Is this ok or should I delete it?

[I.M.O.G.]

Someone reported this submission:

http://hwbot.org/submission/2236453

 

It isn't a particularly valuable score, so I could just delete it. It looks like I made a mistake and forgot to click the memory tab - there are 2 CPU tabs displayed for CPUz.

 

The score is accurate for the clocks however, not especially well tweaked, and memory settings make very little difference for UCBench. I'd like to keep it because there aren't a whole lot of 7GHz UCBench submissions and despite it not being worth much or especially good, I'm proud of the result.

 

I've never had one of my submissions reported before, so I'm not sure how to handle it. Ruling from hwbot staff?

[Gamer]

I can give you an answer :

Hello,

An HWBOT moderator, "Christian Ney", has blocked one of your submitted scores. It has marked one of your submissions as 'insufficient verification'.

This was the reason the user gave:

you forgot cpuz cpu man, have to block

http://hwbot.org/submission/2279739_gamer_3dmark06_2x_radeon_hd_5850_42733_marks

 

So yes, they do care

[I.M.O.G.]

Thanks, appreciate the word of experience. That's kind of a bummer.

[Gamer]

The funny thing is, nr2 in that category reported it

So now I will rebench it with even higher clocks

[Eeky NoX]

Especially when the same moderator gat his 1st place stolen

 

Sorry for you... CN isn't fairplay sometimes ^^ "The rules are the rules!" he said

[Christian Ney]

Especially when the same moderator gat his 1st place stolen

 

Sorry for you... CN isn't fairplay sometimes ^^ "The rules are the rules!" he said

 

For my defence:

 

Quote=hwbot

"HWBot is not perfect, neither are the result moderators"

[Eeky NoX]

for My Defence:

 

Quote=hwbot

"hwbot Is Not impartial, Neither Are The Result Moderators"

Omg!! R'ly?

 

I'm joking of course, but I think it's not that good though

 

Even if I know you did'nt report that score, moderators can be quicker than others to report what impacts on their own ones

[jjjc]

If it's a legit score that follows the rules then you have no reason to fear the quickfire reporting moderators.

[knopflerbruce]

We should use "common sense", that is: don't block EVERY result that does not strictly follow the rules, if it's low boint and "normal" in terms of clocks and efficiency, then maybe blocking is not needed. If it receives a fair amount of boints it's different, you can't get away with a top 20 global score without a mem tab in any case for example. I wouldn't block this one, but you do run the risk of having a sub blocked if there's something wrong with the screenshot. It was CN's decision, so I won't undo it.

[Christian Ney]

Didn't block it

 

 

Yet...

[I.M.O.G.]

I love the suspense! lol

 

Is a blocked score still listed under a members profile/history? Stopping to think about it, that's all I'm really concerned with... It doesn't count for my league ranking, it only gets 7 points for the team, but I'll remember I did it if its still in my hardware library and that's what actually matters to me.

[Christian Ney]

No, the result isn't shown anymore in your profile's submission/points.

I don't think it is in the hardware library too (maybe only if deleted).

But it stays in the profile history (last submissions if not too old otherwise you have to scrolls deep down).

 

Anyway we can try

[I.M.O.G.]

K, let's find out.

[Christian Ney]

done

[I.M.O.G.]

Gone completely from my profile now, like I never did it.

 

And turrican had just reviewed and approved it earlier today. Lol

 

An HWBOT moderator, "Turrican", has marked one of your submissions as 'checked by a moderator'.

 

This was the reason the user gave:

 

no need for system picture. score is ok, so no mem-tab is ok this time, but next time please don't forget it.

[Turrican]

lol.

[Gamer]

If you last score got errased by Christian, your previous submission isn't visible anymore?

[Leeghoofd]

WTF biased moderators, the bot is going down

[Turrican]

not biased, but just giving him a chance, to decide himself.

[Christian Ney]

Checked it back

[Turrican]

Checked it back

 

looool

[I.M.O.G.]

And now it says #1 UCBench World Record... Yet its ranked 72nd for hex cores. lol

[Christian Ney]

Yes because none of them got checked before and as this one is the first one checked ever it has been ranked as WW#1 by the engine