Jump to content

Featured Replies

version 2.26 has the some bug! the problem is MANUAL setting!

 

all score can be a fake(with version 2.26 to 2.51)!

  • Replies 376
  • Views 63k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

version 2.26 has the some bug! the problem is MANUAL setting!

 

all score can be a fake(with version 2.26 to 2.51)!

 

It's fixed now, thanks.

As for the possibility of fake scores flying around:

1. Hard to believe many thought of doing that exploit.

2. If they did, the score will stand out from the crowd, it will have to be done with a card with very few results (impossible on HWBOT) to be hard to moderate.

It's fixed now, thanks.

As for the possibility of fake scores flying around:

1. Hard to believe many thought of doing that exploit.

2. If they did, the score will stand out from the crowd, it will have to be done with a card with very few results (impossible on HWBOT) to be hard to moderate.

 

ok...if you set all to low, the score increase to 300000points, but if you set only some setting to low, the score increase of 30-50000 points ONLY!

need a new table with setting in bench mark!

 

i find another method to do that....more simple of first method!!!!! is not impossible!

I never tried manuell mode^^ Please remove it completly Genie :)

 

It's there for IGP cards, they don't work otherwise.

Send me a PM with what you did in 2.26.

genieben, what have you fix? the checksum validate?

 

can you add a window with internal setting of am3?

genieben, what have you fix? the checksum validate?

 

can you add a window with internal setting of am3?

 

What you explained me in PM, that can't be done anymore, or similar methods.

The checksum is there for validating the score (so you dont photoshop the screenshot or insert new values in memory).

What you explained me in PM, that can't be done anymore, or similar methods.

The checksum is there for validating the score (so you dont photoshop the screenshot or insert new values in memory).

 

but you have make a new version of wrapper? previous version are blocked?

Wrapper doesn't start at all, Windows XP SP3, GeForce GTX 470 on single-stage @ 1020/2300, 327.23. Finished the benchmark if I run the original benchmark.

 

Every time i want to bench AM3 something doesn't work at all :( Tired of this, really.

I cannot get 2.51 to run. I always get the error message that the file MSVCP100.DLL is missing. Even after installing Visual C++ manually it doesn't work. The funny thing is that the DLL is located in the system32 folder but it still doesn't work. I copied the DLL into the AM3 folder and the error message disappeared but it still won't start.

I cannot get 2.51 to run. I always get the error message that the file MSVCP100.DLL is missing. Even after installing Visual C++ manually it doesn't work. The funny thing is that the DLL is located in the system32 folder but it still doesn't work. I copied the DLL into the AM3 folder and the error message disappeared but it still won't start.

 

What version of the VC redistributable did you install? I had the same issue last night, and found that I needed the 2010 version (tried the 2008 one first) of vcredist for it to work. :) (Win7 64bit...)

You only have to do a simple google query and open the second result :P

It takes more to write the question in this thread than finding the solution on google.

Seems like AM3 doesnt like u Roman :P

Will install an fresh Windows 7 today and test what all is needed to get it running, on Server 2008r2 it has worked fine:)

 

@all having problems, are u using slim or light Windows Versions?

Maybee thats the problem^^

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...