Jump to content
HWBOT Community Forums

Mr.Scott

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    3433

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    71

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Mr.Scott

  1. Mr.Scott
    http://www.hwbot.org/community/submission/2126516_nwd_wprime_32m_athlon_mp_1800_1min_3sec_844ms Sorry Alex, but your solution here doesn't agree with the rules.
  2. Mr.Scott
    WTG Travis.
  3. Mr.Scott
    No official backround for this competition?
  4. Mr.Scott
    Why the bridge mod to MP? It offers no better performance, unless you intend on running two of them in a dual CPU board. Or did you just add the note because I reported the submissions for being in the wrong category?
  5. Mr.Scott
    You might be able to control content here, but you have a snowballs chance in hell of controlling content on somebody else's site. I dig my new user title BTW. It's much classier than just calling me some profanic name.
  6. Mr.Scott
    See post 106 then.
  7. Mr.Scott
    Which you didn't believe, and got him nowhere anyway right? If you're gonna be convicted and penalized, you might as well do the crime and make it worth it.
  8. Mr.Scott
    Dejo - tell them she's a foster child. I can play games too man.
  9. Mr.Scott
    Nice out. Inadvertently, you win again. Dejo - set up your daughters account through a proxy and tell them she moved out.
  10. Mr.Scott
    Based on what.....similiar screenshots? Ridiculous. See post 106 I'd be more suspicious of that.
  11. Mr.Scott
    And nothing has been about this for the same reason, lack of proof positive. Yet the law is being laid down on the father/daughter for "potentially suspicious" activity. Ironic huh.
  12. Mr.Scott
    Oh, you didn't know?....It depends on who you are.
  13. Mr.Scott
    I understand that, but consistancy in enforcement can be upheld. Also, I find the sarcasm you use when backed into a corner, amusing.
  14. Mr.Scott
    Not at all. Is this not the stance you've taken with everybody else from day one? Refering to the "actions without proof" of course.
  15. Mr.Scott
    Irrelevant. Prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that they're done by the same person or are using shared hardware.
  16. Mr.Scott
    This. ^^^ You've always stated that HWBot will take no action without undeniable proof......well, show the proof that they're sharing, or have intent to share.
  17. Mr.Scott
    That would be Crucial PC133. Micron chips.
  18. Mr.Scott
    I HAVE seen it for myself. I report a few every day. Unfortunately, trying to get them fixed takes an act of congress, because everybody has an excuse. Rewarding faulty submissions is not the cure, it's welfare, and will stop nothing.
  19. Mr.Scott
    Ridiculous. You want to reward entries with errors now? Bring it on. I can make a lot of mistakes.
  20. Mr.Scott
    You're comparing apples to oranges there. A little common sense goes a long way here. Splitting hairs to find loopholes in the rules is a tough road to travel my friend. I'm just sayin'.......
  21. Mr.Scott
    Lol. No doubt.
  22. Mr.Scott
    I think "ERROR IN COMPUTATION" makes it quite clear. Old or new rules make no difference in this case. ERROR means invalid.
  23. Mr.Scott
    You're much more patient than I am. I have a hard time waiting for PIII's to finish.
  24. Mr.Scott
    Both links are identical to me.
  25. Mr.Scott
    It's on one and two (#19 and #31). I think it's because there's no zero in the .xxx part of the time and the DB can't decide where it goes. You need to start putting all three numbers in buddy.
×
×
  • Create New...