Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Calathea - GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448 @ 1155/1300MHz - 34293 marks 3DMark Vantage - Performance


Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

Not sure K404... there are no scores to compare... also, Tolsty score was made with a 3rd gen Intel that boosts GPU clocks.. instead 2nd gen Sandy Bridge.

We can not compare different tecnoligies, because new gen push GPU clock many more than old technology... and the only score comes from Tolsty with 3770K.

 

For example:

http://img.hwbot.org/u29462/image_id_542089.png

http://img.hwbot.org/u28198/image_id_752532.png

 

Attempt than even with lower CPU clock, 3770K pushed VGA with similar clocks too higher than 2600K... its only one example.

I looked for efficiency... new windows, new drivers...lots of scores increased step by step, and looks impossible to beat more than 33K with 1155/1300.

 

That's the best efficiency I found to this clock... and I ran many times

 

rufi.png

 

3xez.jpg

 

The reason I posted is only to check... maybe a bug... I don't know... but to me, looks for impossible score to this clocks.

Looking forward to sandybags to know how the scores will work... maybe I am wrong... but according what I know about the card... this will be SO FAR the winner... even with this clocks

 

Thanks for undertanding

Edited by Schenckel bros
Posted (edited)
score is OK

Maybe...

If score is ok, we will see lots of Sandybagging with better scores, since I believe 1150 mhz is not enough.

About the RAMS, I don't believe 50 Mhz more can provide 3000 GPU points, but I have no card to check or no scores to compare...further Calathea GPU is 70 Mhz lower.

About 2nd and 3rd gen, intersting that 3rd can boost this way the CPU.

Respect both opinions and scores, but still look forward other MOA scores to be sure.

Good lucky to all.

Edited by rbuass
Posted
Not sure K404... there are no scores to compare... also, Tolsty score was made with a 3rd gen Intel that boosts GPU clocks.. instead 2nd gen Sandy Bridge.

We can not compare different tecnoligies, because new gen push GPU clock many more than old technology... and the only score comes from Tolsty with 3770K.

 

For example:

http://img.hwbot.org/u29462/image_id_542089.png

http://img.hwbot.org/u28198/image_id_752532.png

 

Attempt than even with lower CPU clock, 3770K pushed VGA with similar clocks too higher than 2600K... its only one example.

I looked for efficiency... new windows, new drivers...lots of scores increased step by step, and looks impossible to beat more than 33K with 1155/1300.

 

That's the best efficiency I found to this clock... and I ran many times

 

The reason I posted is only to check... maybe a bug... I don't know... but to me, looks for impossible score to this clocks.

Looking forward to sandybags to know how the scores will work... maybe I am wrong... but according what I know about the card... this will be SO FAR the winner... even with this clocks

 

Thanks for undertanding

 

use 320.18 driver 320.00 cant go high then 999MHz on core

Posted

PCI-E Gen 3 will have very nearly zero effect on the score.

 

 

Please also look at these scores:

 

http://hwbot.org/submission/2377088_alibabar_3dmark_vantage___performance_geforce_gtx_560_ti_448_31607_marks

 

Only 180 points behind you, with over 200MHz less! on the core and 75MHz less on the GDDR....(not even using drivers that allow >1GHz core)

 

 

 

This one: http://hwbot.org/submission/2258875_rkinslo_3dmark_vantage___performance_geforce_gtx_560_ti_448_30375_marks

 

Comparing is a little more difficult because of the CPU speed but look at the GPU MHz. You have a 30% advantage in core speed and15% in GDDR clocks, but only 10% higher GPU score. This score does not have LOD either.

 

 

http://hwbot.org/submission/2253233_cowgut_3dmark_vantage___performance_geforce_gtx_560_ti_448_30236_marks

 

Same here. You have 20% higher core, almost 10% higher GDDR. 350MHz more on the CPU.... and only a small increase in GPU score. Again, this score has no LOD.

 

I can keep going bro. Your efficiency is off.

Posted
PCI-E Gen 3 will have very nearly zero effect on the score.

 

 

Please also look at these scores:

 

http://hwbot.org/submission/2377088_alibabar_3dmark_vantage___performance_geforce_gtx_560_ti_448_31607_marks

 

Only 180 points behind you, with over 200MHz less! on the core and 75MHz less on the GDDR....(not even using drivers that allow >1GHz core)

 

 

 

This one: http://hwbot.org/submission/2258875_rkinslo_3dmark_vantage___performance_geforce_gtx_560_ti_448_30375_marks

 

Comparing is a little more difficult because of the CPU speed but look at the GPU MHz. You have a 30% advantage in core speed and15% in GDDR clocks, but only 10% higher GPU score. This score does not have LOD either.

 

 

http://hwbot.org/submission/2253233_cowgut_3dmark_vantage___performance_geforce_gtx_560_ti_448_30236_marks

 

Same here. You have 20% higher core, almost 10% higher GDDR. 350MHz more on the CPU.... and only a small increase in GPU score. Again, this score has no LOD.

 

I can keep going bro. Your efficiency is off.

 

Not sure again

 

1st score can be boosted by 3rd gen Intel, like score in previous post.

 

2nd score is ok with my point of view... 3300 points with Sandy Bridge... is exact my way of view... and score is ok

 

3rd score ... I think 1500 points is a lot for Vantage...

 

What I mean is that I believe the score is too high for 1155/1300.

I did try and try... and check efficiency with SO, drivers and so on...

Then I just asked to check if score is all right... maybe a bug or something like this.

Also think we will see many more scores to compare in a couple of days, so we can be sure.

Posted

Or maybe he just knows something you don't, I for one is getting pretty tired of all the complaining from some of contestants this year. I don't know all tweaks for every benchmark there is but I don't go and call everyone that gets a higher score with the same clocks a cheater. You have to respect and belive that all competitors follow the rules and do not cheat otherwise you just look like an idiot when more people score better than you.

 

Oh and Schenckel bros, your submisson is missing video beacause your gpu is over 1200. ;)

Posted (edited)

I can tell you that the winning Vantage score will be much higher than Calatheas score

 

With pre. 320.00 driver even if you set the core speed to 1400mhz the core is only running at 999mhz it is a bug in the driver therfore use the 320.18 or 320.49 or even better use the new 326.19 driver

 

The calathea score is ok in efficinsy and there is no bug there.

Edited by riska
Posted

Hi guys I se this stirred up quite a discussion. Frankly I feel a bit offended by SCHENCKEL BROS and RBUASS insinuation of this being fake. This was ran with 1155/1300 MHz as shown. This card can't do 1200 core, it's the same card I used in semis http://hwbot.org/submission/2382890_calathea_3dmark11___performance_geforce_gtx_560_ti_448_8696_marks

 

Being a Twin Frozr III card, there still isn't a bios to solve cold bug available so I'm stuck at sub 1200 MHz. Hence didn't bother with video.

 

In a few days we will surely see people posting with unlocked bios and core clocks above 1300 MHz, leaving this score way behind :)

Posted

I believe the score is correct.

Also I don't see Schenckel accusing, but just asking about "why score is too high"... he is not a complaining, but just asking.

@Schenckel try other drivers in >999 Mhz to check, because I believe Zoolio is right...

Maybe your card shows 1200 on GPUZ, but running at 1000 Mhz.

 

;)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...