zavlakas Posted February 5, 2008 Posted February 5, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695088 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695462 wPrime 1.41a...
71proste Posted February 6, 2008 Posted February 6, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=694321 cant find resolution this is pro version!!! http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693983 no resol
lunatic@98 Posted February 6, 2008 Posted February 6, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654662 wrong CPU! Celeron M 420 have S479y and not S775 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570199 wrong CPU! this is Celeron M 430 with multi "13" and org. 1,73Ghz. (Cele M 420 have x12 and org. 1,60Ghz) and this is the same screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570195 in M 430 list. pleace fix this Thx
Bwanasoft Posted February 7, 2008 Posted February 7, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=654662wrong CPU! Celeron M 420 have S479y and not S775 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570199 wrong CPU! this is Celeron M 430 with multi "13" and org. 1,73Ghz. (Cele M 420 have x12 and org. 1,60Ghz) and this is the same screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570195 in M 430 list. pleace fix this Thx fixed
Bwanasoft Posted February 7, 2008 Posted February 7, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695088 wPrime 1.41a... loooool the Valitade Picture iss the best !
Potapicus Posted February 7, 2008 Posted February 7, 2008 Category - Pentium-3 533 MHz Slot1 Katmai. http://www.hwbot.org/quickSearch.do?hardwareId=CPU_1433 user with name spud107 (Techpowerup) use his P-3 600 MHz to make tests and put it into this category. cpu-z - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=674717 pi fast - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=674725 spi1m - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=674720 wprime32 - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=674723
klopcha Posted February 7, 2008 Posted February 7, 2008 cant find resolution this is pro version!!! http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=659724 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=659872 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=636713 - No user http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=691679 Result on GF6600 PCI-E, but category GF6600 AGP.
S_A_V Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696821 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696837 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=605563 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=603477 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=600686 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692046 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697450 - no resolution and not informative screen at all! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=635599 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617256 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=663563 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689226 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656283 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697503 - no resolution + GPUZ show card as X800Pro (category is X800GTO) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=662401 - not informative screen at all! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=677102 - no resolution and invalid orb-link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650493 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683825 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695134 - Dupe. Look at forum post - it's Micutzu score quoted by sabinus. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=573373 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=570788 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=552132 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679184 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680980 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650276 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=598036 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679185 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604841'>http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604841 - not informative screen in forumpost http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=604841 - no link and no screen, only forumpost without any verification http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=679186 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684597 - 9k in 3dmark05 on single 7300GT? I don't think it's possible with only 818MHz GPU clock, even with 5ghz Yorkfield. 3dmark05 is only GPU dependent with this slow card. Low MIP Textures may be? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684601 - the same as above. too high SM2.0 and HDR scores for only 818MHz GPU. Low MIP Textures again? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692775 - wrong category: 7900GT in 7300GT http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617130 - Low MIP Textures for sure (25-30k higher than normal score for this card) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=634426 - Low MIP Textures for sure (25-30k higher than normal score for this card) http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=617133 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685854 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685173 - impossible fps in both HDR tests for only 604MHz GPU clock. 7800GTX flashed to 7800GT? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685347 - too high score for only 604MHz GPU clock. 7800GTX flashed to 7800GT? http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=615789 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=680957 - 35k GFX score on single 7800GTX with only 485/655MHz? That is 10k higher than other cards with way higher clocks. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686196 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=678574 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601818 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686374 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=601819 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686395 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=665906 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694272 - 3dmark06 with resolution 1024x768! http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697169 - unreadable and no informative screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567488 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=696079 - 12564 in 3DMark06 with single card @ only 640/1000mhz and AMD CPU??? No orb link, no screen, forum post not accessible for guests. Description says that is 8600GTS (score in 8600GT category). http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=567762 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687092 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=638637 - FPS in Deep Freeze at least on 10 higher than normal for specified card clocks (694/1008). Looks like bugged run for me. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=630333 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=560621 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=581957 - no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695256 - verification link is broken and no resolution on screen http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=695258 - no resolution
OCool Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 Good work S_A_V! I have a question about some CPU-Z scores of this user(http://www.hwbot.org/user.do?userId=11914): He has two AMD K6-2 processors with exactly the same frequency, voltage, stepping, upload time...=> maybe the same screenshot? I don't no!? The same applies to his three AMD K6 and his three Pentium MMX! CPU-Z is not able to distinguish between these CPUs... It would be very nice if someone could check that!
MaXtoRZP Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 Massman you overlook this Wrong cpu category. Brisbane in Windsor category http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690088 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690172 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690432 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690392 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690154 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690085 I can't see any problems of that, because there is no such category as 4200 Brisbane - it's the first. And the second: Bris core is slower than Windsor one on the same clocks.
Warrior_oF_Byte Posted February 8, 2008 Posted February 8, 2008 I can't see any problems of that, because there is no such category as 4200 Brisbane - it's the first.And the second: Bris core is slower than Windsor one on the same clocks. but but but but it's unfair :'( :'( nevermind
Drager Posted February 9, 2008 Posted February 9, 2008 Don't see videocard name on screenshot: - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=594123 - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=565935 - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621670 - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621668 - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=621971 - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686681 - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=630932 - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=628201 - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=664115 - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=644467 No vertification: - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=598055 Can't open link so no vertification: - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=622075 1950xtx cf edition in 1950xt category: - http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=629490
Pepek86 Posted February 9, 2008 Posted February 9, 2008 Bris core is slower than Windsor one on the same clocks. Maybe on the same clocks is slower but Bris has more power to OC and max clocks will be higher If brisbane 4200 hasn't category you can write to moderators to make new category. but but but but it's unfair :'( :'( I agree with you PS: Sorry for my english
knopflerbruce Posted February 9, 2008 Posted February 9, 2008 There will (probably) be a new category, and then the wrong scores will be moved to the right one.
OCPerformance Posted February 9, 2008 Posted February 9, 2008 Please delate this score its not possible. http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=556347
Crew Turrican Posted February 9, 2008 Crew Posted February 9, 2008 no resolution visible http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698244
topdog Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 All the results below have been entered in the GeForce 8800 GT 256 Mb category but they are GeForce 8800 GT 512 Mb video cards http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693360 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691553 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691036 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685349 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693407 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687754 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690897 no proof but other benchmarks was with 512 mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689963 no proof that it is 256 mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684795 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682976 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691554 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694148 ATI Radeon 9800 XT in futuremark link, and screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb card http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694319 Same user as above but different team, ATI Radeon 9800 XT in futuremark link, and screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb card http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681706 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686510 no proof, sig in forumpost shows 8800 GT 512 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687443 Single Water Cooled EVGA 8800GT 512 indescription http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=684791 no proof that it is 256 mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682971 same user as above, no proof that it is 256 mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694729 futuremark link shows 512 mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691322 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688062 same user as above 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689175 no proof that it is 256 mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682877 futuremark link shows 512 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681602 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687795 futuremark link shows 512 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691080 futuremark link shows 512 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689105 same user as above http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687509 512 in description and futuremark link http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691113 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691582 futuremark link shows 512 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690902 no proof that it is 256 mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688346 same as above http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682399 no proof that it is 256 mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687872 no proof that it is 256 mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681627 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693497 screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693505 screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693492 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692932 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692671 screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692583 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690637 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690475 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688443 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690718 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688440 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688435 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687545 screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687086 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691910 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686677 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686956 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686663 screenshot of GPU_Z displays 8800 GT 512 Mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=686660 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685682 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681643 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=681637 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683327 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690540 no validation http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=687667 no proof 8800 512 in sig http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689874 no validation http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682629 futuremark link shows 512 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688427 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=694156 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=683841 futuremark link shows 512 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685335 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=689196 futuremark link shows 512 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=685404 futuremark link shows 512 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688713 no proof http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=688058 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=692734 Gainward 8800GT GS http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=682400 no proof, sig in forumpost shows 8800 GT 512 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=693386 512 in description http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=691370 no proof that it is 256 mb http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=690436 not enough proof Sorry for the long list but I just want my trophies back
S_A_V Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=698186 - wrong category: 8800GT in 7300GT http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697809 - wrong category: 8800Ultra in 7300GT http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=697808 - wrong category: 8800GTS in 7300GT
DopeLex Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697936 => no resolution, Settings not visible, unrealistic score for single 7800 GTX @ used Clocks. Probably lower Resolution - maybe because of this, the 3DMark settings are covered.
71proste Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 Oooo yeahhh U'r right Dopelex i have raported 4-5 times already this result,so please delete it. Score is so high because of wrong resolution or SLI!!!!!!!!! and more results made by same guy without resolutions: http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=694660 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689538 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680560 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=675901 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693030 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=695914 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697936 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693345 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697928 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=692353 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=696320 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689494 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693026 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=697930 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=693339 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=680136 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=695909 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=689521 i'm not sure about 3dm01 version He used,so please check this out
Patagonian Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=592336 wrong videocard http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=650027 wrong videocard http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=656051 wrong videocard http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610412 wrong videocard http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610436 82855 Integrated vga can´t run 3dmark05, no resolution, not screenshoot, not nothing http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610418 82855 Integrated vga can´t run 3dmark06, no resolution, not screenshoot, not nothing
MaSell Posted February 10, 2008 Posted February 10, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/result.do?resultId=610412 wrong video card
mAlkAv!An Posted February 11, 2008 Posted February 11, 2008 Please look those results: http://www.hwbot.org/searchResults.do?direction=&applicationId=0&teamId=0&userName=Svikens&gpu=&numberOfVideocards=0&cpu=Sempron+2800%2B+%28Athlon+XP%29+%28108%29&chipset=&model=&manufacturer=&minScore=&maxScore=&gpuId=0&cpuId=546&chipsetId=0&modelId=0&manufacturerId=0&offset=0&displayAdvanced=false&countryId=0&dateFrom=&dateUntil=&minGpuCoreFreq=&maxGpuCoreFreq=&minGpuMemFreq=&maxGpuMemFreq=&minCpuFreq=&maxCpuFreq=&system=&minTotalPoints= The guy seems to have an AMD Sempron for Socket A, but it's not the 2800+ with Thoroughbred core, which all other guys(like me) used to bench. His cpu has got a Thorton Core... Either it should be moved to another category(with Thorton core), needs a new category, or will be deleted. Not that fair to have both Cores in one category cuz there's a big difference in overcklockability.
71proste Posted February 11, 2008 Posted February 11, 2008 http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=679546 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=692743 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=625838 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=671409 wrong resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=580696 no resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=668984 wrong resolution http://www.hwbot.org/compare.do?resultId=661480 wrong resolution
Recommended Posts