Freeze at least on 10 higher than normal for specified card clocks (694/1008). Looks like bugged run for me.

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=630333 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=560621 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581957 - no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695256 - verification link is broken and no resolution on screen

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695258 - no resolution

[71proste]

Nice job S_A_V

[OCool]

Good work S_A_V!

 

I have a question about some CPU-Z scores of this user(http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=11914):

He has two AMD K6-2 processors with exactly the same frequency, voltage, stepping, upload time...=> maybe the same screenshot? I don't no!?

The same applies to his three AMD K6 and his three Pentium MMX!

CPU-Z is not able to distinguish between these CPUs...

 

It would be very nice if someone could check that!

[MaXtoRZP]

Massman you overlook this

 

Wrong cpu category. Brisbane in Windsor category

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690088

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690172

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690432

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690392

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690154

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690085

 

I can't see any problems of that, because there is no such category as 4200 Brisbane - it's the first.

And the second: Bris core is slower than Windsor one on the same clocks.

[Warrior_oF_Byte]

I can't see any problems of that, because there is no such category as 4200 Brisbane - it's the first.

And the second: Bris core is slower than Windsor one on the same clocks.

 

but but but but it's unfair :'( :'(

 

nevermind

[Drager]

Don't see videocard name on screenshot:

- http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594123

- http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=565935

- http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621670

- http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621668

- http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621971

- http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686681

- http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=630932

- http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628201

- http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=664115

- http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644467

 

No vertification:

- http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=598055

 

Can't open link so no vertification:

- http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622075

 

1950xtx cf edition in 1950xt category:

- http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629490

[Pepek86]

Bris core is slower than Windsor one on the same clocks.

 

Maybe on the same clocks is slower but Bris has more power to OC and max clocks will be higher

 

If brisbane 4200 hasn't category you can write to moderators to make new category.

 

but but but but it's unfair :'( :'(

 

I agree with you

 

PS: Sorry for my english

[knopflerbruce]

There will (probably) be a new category, and then the wrong scores will be moved to the right one.

[OCPerformance]

Please delate this score its not possible.

 

 

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556347

[Turrican]

no resolution visible

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698244

[topdog]

All the results below have been entered in the GeForce 8800 GT 256 Mb category but they are GeForce 8800 GT 512 Mb video cards

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693360 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691553 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691036 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685349 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693407 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687754 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690897 no proof but other benchmarks was with 512 mb

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689963 no proof that it is 256 mb

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684795 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682976 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691554 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694148 ATI Radeon 9800 XT in futuremark link, and screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb card

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694319 Same user as above but different team, ATI Radeon 9800 XT in futuremark link, and screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb card

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681706 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686510 no proof, sig in forumpost shows 8800 GT 512

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687443 Single Water Cooled EVGA 8800GT 512 indescription

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684791 no proof that it is 256 mb

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682971 same user as above, no proof that it is 256 mb

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694729 futuremark link shows 512 mb

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691322 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688062 same user as above 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689175 no proof that it is 256 mb

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682877 futuremark link shows 512

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681602 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687795 futuremark link shows 512

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691080 futuremark link shows 512

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689105 same user as above

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687509 512 in description and futuremark link

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691113 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691582 futuremark link shows 512

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690902 no proof that it is 256 mb

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688346 same as above

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682399 no proof that it is 256 mb

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687872 no proof that it is 256 mb

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681627 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693497 screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693505 screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693492 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692932 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692671 screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692583 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690637 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690475 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688443 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690718 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688440 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688435 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687545 screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687086 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691910 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686677 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686956 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686663 screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686660 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685682 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681643 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681637 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683327 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690540 no validation

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687667 no proof 8800 512 in sig

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689874 no validation

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682629 futuremark link shows 512

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688427 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694156 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683841 futuremark link shows 512

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685335 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689196 futuremark link shows 512

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685404 futuremark link shows 512

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688713 no proof

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688058 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692734 Gainward 8800GT GS

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682400 no proof, sig in forumpost shows 8800 GT 512

 

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693386 512 in description

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691370 no proof that it is 256 mb

 

 

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690436 not enough proof

 

 

Sorry for the long list but I just want my trophies back

[S_A_V]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698186 - wrong category: 8800GT in 7300GT

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697809 - wrong category: 8800Ultra in 7300GT

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697808 - wrong category: 8800GTS in 7300GT

[DopeLex]

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697936

 

=> no resolution, Settings not visible, unrealistic score for single 7800 GTX @ used Clocks.

 

Probably lower Resolution - maybe because of this, the 3DMark settings are covered.

[71proste]

Oooo yeahhh U'r right Dopelex i have raported 4-5 times already this result,so please delete it.

Score is so high because of wrong resolution or SLI!!!!!!!!!

 

and more results made by same guy without resolutions:

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=694660

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689538

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680560

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675901

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693030

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=695914

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697936

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693345

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697928

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=692353

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=696320

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689494

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693026

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697930

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693339

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680136

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=695909

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689521

 

i'm not sure about 3dm01 version He used,so please check this out

[Patagonian]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=592336 wrong videocard

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650027 wrong videocard

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656051 wrong videocard

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610412 wrong videocard

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610436 82855 Integrated vga can´t run 3dmark05, no resolution, not screenshoot, not nothing

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610418 82855 Integrated vga can´t run 3dmark06, no resolution, not screenshoot, not nothing

[MaSell]

http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610412 wrong video card

[mAlkAv!An]

Please look those results:

http://www.hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=0&teamId=0&userName=Svikens&gpu=&numberOfVideocards=0&cpu=Sempron+2800%2B+%28Athlon+XP%29+%28108%29&chipset=&model=&manufacturer=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=0&cpuId=546&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints=

The guy seems to have an AMD Sempron for Socket A, but it's not the 2800+ with Thoroughbred core, which all other guys(like me) used to bench. His cpu has got a Thorton Core...

Either it should be moved to another category(with Thorton core), needs a new category, or will be deleted.

Not that fair to have both Cores in one category cuz there's a big difference in overcklockability.

[71proste]

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=679546 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=692743 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=625838 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=671409 wrong resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=580696 no resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668984 wrong resolution

http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=661480 wrong resolution